Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Modelling of the Interaction of the Different Vehicles and Various Transport Modes pp 1–103Cite as

Methodology for Multi-criteria Selection of Transportation Technology in Transport Network

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The chapter presents a methodology for multi-criteria selection of transportation technologies in a transport network. The methodology consists of the following stages: development of transport alternatives; optimization the parameters of the transportation for each alternative by economical criterion, evaluation the alternatives, taking into account the uncertainty of the processes; choice of additional quantitative and qualitative criteria for assessing the alternatives, and determination the weights of additional criteria by using AHP method or its fuzzy version by applying the theory of fuzzy sets FAHP; prioritization the alternatives according the additional criteria by applying PROMETHEE method; definition an complex optimization criterion for choosing the optimal alternative of transport technologies in a state of certainty and uncertainty. The methodology has been applied to develop a multi-criteria model for the optimization of the transport scheme in passenger rail transport; multi-criteria model for route selection in the transport network; multi-criteria model for assessing the efficiency of intermodal passenger and freight transport. The research objective of this chapter was to experiment the application of the developed methodology in different modes of transport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdullah A, Mingzhou J, Clarke DB, Hoque MA (2015) Train design and routing optimization for evaluating criticality of freight railroad infrastructures. Transp Res Part B Methodol 71(1):71–84

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agarski B, Kljaji M, Budak I, Tadic B, Vukelic D, Bosak M, Hodolic J (2012) Application of multi-criteria assessment in evaluation of motor vehicles’ environmental performances. Tehnicheki vjesnik 19(2):221–226

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agarski B, Budak I, Kosec B et al (2012) An approach to multi-criteria environmental evaluation with multiple weight assignment. Environ Model Asses 17–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9294-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aksoy A, Küçükoğlu İ, Ene S, Öztürk N (2014) Integrated emission and fuel consumption calculation model for green supply chain management. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 109:1106–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alireza S, Kaboli D, Carmichael G (2014) Truck dispatching and minimum emissions earthmoving. Smart Sustain Built Environ 3(2):170–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alp O, Demitras N, Baracli H, Tuzkaya U (2011) Fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE methodology to select bus carage location: a case study for a firm in the urban passenger transport sector in Istanbul. In: 15th international research/expert conference TMT, Prague, pp 273–276

    Google Scholar 

  7. Artamonov M, Ilarionov V, Morin M (1976) Motor vehicles. Fundamentals and design. Mir Publishers, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aruldoss M, Lakshmi TM, Venkatesan VP (2013) A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am J Inf Syst 1(1):31–43

    Google Scholar 

  9. Athawale VM, Chakraborty S (2011) A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection. Int J Ind Eng Comput 2:831–850

    Google Scholar 

  10. Awasthi A, Chauhan SS (2012) A hybrid approach integrating affinity diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning. Appl Math Model 36:573–584

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. BalBeşikçi E, Kececi T, Arslan O, Turan O (2016) An application of fuzzy-AHP to ship operational energy efficiency measures. Ocean Eng 121:392–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berrittella M, Certa A, Enea M, Zito P (2008) Transport policy and climate change: how to decide when experts disagree. Environ Sci Policy 11:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertolini L (1999) Spatial development patterns and public transport: the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Plan Pract Res 14:199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beynona MJ, Wells P (2008) The lean improvement of the chemical emissions of motor vehicles based on preference ranking: a PROMETHEE uncertainty analysis. Omega 36(3):384–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bulut E, Duru O, Keçeci T, Yoshida S (2012) Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: a process model for shipping asset management. Expert Syst Appl 39:1911–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang D (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang Y-H, Yeh C-H, Shen C-C (2000) A multiobjective model for passenger train services planning: application to Taiwan’s high-speed rail line. Transp Res Part B 34(2):91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chanta S, Sangsawang O (2005) Application of AHP for traveling salesman problem. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer and industrial management, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  19. Danloup N, Mirzabeiki V, Allaoui H, Goncalves G, Julien D, Mena C (2015) Reducing transportation greenhouse gas emissions with collaborative distribution: a case study. Manag Res Rev 38(10):1049–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davison S, Elshout S, Wester B (2008) Common information to European air integrated urban emission inventories. European Regional Development Fund Regional Initiative Project European Union

    Google Scholar 

  21. D’Urso MG, Masi D (2015) Multi-criteria decision-making methods and their applications for human resources. In: ISPRS Workshop of Commission VI 1–3. Advances in web-based education services, 18–19 June 2015, Berlin, Germany, pp 31–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ehsani M, Gao Y, Gay S, Emadi A (2005) Modern electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles: fundamentals, theory, and design. CRC Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ehsani M, Ahmadi A, Fadai D (2016) Modelling of vehicle fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emission in road transport. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:1638–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. El Amine M, Pailhes J, Perry N (2014) Comparison of different Multiple-criteria decision analysis methods in the context of conceptual design: application to the development of a solar collector structure. In: Proceedings of joint conference on mechanical, design engineering & advanced manufacturing, Toulouse, France, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erdoğan NK, Altınırmak S, Karamaşa Ç (2016) Comparison of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with respect to performance of food firms listed in BIST. Copernic J Financ Account 5(1):67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. European Truck Challenge ETC (2014). http://european-truck-challenge.com/downloads/etc-test-2014.pdf

  27. Gao Y, Yang L, Li S (2016) Uncertain models on railway transportation planning problem. Appl Math Model 40(7–8):4921–4934

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Germano S, Quadros R, Nassi CD (2015) An evaluation on the criteria to prioritize transportation infrastructure investments in Brazil. Transp Policy 4:8–16

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guzman V, Masegosa A, Pelta D, Verdegay J (2016) Fuzzy models and resolution methods for covering location problems: an annotated bibliography. Int J Unc Fuzz Knowl Based Syst 24(4):561–591. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218488516500276

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Hergesell A (2017) Environmental commitment in holiday transport mode choice. Int J Cult Tour Hosp Res 11(1):67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hickman J, Hassel D, Joumard R, Samaras Z, Sorenson S (1999) MEET methodology for calculating transport emissions and energy consumption. European Commission, DG VII, p 381. http://www.transport-research.info/sites/default/files/project/documents/meet.pdf

  32. Hüttermann R, Rose M (1999) Modellierung eines hierarchischen graphensystems zur behandlung großer graphen in ingenieuranwendungen. https://www.irz.uni-hannover.de/fileadmin/institut/dokumente/BIForum1997.pdf

  33. Isaai M, Kanani A, Tootoonchi M, Afzali H (2011) Intelligent timetable evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 38:3718–3723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Islam D, Zunde T, Jorna R (2013) Performance evaluation of an online benchmarking tool for European freight transport chains. Benchmarking Int J 20(2):233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ivanovic I, Grujicic D, Macura D, Jovic J, Bojovic N (2013) One approach for road transport project selection. Transp Policy 25:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kabashi S, Bekteshi S, Ahmetaj S, Kabashi G, Blinc R, Zidanšek I (2011) Greenhouse gas and air pollution emissions and options for reducing from the Kosovo transportation sector dynamic modelling. Manag Environ Qual Int J 22(1):72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Katarzina N, Katarzina S (2014) Aplication of AHP method for multi-criteria evaluation of variants of the integration of urban transport. In: 17th meeting of the Euro working group on transportation, EWGT2014, Seville, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) An integrated fuzzy AHP-ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment. Expert Syst Appl 38:8553–8562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kazan H, Ciftci C (2013) Transport path selection: multi-criteria comparison. Int J Oper Logist Manag 2(4):33–48

    Google Scholar 

  40. Keisuke S, Kei T, Norio T (2013) A MIP-based timetable rescheduling formulation and algorithm minimizing further inconvenience to passengers. J Rail Transp Plan Manag 3:38–53

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kengpol A, Tuammee S, Tuominen M (2007) The development of a framework for route selection in multimodal transportation. Int J Logist Manag 25(3):581–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Keshkamat S, Looijen JM, Zuidgeest MP (2009) The formulation and evaluation of transport route planning alternatives: a spatial decision support system for the Via Baltica project Poland. J Transp Geogr 17:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kevin F, Liu R, Lai JH (2009) Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: a hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Syst Appl 36:5119–5136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Khanam J, Talib F (2016) A DEMATEL approach for prioritizing the TQM enablers and IT resources in the Indian ICT industry. Int J Appl Manag Sci Eng 3(1):11–26

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kim DJ, Chung SB, Song KH, Hong SY (2005) Development of an assessment model using AHP technique for railroad projects experiencing severe conflict in Korea. Proc Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud 5:2260–2274

    Google Scholar 

  46. Knorr W, Hüttermann R (2016) EcoPassenger. Environmental methodology and data. HaCon Ing. Gmbh Hannover. http://ecopassenger.hafas.de/hafas-res/download/Ecopassenger_Methodology_Data.pdf

  47. Kopytov E, Abramov D (2012) Multiple-criteria analysis and choice of transportation alternatives in multimodal freight transport system. Transp Telecommun 13(2):148–158

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kopytov E, Abramov D (2013) Multiple-criteria choice of transportation alternatives in freight transport system for different types of cargo. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference reliability and statistics in transportation and communication (RelStat’13), Riga, Latvia, pp 180–187

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kumar A, Sah B, Singh AR, Deng Y, He X, Kumar P, Bansal RC (2017) A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69(C):596–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lewandowski P (2016) User charges for road infrastructure in certain European Union member states. Sci J Marit Univ Szczecin 48(120):138–145

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lidestam H, Abrahamsson M (2010) Environmental evaluation of public procurement for bus transports. Manag Environ Qual Int J 21(5):645–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Limbourg S, Jourquin B (2009) Optimal rail-road container terminal location on the European network. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 45(4):551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Longo G, E Padoano, P Rosato (2009) Considerations on the application of AHP/ANP methodologies to decisions concerning the railway infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  54. Longo G, Medeossi G, Strami S (2011) The approach for railway project appraisal: proposal for a specific problem structure. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  55. Luca S (2014) Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: an analytic hierarchy process based approach. Transp Policy 33:110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Maskeliūnaite L, Sivilevičius H, Podvezko V (2009) Research on the quality of passenger transportation by railway. Transport. 24(2):100–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Meng X, Cui B (2014) Train repathing in emergencies based on fuzzy linear programming. Sci World J 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  58. Meng X, Cui B, Limin J (2014) Line planning in emergencies for railway networks. Kybernetes 43(1):40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mergias I, Moustakas K, Papadopoulos A, Loizidou M (2007) Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: the case of Cyprus. J Hazard Mater 147:706–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Mitropoulos L, Prevedouros P (2014) Multicriterion sustainability assessment in transportation private cars. Carsharing and transit buses. Transp Res Rec 2403:52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mohaghar A, Khanmohammadi E, Molavi M, Moradi-Moghadam M (2013) Applying interval VIKOR and fuzzy AHP methods for supplier selection. N Y Sci J 6(3):74–85

    Google Scholar 

  62. Mohajeri N, Amin GR (2010) Railway station site selection using analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis. Comput Ind Eng 59:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Montesinos-Valera J, Aragonés-Beltrán P, Pastor-Ferrando JP (2011) Selection of rail improvement project using the analytic network process (ANP). In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  64. Moradi A, Etebarian A, Shirvani A, Soltani (2014) Development of a fuzzy model for Iranian marine casualties management. J Fuzzy Set Valued Anal 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5899/2014/jfsva-00186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Nosal K, Solecka K (2014) Application of AHP method for multi-criteria evaluation of variants of the integration of urban public transport. Transp Res Procedia 3:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Piantanakulcha M, Saengkhao N (2003) Evaluation of alternatives in transportation planning using multi-stakeholders multi-objectives AHP modelling. Proc Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud 4:1613–1628

    Google Scholar 

  67. Podvezko V, Sivilevius H (2013) The use of AHP and rank correlation methods for determining the significance of the interaction between the elements of a transport system having a strong influence on traffic safety. Transport 28(4):389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Robenek T, Chen J, Bierlaire M (2013) Exploratory analysis of demand interaction in the planning of passenger railway service. In: Transp—OR, EPFL, 13th Swiss transport research conference, Monte Verita, Ascona, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  69. Robenek T, Chen J, Bierlaire M (2014) the ideal train timetabling problem. In: 14th Swiss transport research conference, Monte Verita, Ascona, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  70. Robenek T, Maknoon Y, Bierlaire M (2015) Railway passenger service timetable design. In: EPFL 15th Swiss transport research conference, Monte Verita, Ascona, Transport and Mobility Laboratory, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rodrigues FLJ, Osiro L, Carpinetti RL (2014) A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 21:194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Saaty TL (1999) Rank for comparisons and from ratings in the analytic network hierarchy/network processes. Eur J Oper Res 168:557–570

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Saaty TL (1999) Fundamentals of analytic network process. In: International symposium of analytic hierarchy process, Japan, Kobe

    Google Scholar 

  74. Saaty RW (2003) The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making and the analytical network process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and feedback. Creative Decision Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sadasivuni R, O’Hara C, Nobrega RAA, Dumas J (2009) A transportation corridor case study for multi-criteria decision analysis. In: ASPRS 2009 annual conference Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sattayaprasert W, Hanaoka S, Taneerananon P, Pradhananga R (2008) Creating a risk-based network for hazmat logistics by route prioritization with AHP: case study: gasoline logistics in Rayong. IATSS Res 32(1):74–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sawadogo M, Anciaux D (2010) Reducing the environmental impacts of intermodal transportation: a multi-criteria analysis based on ELECTRE and AHP methods. In: 3rd international conference on information systems, logistics and supply chain creating value through green supply chains, Casablanca, Morocco, 10 pp

    Google Scholar 

  78. Sehatpour M, Kazemi A, Sehatpour H (2012) Evaluation of alternative fuels for light-duty vehicles in Iran using a multicriteria approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Shi F, Deng L, Huo L (2007) Bi-level programming model and algorithm of passenger train operation plan. China Railway Sci 28(3):110–116

    Google Scholar 

  80. Sogin S, Caughron B, Chadwick S (2012) Optimizing skip stop service in passenger rail transportation. In: Proceedings of the 2012 joint rail conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, pp 17–19

    Google Scholar 

  81. Solnes J (2003) Environmental quality indexing of large industrial development alternatives using AHP. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:283–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Soltani A, Marandi EZ, Ivaki YE (2013) Bus route evaluation using a two-stage hybrid model of fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. J Transp Lit 7(3):34–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Srinivasa R, Kumar D (2014) Multicriterion analysis in engineering and management. PHL Learning Private Limited, Delhi, p 266

    Google Scholar 

  84. Stoilova S (2016) Study of the efficiency of motorail trains as a factor in transport development. In: Bk2: Political sciences, law, finance, economics and tourism conference proceedings, SGEM 2016, pp 627–634. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2016/b25/s07.082

  85. Stoilova S (2018) An integrated approach for selection of intercity transport schemes on railway networks. Promet Traffic Transp 30(4):367–377. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v30i4.2673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Stoilova S (2018) Evaluation efficiency of intermodal transport using multi-criteria analysis. Engineering for rural development. In: 17th international scientific conference engineering for rural development, ERD 2018, Jelgava, Latvia, vol 17, pp 2030–2039

    Google Scholar 

  87. Stoilova S, Kunchev L (2012) Application of the mobile satellite navigation system to study the movement of the road train. Int Virtual J Mach Technol Mater 7:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  88. Stoilova S, Kunchev L (2013) Modeling of the fuel consumption of road train using GPRS system. In: International conference on automobile and vehicle technologies AVTHEC’13, Istanbul, pp 111–125

    Google Scholar 

  89. Stoilova S, Kunchev L (2016) Methodology for optimal transportation using a three-phase model C. R Acad Bulg Sci 69(7):903–908

    Google Scholar 

  90. Stoilova S, Kunchev L (2016) Application of the graph theory, AHP method and cost benefits analysis for route selection of a road train. J Balk Tribol Assoc 22(2):1041–1056

    Google Scholar 

  91. Stoilova S, Kunchev L (2017) Study of criteria for evaluation of transportation with intermodal transport. In: Proceedings of 16th international scientific conference engineering for rural development, Jelgava, Latvia, pp 349–357. https://doi.org/10.22616/erdev2017.16.n070

  92. Stoilova S, Kunchev L (2018) Study of the efficiency of passengers’ motorcar carriage by using multicriteria methods. JSIR77(07):414–418

    Google Scholar 

  93. Stoilova S, Kunchev L, Nedelchev K (2012) Investigation of technical and operational indices for the movement of a road train. Int Virtual J Mach Technol Mater 1:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  94. Tan P, Steinbach M, Kumar U (2006) Introduction to data mining. University of Minnesota, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  95. Thor J, Ding SH, Kamaruddin S (2013) Comparison of multi criteria decision making methods from the maintenance alternative selection perspective. Int J Eng Sci (IJES) 2(6):2319–1805

    Google Scholar 

  96. Tsagatakis I, Brace S, Passant N, Cooke S (2013) UK emission mapping methodology 2011. A report of the National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory, 49 pp

    Google Scholar 

  97. Tscheikner-Gratl F, Egger P, Rauch W, Kleidorfer M (2017) Comparison of multi-criteria decision support methods for integrated rehabilitation prioritization. Water 9(68):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  98. Vansteenwegen P, Oudheusden D (2007) Decreasing the passenger waiting time for an intercity rail network. Transp Res Part B 41:478–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Velasquez M, Hester PT (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Oper Res 10(2):56–66

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  100. Verdegay J (2015) Progress on fuzzy mathematical programming: a personal perspective. Fuzzy Sets Syst 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2015.08.023

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. Vujanovic D, Momcilovic V, Bojovic N, Papic V (2012) Evaluation of vehicle fleet maintenance management indicators by application of DEMATEL and ANP. Expert Syst Appl 39:10552–10563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Vytautas L, Gintaras S (2014) Passenger transport by railway: evaluation of economic and social Phenomenon. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 110:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Wen H, Lin S (2011) Performance evaluation of highway passenger transport enterprises’ operation based on the model of AHP-DEA. In: IEEE 18th international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IE&EM), Part 2, pp 811–815

    Google Scholar 

  104. Wendan Z, Jian L, Zhang Y (2016) Comprehensive evaluation index system of low carbon road transport based on fuzzy evaluation method. Procedia Eng 137:659–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Wenliang Z, Junli T, Lianbo D, Jin Q (2015) Integrated optimization of service-oriented train plan and schedule on intercity rail network with varying demand. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume, Article ID 419042, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  106. Xinfeng Y, Lanfen L, Yinzhen L, Ruichun H (2013) Route selection for railway passengers: A multi-objective model and optimization algorithm. J Transp Syst Eng Inf Technol 113(5):72–78

    Google Scholar 

  107. Xukuo G, Qiong W (2013) Research on the mode of present transportation in China and the analysis of railway transportation. In: 6th International conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering, pp 414–416

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ya F, Goverde RMP (2015) Stability and robustness analysis of acyclic timetable. In: 6th international conference on railway operations modelling and analysis, Rail Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  109. Ye J, Liu G (2009) Application of AHP model in decision of urban mass transit network scheme. In: International conference on management and service science, MASS ‘09, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  110. Yuan J (2006) Stochastic modeling of train delays and delay propagation in stations. Delft University, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  111. Zare R, Izadikhah M (2015) Multi-criteria decision making methods for comparing three models of aluminum ingot production through life cycle assessment. Appl Ecol Environ Res 15(3):1697–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Zhao J, Deng W (2011) Multilevel fuzzy decision support model for China’s urban rail transit planning schemes. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 5:10–24

    Google Scholar 

  113. Zhipeng H, Huimin N (2014) A bilevel programming model to optimize train operation based on satisfaction for an Intercity rail line. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, ID 432096, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  114. RISK & DecisionTools Suite (2018). http://www.palisade.com

  115. www.PROMETHEE-GAIA.net (2018). http://www.promethee-gaia.net

  116. Super Decisions CDF (2018). https://www.superdecisions.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Transport, Technical University of Sofia, 8 Kl. Ohridski Blvd, 1000, Sofia, Bulgaria

    Svetla Stoilova

Authors
  1. Svetla Stoilova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svetla Stoilova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Silesian University of Technology, Katowice, Poland

    Aleksander Sładkowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stoilova, S. (2020). Methodology for Multi-criteria Selection of Transportation Technology in Transport Network. In: Sładkowski, A. (eds) Modelling of the Interaction of the Different Vehicles and Various Transport Modes. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11512-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation