Advertisement

Encouraging Student Motivation Through Gamification in Engineering Education

  • Santiago Criollo-CEmail author
  • Sergio Luján-MoraEmail author
Conference paper
  • 213 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 909)

Abstract

At present, there is a wide variety of teaching methods and educational strategies mediated by technology: e-learning, m-learning, b-learning, gamification, flipped classroom, bring your own devices (BYOD), etc. This methodological variety creates an important student-participation space where challenges, problem solving and collaboration are put to the testing. Due to the need for communication, portability and ubiquity, several of these methods use mobile devices to achieve their goal. Laptops, smartphones and tablets, with access to wireless networks, can be used to improve teacher–student interaction and thereby stimulate students’ motivation, participation and active learning. Gamification is a teaching-learning strategy, which incorporates knowledge based on games that can support and mostly motivate the work of students and teachers. This document presents the results of a study using the Kahoot Platform, which is a web service of social and gamified education learning, in order to create evaluations changed into games of knowledge and competition among students. When it is used as a questionnaire, it challenges users to answer the questions posed, with a controlled response time, accumulated points, badges and a podium with the first five places. This leads to an active and dynamic learning due to the strong playful component, competitive and teamwork. The results of the research indicate that students improved participation and motivation in classes, besides checking that they had better results when working with mobile devices. These data will allow to analyze future perspectives about the use of the learning platform based on games as an assistance in the teaching-learning process.

Keywords

Active learning Dynamic learning Gamification Games M-learning Mobile learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Chaiyo, Y. (2017, March 1–4). The effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the student’s perception in the classrooms response system. In 2nd International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT), Chiang Mai, Thailand (pp. 178–182).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araújo, I. (2017, November 9–11). Empowering teachers to apply gamification. In International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prabawa H. (2017, October 25–26). Gamification development in attainment concept model learning for students’ comprehension enhancement. In 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), Bandung, Indonesia (pp. 685–689).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freeman, S. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abidin, H. (2017, November 9–10). Students’ perceptions on game-based classroom response system in a computer programming course. In 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kanazahua, Japon (pp. 8410–8415).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Antonio, S. (2017, , October 18–21). Gamification in education: A methodology to identify student’s profile. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Indianapolis, USA (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seralidou, E. (2018, April 17–20). Let’s learn With Kahoot!. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Sta Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain (pp. 683–691).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Correia, M. (2017, November 9–11). Game-based learning: The use of Kahoot in teacher education. In International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 0–3).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Godinho, W. (2017, June 21–24). Quizzes as an active learning strategy: A study with students of pharmaceutical sciences. In 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Lisboa, Portugal (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, A. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers and Education, 82, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    James, B. (2010). 21st century skills rethinking how students learn. Monroe, Indiana, USA: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de las AméricasQuitoEcuador
  2. 2.University of AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations