Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Bitcoin Trading Volume, Volatility, and Returns: A Study of Four Seasons

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2018)

Abstract

We study the relationship between Bitcoin trading volume, volatility, and returns using financial data for the period July 2010–November 2017. When we compare the raw annualized volatility of the Bitcoin exchange rate against common currencies, we observe that Bitcoin’s is higher. However, when the volume of Bitcoin transactions is considered, the volatility of the Bitcoin stabilizes significantly. Then we divide our sample into four distinct time periods, defined by three important events, namely, the loss of public confidence in the banking system in 2013, the MtGox Bitcoin Exchange hack in early 2014, and the introduction of the Bitcoin legislation in Japan in April 2017. Using asymmetric EGARCH models with the lag of the natural logarithm of the volume of the Bitcoin both as a regressor in the mean equation as well as in the specification of the conditional variance as multiplicative heteroskedasticity we show that volume and volatility are related after 2013, and volume and returns are related before the MtGox hack, positively and significantly. Further, during the euphoric period between the beginning of 2013 and up to the MtGox hack an unexpected rise in Bitcoin returns increases Bitcoin volatility more than an unexpected, equally sized decrease (asymmetry).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    During the first quarter of 2014 the exchange rate of Bitcoin had decreased to $298.73 from $1,128.47 since November 2013. Adverse events such as the closing of the Mount Gox Exchange and the negative outlook from the Chinese government have all played a role in damaging the performance of Bitcoin.

  2. 2.

    The data for the Bitcoin exchange rate as well as the exchange rate of all other currencies was used from the Federal Reserve, www.quandl.com and www.oanda.com. Volume data is available from the 14th of September 2011.

  3. 3.

    Assuming that there are 252 trading days in the year.

  4. 4.

    www.cryptocoinsnews.com.

References

  • Amihud, Y.: Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. J. Financ. Mark. 5(1), 31–56 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H.: Liquidity and stock returns. Financ. Anal. J. 42(3), 43–48 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcilar, M., Bouri, E., Gupta, R., Roubaud, D.: Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach. Econ. Model. 64, 74–81 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur, D.G., Dimpfl, T.: Excess volatility as an impediment for a digital currency (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur, D.G., Glover, K.: A gold bubble? (No. 175) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T., Kretschmer, U., Pigorsch, C., Tauchen, G.: A discrete-time model for daily S and P500 returns and realized variations: jumps and leverage effects. J. Econ. 150(2), 151–166 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bouri, E., Azzi, G., Dyhrberg, A.H.: On the return-volatility relationship in the Bitcoin market around the price crash of 2013. Econ.-Open-Access Open-Assess. E-J. 11, 1–16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R., Kearney, C.: Do trading volumes explain the persistence of GARCH effects? Appl. Financ. Econ. 22, 1993–2008 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.692871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cermak, V.: Can Bitcoin become a viable alternative to fiat currencies? An empirical analysis of Bitcoin’s volatility based on a GARCH model (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (ECB): Virtual Schemes (2012). www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/virtualcurrencyschemes201210en.pdf

  • Gervais, S., Kaniel, R., Mingelgrin, D.H.: The high-volume return premium. J. Financ. 56(3), 877–919 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghysels, E., Santa-Clara, P., Valkanov, R.: There is a risk-return trade- off after all. J. Financ. Econ. 76(3), 509–548 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R., Runkle, D.E.: On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J. Financ. 48, 1779–1801 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., Zhang, H.H.: An investigation of the risk and return relation at long horizons. Rev. Econ. Stat. 81(3), 399–408 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R.C., Lutkepohl, H., Lee, T.C.: The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J.M.: The relation between price changes and trading volume: a survey. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 22, 109–126 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2307/2330874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, D.: Evolution of Bitcoin-volatility comparisons with least developed countries’ currencies (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khairuddin, I.E., Sas, C., Clinch, S., Davies, N.: Exploring motivations for Bitcoin technology usage. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2872–2878. ACM, May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutmos, G., Booth, G.G.: Asymmetric volatility transmission in international stock markets. J. Int. Money Financ. 14, 747–762 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Wu, C.: Stochastic volatility, liquidity and intraday information flow. Appl. Econ. Lett. 18(16), 1511–1515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2010.543077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W.: A liquidity-augmented capital asset pricing model. J. Financ. Econ. 82, 631–671 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigson, S.C., Ng, S.: The empirical risk–return relation: a factor analysis approach. J. Financ. Econ. 83(1), 171–222 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.M.: Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. J. Financ. 32(4), 1151–1168 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, K., Pyun, C.S., Avard, S.L.: Asymmetric reverting behavior of short-horizon stock returns: an evidence of stock market overreaction. J. Bank. Financ. 25(4), 807–824 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D.B.: Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59, 347–370 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, M.: Market Microstructure Theory. Blackwell, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J.C., Li, C.H.: How Bad is Bad News; How Good is Good News? Bank of Canada (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G.W.: Stock market volatility. Financ. Anal. J. 46(3), 23–34 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B.: The rise and fall of Bitcoin. Wired, 23 November (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L.: Reverse return-volatility asymmetry, and short sale constraints: evidence from the Chinese markets. Presented at the EFMA Annual Meeting 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D.: Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal. In: Handbook of Digital Currency, pp. 31–43 (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelika Kokkinaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kokkinaki, A., Sapuric, S., Georgiou, I. (2019). The Relationship Between Bitcoin Trading Volume, Volatility, and Returns: A Study of Four Seasons. In: Themistocleous, M., Rupino da Cunha, P. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11395-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11394-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11395-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics