Skip to main content

Formal Analysis of the Conflictive Play of Actors Regarding the Building of a Dam

  • 288 Accesses

Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS,volume 42)

Abstract

French people were astonished to learn of the death of an opponent to the construction of a dam in the Sivens forest, in the Tarn department (France), during clashes with the police on the night of 25 to 26 October 2014. However, the violence of the means deployed to realize this work and the determination of opponents, together woven in the play of all the actors of this project, foreshadowed the possibility of such a drama. Using a formal analysis framework based on the sociology of organized action, we present a model of this interaction system whose simulation results highlight the overdetermined nature of the emergence of a conflict of extreme intensity. Variations in this model allow the identification of the main determinants of this conflict and to consider other possible futures.

Keywords

  • Social simulation
  • Play of actors
  • Use conflict
  • Governance
  • Natural resource

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11506-7_9
  • Chapter length: 26 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-11506-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 9.1

Notes

  1. 1.

    Name given to people who occupy a Zone A Défendre (Area to Be Defended).

  2. 2.

    Announced by the Ministry for environment and sustainable development on February 27, 2015, this protocol stipulates that (1) the General Council renounces this project, (2) does not attack the State for the cancellation of the decree authorizing the works, and (3) the State compensates the General Council for € 3.3 million.

  3. 3.

    Designed to replace the Nantes city airport, The Notre-Dame-des-Landes airport project, which dates back to the 1970s, was finally abandoned in January 2018.

  4. 4.

    https://tantquilyauradesbouilles.wordpress.com Accessed 25 Feb 2018.

  5. 5.

    “To die for ideas is one thing, but it’s still relatively stupid and silly”, T. Carcenac (La Dépêche du Midi, 27/10/2014).

References

  • Abrami G, Ferrand N, Morardet S, Murgue C, Popova A, De Fooij H, Farolfi S, Du Toit D, Aquae-Gaudi W (2012) Wat-A-Game, a toolkit for building role-playing games about integrated water management. In: Seppelt R, Voinov AA, Lange S, Bankamp D (eds) Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. 2012 iEMSs Meeting, Leipzig, pp 1912–1919. Available on http://www.iemss.org/sites/iemss2012//proceedings/E2_0811_Abrami_et_al.pdf Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Adreit F, Roggero P, Sibertin-Blanc C, Vautier C (2011) Using SocLab for a rigorous assessment of the social feasability of agricultural policies. Int J Agric Environ Inf Syst 2(2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/jaeis.2011070101

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1997) Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In: Conte R, Hegselmann R, Terna P (eds) Simulating social phenomena. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical system, vol 456. Springer, Berlin, pp 21–40

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barreteau O (2003) The joint use of role-playing games and models regarding negotiation processes: characterization of associations. J Artif Societies Soc Simul 6(2). Available on http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/3.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Baudet M, Miramon G (2014) Rapport relatif à l'emploi des munitions en opérations de maintien de l'ordre. IGPN/E/N°14-1899-I. Inspection Générale de la Police Nationale, Ministère de l'Intérieur, Paris, 41 p (13 Nov 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bès M-P, Blot F, Ducournau P (7/2015) Sivens: when dialogue breaks down. The making of a tragedy. Justice Spatiale - Spatial Justice n°8/2015. Available on https://www.jssj.org/article/sivens-quand-le-dialogue-devient-impossible-chronique-dun-drame-annonce/. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Bommel P, Diegue F, Bartabur D, Duart E, Montes E, Pereira M, Corral J, Lucena CJ, Morales Grosskopf H (2014) A Further step towards participatory modelling. Fostering stakeholder involvement in designing models by using executable UML. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 17(1):6. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2381

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • CACG (2001) Confortement de la ressource en eau sur le bassin du Tescou. Conseil Général du Tarn-et-Garonne, Montauban, 140 + 41 p. Available on http://www.collectif-testet.org/79+telecharger-le-rapport-cacg-2001.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Callon M (1986) The sociology of an actor-network. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A (eds) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Macmillan, London, pp 19–34

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Camille (12/2014) Sivens sans retenue: feuilles d'automne. Edition la Lenteur, 158 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambre d’agriculture Tarn-et-Garonne (2011) Visite de Nicolas Sarkozy dans le Tarn-et-Garonne: des avancées sur l'irrigation (Mars 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Court of Auditors (2015) Les agences de l’eau et la politique de l’eau : une cohérence à retrouver. Cour des Comptes, Paris, https://www.ccomptes.fr/fr/documents/30121

  • Crozier M (1963) The Bureaucratic phenomenon. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier M, Friedberg E (1977) Actors and systems: the politics of collective action. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Foissac R (9/2015) Sivens, pour comprendre. Un Autre Reg'Art, Albi (Sept 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forray N, Rathouis P (10/2014) Expertise du projet de barrage de Sivens (Tarn). Rapport n° 009953-01, Conseil Général de l’Environnement et du Développement Durable. Ministère de l’Ecologie, du Développement Durable et de l'Energie, Paris, 62 p. Available on https://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/144000641.pdf

  • Forray N, Roche P-A (1/2015) Mission pour un projet de territoire du bassin du Tescou (Midi-Pyrénées). Rapport n° 009953-02, Conseil Général de l'Environnement et du Développement Durable. Ministère de l’Ecologie, du Développement Durable et de l’Energie, Paris, 57 p. Available on http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/154000052.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • GéoDiag and Ecogéa (2007) Recensement des cours d’eau et des milieux aquatiques à « caractère patrimonial » sur le bassin Adour-Garonne – Cours d’eau remarquables. Agence de l'Eau Adour-Garonne, Toulouse, 28 p. Available on http://oai.eau-adour-garonne.fr/oai-documents/56542/GED_00000000.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Gilbert N (2004) Quality, quantity and the third way. In: Holland J, Campbell JR (eds) Methods in development research: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. ITDG Publications, London, pp 141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossetti M (2004) Sociologie de l’imprévisible - Dynamiques de l’activité et des formes sociales. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefetey B, Bové J (2/2015) Sivens, un barrage contre la démocratie. Les Petits Matins, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • LEMA (2006) Loi n°2006-1772 du 30 décembre 2006 sur l’eau et les milieux aquatiques. JORF n°303 (31/12/2006), texte n°3, p. 20285 sq. Available via http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/. Accessed 5 Feb 2018

  • Mercailloux L (2014) Le bassin Adour-Garonne manque d’eau. Les Echos, Prais (27/10/14)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard A (6/2015) Démocratie environnementale: débattre et décider - Rapport de la Commission spécialisée du Conseil national de la transition écologique sur la démocratisation du dialogue environnemental. Ministère de l'Ecologie, du Développement Durable et de l'Energie, Paris, 74 p. Available on http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/154000364/index.shtml. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • SCOP Sagne (2010) Retenue de Sivens - Caractérisation des zones humides. Conseil Général du Tarn, Albi, 15 p. Available on http://www.collectif-testet.org/uploaded/Etude-impact-EP-2012/Annexes-EI/annexe-4-rapportzh-na-1.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Sibertin-Blanc C (2016) Interplay of actors about the construction of a dam. CoMSES Computational Model Library. Available on https://www.openabm.org/model/5307/version/1. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Sibertin-Blanc C, El Gemayel J (2013) Boundedly rational agents playing the social actors game - how to reach coopération. In: O’Conner L (ed) Proceedings of 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT), Atlanta, November 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2013.135

  • Sibertin-Blanc C, Roggero P, Adreit F, Baldet B, Chapron P, El Gemayel J, Mailliard M, Sandri S (2013) SocLab: a framework for the modeling, simulation and analysis of power in social organizations. J Artif Societies Soc Simul 16(4):8. Available on http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/4/8.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Simon HA (1982) Models of bounded rationality: behavioral economics and business organization, vol 1 and 2. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Souchay G, Laimé M (2/2015) Sivens, le barrage de trop. Seuil-Reporterre, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Subra P (2014) Géopolitique de l'aménagement du territoire, 2de édition. A. Colin, coll. Perspectives Géopolitiques, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Therond O, Sibertin-Blanc C, Lardy R, Gaudou B, Balestrat M, Hong Y, Louail T, Mayor E, Nguyen VB, Panzoli D, Sanchez-Perez JM, Sauvage S, Taillandier P, Vavasseur M, Mazzega P (2014) Integrated modelling of social-ecological systems: the MAELIA high-resolution multi-agent platform to deal with water scarcity problems. In: Ames DP, Quinn NWT, Rizzoli AE (eds) International Environmental Modelling and Software Society 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software. San Diego, pp 1833–1840. Available via http://www.iemss.org/society/index.php/iemss-2014-proceedings. Accessed 8 Feb 2018

  • Truong N (2014) La résistance des renoncules. Le Monde, Paris (4/11/2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa-Vialaneix N, Sibertin-Blanc C, Roggero P (2014) Statistical exploratory analysis of agent-based simulations in a social context: using self-organizing maps to define a typology of behaviors. Case Stud Bus Ind Gov Stat CS-BIGS 5(2). Available on https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00940788/document. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • WFD (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Available via http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/. Accessed 8 Feb 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Sibertin-Blanc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

This form is used to collect data from actors in the field to quantify the model. We start by presenting to the interviewee the architecture of the model using Fig. 9.1 and the interpretation of the effects functions, so that he knows how his statements will be used to fill a column of Table 9.2.

  Interviewee: . . . . . . . . . . Resources
As model’s actor: . . . . . . . . . . R1 R2 - - -
1. What are the resources do you need to perform your tasks, to achieve your objectives? What does matter for you?    
2. On who do you depend to access the resource, to use it according to your own need? Who controls the resource? <actor name> <actor name> <actor name>
3. How much important is that resource for your own work (on a scale 0 … 10)?    
  What is the behavior of the person who controls the resource that would be (answers to the following questions will serve to draw the shape of effect functions):
4. a- the worst case for you? describe this behavior    
5. Assess the effect of this behavior on your capability to achieve your objectives (on a scale −10 … 0)    
6. b- the best case for you? describe this behavior    
7. Assess the effect (on a scale 0 … 10)    
8. c- the neutral case, neither favourable or unfavourable? describe this behavior    
9. Assess the effect (on a scale −10 … +10)    
10. d- the behavior that you experience usually?
describe this behavior
   
11. Assess the effect (on a scale −10 … +10)    
12. Who does matter for you?
  Favorably (on a scale 0 … 10) Actor XX: . . . . .
  Adversely (on a scale −10 … 0) Actor YY: . . . . .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sibertin-Blanc, C. (2019). Formal Analysis of the Conflictive Play of Actors Regarding the Building of a Dam. In: Boulet, R., Lajaunie, C., Mazzega, P. (eds) Law, Public Policies and Complex Systems: Networks in Action. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11506-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11506-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11505-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11506-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)