Skip to main content

The ‘Learning Office’ as an Approach for Inclusive Education in Mathematics: Opportunities and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inclusive Mathematics Education

Abstract

The main goal of the case study presented in this paper was to evaluate an example of how inclusive mathematics education can be organised within a whole school approach. We selected a comprehensive school which was identified as successful in managing the heterogeneity of students within the classroom. This school uses an approach called learning office, which we describe in the theoretical section of the paper. We used video-based observations, stimulated recalls and group interviews to evaluate how the learning office is implemented in practice. From these data sources, several opportunities and challenges could be derived. Keeping some methodical limitations in mind, we can conclude that the learning office seems to be an adequate approach for designing inclusive mathematics education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the following sections, we will only use the acronym GeSchwind Sek I when referring to our project.

  2. 2.

    Translated in a literal way, this term would mean ‘focus school’. As this does not seem to be an appropriate term in this context, we will instead use the term ‘mainstream schools’.

  3. 3.

    For more general consideration regarding video-based observation research methods, see Asan and Montague (2014) and, with focus on qualitative research, Heath, Hindmarsh, and Luff (2010).

References

  • Amrhein, B. (2011). Inklusion in der Sekundarstufe: Eine empirische Analyse [Inclusion in secondary school: An empirical analysis]. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asan, O., & Montague, E. (2014). Using video-based observation research methods in primary care health encounters to evaluate complex interactions. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, 21(4), 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2015). Introducing research methodology: A beginner’s guide to doing a research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, J., Goschler, W., & Ratz, C. (2017). Das Pascalsche Dreieck als “Gemeinsamer Lerngegenstand” für Schülerinnen mit dem Förderschwerpunkt geistige Entwicklung in heterogenen Gruppen [Pascal’s triangle as an ‘object of mutual learning’ for students with the special needs focus mental development in heterogeneous groups]. In E. Fischer & C. Ratz (Eds.), Inklusion – Chancen und Herausforderungen für Menschen mit geistiger Behinderung (pp. 192–209). Weinheim, Germany/Basel, Switzerland: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2016). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. Essex: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, A., Kohler, M. C., & Riessmann, F. (1971). Children teach children: Learning by teaching. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauer, K. (2012). A case for case study research in education. In S. R. Klein (Ed.), Action research methods (pp. 69–79). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gwiasda, M. (2015). Überlegungen zur Einführung in die beschreibende Statistik im gemeinsamen Unterricht einer 7. Klasse [Thoughts on the introduction of descriptive statistics in the inclusive teacher of a 7th grade]. In J. Riegert & O. Musenberg (Eds.), Inklusiver Fachunterricht in der Sekundarstufe (pp. 71–74). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, U., Kahlert, J., Lelgemann, R., & Fischer, E. (Eds.). (2016). Inklusives Schulsystem: Analysen, Befunde, Empfehlungen zum bayerischen Weg [Inclusive school system: Analyses, results, recommendations on the Bavarian way]. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korff, N. (2015). Inklusiver Mathematikunterricht in der Primarstufe. Erfahrungen, Perspektiven und Herausforderungen [Inclusive mathematics education in primary school. Experiences, perspectives and challenges]. Baltmannsweiler, Germany: Schneider Hohengehren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krätzschmar, M. (2010). Selbstkonzepte in altersgemischten Lerngruppen [Self-concepts in mixed-ages learning groups]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubenstein, D., Lindmeier, C., Guthöhrlein, K., & Scheer, D. (2015). Auf dem Weg zur schulischen Inklusion: Empirische Befunde zum gemeinsamen Unterricht in rheinland-pfälzischen Schwerpunktschulen [On the way to inclusion in school: Empirical results on mutual learning in main stream schools in Rhineland-Palatinate]. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenze, M., & Lutz-Westphal, B. (2015). Fachdidaktische Ansätze für einen inklusiven Mathematikunterricht am Beispiel der Einführung in die beschreibende Statistik [Approaches from subject matter didactics towards inclusive mathematics education exemplified on the introduction of descriptive statistics]. In J. Rieger & O. Musenberg (Eds.), Inklusiver Fachunterricht in der Sekundarstufe (pp. 43–57). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messmer, R. (2015). Stimulated recall as a focused approach to action and thought processes of teachers. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.1.2051

  • Musenberg, O., & Riegert, J. (2016). Didaktik und Differenz [Didactics and difference]. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter-Koop, A., Lüken, M. M., & Rottmann, T. (2015). Inklusiver Mathematikunterricht in der Grundschule [Inclusive mathematics education in primary school]. Dortmund, Germany: Mildenberger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratz, C. (2015). “Das Kind da abholen, wo es steht” – Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit dem Förderschwerpunkt geistige Entwicklung in der Sekundarstufe als Voraussetzung für inklusiven Mathematikunterricht [Mathematical competences of students with the special needs focus mental development in secondary school as a prerequisite of inclusive mathematics education]. In J. Rieger & O. Musenberg (Eds.), Inklusiver Fachunterricht in der Sekundarstufe (pp. 57–70). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rödler, K. (2016). Ein Mathematikunterricht für alle! 10 Bausteine für einen inklusiven Mathematikunterricht in der Grundschule [One mathematics classroom for all! 10 building blocks for inclusive mathematics education in primary school]. behinderte menschen, 39(4/5), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, A., & Werner, B. (2014). Warum ist eigentlich drei mal drei gleich zehn? Anregungen zur Gestaltung eines Mathematikunterrichts in inklusiven Settings [Why is three times three actually ten? Suggestions for the design of mathematics education in inclusive settings]. In S. Trumpa, S. Seilfried, E.-K. Franz, & T. Klauß (Eds.), Inklusive Bildung: Erkenntnisse und Konzepte aus Fachdidaktik und Sonderpädagogik (pp. 321–331). Weinheim, Germany/Basel, Switzerland: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, D., Laubenstein, D., Lindmeier, C., Guthöhrlein, K., & Sponholz, D. (2016). Ein Bundesland auf dem Weg zu schulischer Inklusion? [A federal state on the way to inclusion in school?]. Gemeinsam Leben, 24(4), 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberg, S. (Ed.). (2015). Offener Unterricht im heterogenen Klassenzimmer [Open teaching in the heterogeneous classroom]. Mühlheim, Germany: Verlag an der Ruhr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, R., Schnettler, B., & Knoblauch, H. (2013). Videographie [Videography]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vock, M., & Gronostaj, A. (2017). Umgang mit Heterogenität in Schule und Unterricht [Dealing with heterogeneity in school and teaching]. Berlin, Germany: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Désirée Laubenstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laubenstein, D., Guthöhrlein, K., Lindmeier, C., Scheer, D., Sponholz, D. (2019). The ‘Learning Office’ as an Approach for Inclusive Education in Mathematics: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Kollosche, D., Marcone, R., Knigge, M., Penteado, M.G., Skovsmose, O. (eds) Inclusive Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11518-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11518-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11517-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11518-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics