Skip to main content

State-Investor Contracts and Human Rights: Taking a Critical Look at Transparency and Participation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights in the Extractive Industries

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights ((CHREN,volume 3))

  • 821 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the topic of state-investor contracts from a human rights perspective, focusing in particular on transparency and participation. Firstly, the role and function of state-investor contracts in the extractive industries is considered, focusing predominantly on mining in Africa. Secondly, five key human rights issues associated with state-investor contracts are examined and discussed, namely: (1) human rights coverage in state-investor contracts; (2) asymmetry in capacity and information of negotiating parties; (3) stabilisation clauses and regulatory chill; (4) transparency, public sector oversight and monitoring; and (5) access to remedy and dispute settlement. It is argued that the use of the generally applicable law to govern extractive industries foreign direct investment projects, rather than state-investor contracts, should be encouraged as this provides opportunities for greater transparency and participation for impacted rights-holders and other stakeholders in the way that agreements governing such projects are negotiated and implemented. Furthermore, opportunities exist to enhance transparency and participation in the use of state-investor contracts, which should be realised irrespective of whether a jurisdiction favours a contractual or licensing regime. The chapter concludes by highlighting key opportunities for improving transparency and participation in state-investor contract negotiation and implementation, whilst noting that any such opportunities should be realised in the context of broader reform considerations regarding extractive industries governance for sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thomas Reuters Practical Law, Glossary: Host Government Agreement, https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-501-4985?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1 (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  2. 2.

    In this chapter defined as the exploration and exploitation of mineral, oil and natural gas reserves—with the primary focus being on mining in Africa.

  3. 3.

    Defined here as the manner in which power and authority are exercised for sustainable development, including by promoting transparency, accountability, fairness and ownership—based on international human rights standards and principles.

  4. 4.

    Thomas Reuters Practical Law, Glossary: Host Government Agreement, https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-501-4985?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1 (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  5. 5.

    A “host state” is usually defined as the state in which an FDI project is implemented, whereas a “home state” is the state in which the business enterprise is incorporated or has its primary location.

  6. 6.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7.

  7. 7.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7.

  8. 8.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 18.

  9. 9.

    See e.g., Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  10. 10.

    See also the contribution by Frank in this volume.

  11. 11.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7; Smaller C, The IISD Guide to Negotiating Investment Contracts for Farmland and Water. IISD, November 2014, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/iisd-guide-negotiating-investment-contracts-farmland-water_1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018); UN Human Rights Council, Principles for Responsible Contracts. Integrating the Management of Human Rights Risks into State-Investor Contract Negotiations. Guidance for Negotiators, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3, 21 March 2011.

  12. 12.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7.

  13. 13.

    Halland et al. (2015), p. 71; Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 14.

  14. 14.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7.

  15. 15.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7.

  16. 16.

    Creative Commons, Mining Contracts: How to Read and Understand Them. International Senior Lawyers Project and Open Oil and Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment and Natural Resources Governance Institute, June 2014, https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1279596/mining-contracts-how-to-read-and-understand-them.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 102.

  17. 17.

    Creative Commons, Mining Contracts: How to Read and Understand Them. International Senior Lawyers Project and Open Oil and Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment and Natural Resources Governance Institute, June 2014, https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1279596/mining-contracts-how-to-read-and-understand-them.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 12; Halland et al. (2015), p. 71.

  18. 18.

    Creative Commons, Mining Contracts: How to Read and Understand Them. International Senior Lawyers Project and Open Oil and Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment and Natural Resources Governance Institute, June 2014, https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1279596/mining-contracts-how-to-read-and-understand-them.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 12; Halland et al. (2015), p. 71; Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7.

  19. 19.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 16.

  20. 20.

    Dietsche E, Mineral Taxation Regimes. A review of issues and challenges in their design and application. Commonwealth Secretariat and International Council on Mining and Metals, Feburary 2009, https://www.icmm.com/website/publications/pdfs/social-and-economic-development/minerals-taxation-regimes (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 32.

  21. 21.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7.

  22. 22.

    See e.g., Halland et al. (2015), p. 58.

  23. 23.

    Halland et al. (2015), p. 71; Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 12.

  24. 24.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7.

  25. 25.

    See e.g., Dietsche E, Mineral Taxation Regimes. A review of issues and challenges in their design and application. Commonwealth Secretariat and International Council on Mining and Metals, Feburary 2009, https://www.icmm.com/website/publications/pdfs/social-and-economic-development/minerals-taxation-regimes (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 9; Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 12; Sachs et al. (2013), p. 367.

  26. 26.

    Dietsche E, Mineral Taxation Regimes. A review of issues and challenges in their design and application. Commonwealth Secretariat and International Council on Mining and Metals, Feburary 2009, https://www.icmm.com/website/publications/pdfs/social-and-economic-development/minerals-taxation-regimes (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 9.

  27. 27.

    Halland et al. (2015), p. 71.

  28. 28.

    Halland et al. (2015), p. 71; Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 16.

  29. 29.

    Based on: Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 16.

  30. 30.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 16.

  31. 31.

    Barma NH et al., Rents to Riches? The Political Economy of Natural Resource-Led Development. World Bank, 2012, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/545221468150583397/pdf/659570PUB0EPI10737B0Rents0to0Riches.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018); Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Outcome, Governing Natural Resources. Lessons learned from good governance initiatives for extractive industry investments and large land-based agricultural investment, 11 November 2014, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/11/Governing-Natural-Resources-Outcome-Note-Columbia-Center-on-Sustainable-Investment-1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 6; Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 16; Williams (2012), p. 422.

  32. 32.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 8.

  33. 33.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 8.

  34. 34.

    International Bar Association, Model Mine Development Agreement, 4 April 2011, http://www.mmdaproject.org/presentations/MMDA1_0_110404Bookletv3.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  35. 35.

    Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Outcome, Governing Natural Resources. Lessons learned from good governance initiatives for extractive industry investments and large land-based agricultural investment, 11 November 2014, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/11/Governing-Natural-Resources-Outcome-Note-Columbia-Center-on-Sustainable-Investment-1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 6.

  36. 36.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 8.

  37. 37.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 8.

  38. 38.

    See e.g., Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 12; Smaller C, The IISD Guide to Negotiating Investment Contracts for Farmland and Water. IISD, November 2014, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/iisd-guide-negotiating-investment-contracts-farmland-water_1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  39. 39.

    See also the chapter by Feldt in this volume.

  40. 40.

    EITI, Contract Transparency in EITI Countries. A Review on How Countries Report on Government’s Contract Transparency Policy, August 2015, https://eiti.org/sites/default/files/documents/eiti_brief_on_contract_transparency.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  41. 41.

    EITI, Guidance notes and standard terms of reference, https://eiti.org/guidance (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  42. 42.

    EITI, Guidance Note 7. Contract Transparency, September 2017, https://eiti.org/sites/default/files/documents/guidance-note-7-contract-transparency.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  43. 43.

    EITI, Contract Transparency in EITI Countries. A Review on How Countries Report on Government’s Contract Transparency Policy, August 2015, https://eiti.org/sites/default/files/documents/eiti_brief_on_contract_transparency.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 13–14.

  44. 44.

    Open Government Partnership, Theme: Natural Resources, https://www.opengovpartnership.org/theme/natural-resources-0 (last accessed 1 October 2018). To become a member of the OGP, participating countries must endorse a high-level Open Government Declaration, deliver a country action plan developed in consultation with the public, and commit to independent reporting on their progress going forward.

  45. 45.

    IFC, IFC’s priorities in oil, gas and mining, http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/industry_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/ogm+home/priorities (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  46. 46.

    IMF, Guidance on Resource Revenue Transparency, 2007, https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/2007/eng/101907g.pdf, p. 6.

  47. 47.

    NRGI, Natural Resource Charter. Second Edition, 2014, https://resourcegovernance.org/approach/natural-resource-charter (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  48. 48.

    UN Human Rights Council, UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31, 21 March 2011.

  49. 49.

    See e.g., UN General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UN Doc. A/RES/70/1, 21 October 2015; UN, Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform: Mining. 15 October 2015, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/mining (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  50. 50.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018); Mitchell L, Natural Resource Contracts: A Practical Guide. Environmental Law Alliance World, https://www.elaw.org/sites/default/files/images_content/general_page_images/publications/Natural_Resource_Contracts_Guide.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  51. 51.

    See e.g., Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 282; Gordon (2008).

  52. 52.

    See e.g., UN Human Rights Council, Principles for Responsible Contracts. Integrating the Management of Human Rights Risks into State-Investor Contract Negotiations. Guidance for Negotiators, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3, 21 March 2011.

  53. 53.

    UN Human Rights Council, Principles for Responsible Contracts. Integrating the Management of Human Rights Risks into State-Investor Contract Negotiations. Guidance for Negotiators, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3, 21 March 2011.

  54. 54.

    UN Human Rights Council, Principles for Responsible Contracts. Integrating the Management of Human Rights Risks into State-Investor Contract Negotiations. Guidance for Negotiators, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3, 21 March 2011, p. 20.

  55. 55.

    UN Human Rights Council, Principles for Responsible Contracts. Integrating the Management of Human Rights Risks into State-Investor Contract Negotiations. Guidance for Negotiators, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3, 21 March 2011, p. 6.

  56. 56.

    UN Human Rights Council, Principles for Responsible Contracts. Integrating the Management of Human Rights Risks into State-Investor Contract Negotiations. Guidance for Negotiators, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3, 21 March 2011, p. 22.

  57. 57.

    Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 286.

  58. 58.

    Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Background Paper for Second Workshop on Contract Negotiation Support for Developing Host Countries. 18–19 July 2012, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/Background_Paper_for_July_18-19_Negotiation_Assistance_Workshop.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 27; Halland et al. (2015), p. 58.

  59. 59.

    Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Background Paper for Second Workshop on Contract Negotiation Support for Developing Host Countries. 18–19 July 2012, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/Background_Paper_for_July_18-19_Negotiation_Assistance_Workshop.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 5; Halland et al. (2015), p. 58.

  60. 60.

    See e.g., Halland et al. (2015), p. 58; Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 59.

  61. 61.

    World Bank, Building Negotiating Capacity in Africa to Make the Most from Mining Deals. 5 February 2015, http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/02/05/building-negotiating-capacity-in-africa-to-make-the-most-from-mining-deals (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  62. 62.

    IUCN (2015), Building capacity for better negotiating skills: an inspiring solution for Africa. 8 April 2015, https://www.iucn.org/content/building-capacity-better-negotiation-skills-inspiring-solution-africa (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  63. 63.

    See Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Background Paper for Second Workshop on Contract Negotiation Support for Developing Host Countries. 18–19 July 2012, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/Background_Paper_for_July_18-19_Negotiation_Assistance_Workshop.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), for a useful overview of technical support services available.

  64. 64.

    See Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Background Paper for Second Workshop on Contract Negotiation Support for Developing Host Countries. 18–19 July 2012, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/Background_Paper_for_July_18-19_Negotiation_Assistance_Workshop.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  65. 65.

    UN Human Rights Council, Principles for Responsible Contracts. Integrating the Management of Human Rights Risks into State-Investor Contract Negotiations. Guidance for Negotiators, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3, 21 March 2011.

  66. 66.

    Götzmann N and Jensen M H, Human Rights and State Investor Contracts. Danish Institute for Human Rights. January 2014, https://www.humanrights.dk/sites/humanrights.dk/files/media/dokumenter/udgivelser/human_rights_and_stateinvestor_contracts_2014.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  67. 67.

    Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Background Paper for Second Workshop on Contract Negotiation Support for Developing Host Countries. 18–19 July 2012, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/Background_Paper_for_July_18-19_Negotiation_Assistance_Workshop.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 8.

  68. 68.

    Cited in Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 20.

  69. 69.

    See also the chapter by Frank in this volume.

  70. 70.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 4.

  71. 71.

    See e.g., Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 5–9.

  72. 72.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 22.

  73. 73.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 24–25.

  74. 74.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 35–36.

  75. 75.

    See e.g., Cotula (2014), p. 20; Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 10; Tienhaara (2006), p. 75.

  76. 76.

    Ingolfsson S H, Stabilisation Clauses in Investment Agreement: A Human Rights and Development Perspective. Graduate Thesis for the Lund University, 2012, http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=3359538&fileOId=3403760 (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 54.

  77. 77.

    Sornarajah (2004), p. 408; Tienhaara (2006), p. 84.

  78. 78.

    See e.g., UN Economic and Social Council, Human Rights, Trade and Investment. Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/9, 2 July 2003, pp. 3–4, 20–21, 30–32.

  79. 79.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 10.

  80. 80.

    Frank (2015), p. 88. See also Cameron P D, Stabilisation in Investment Contracts and Changes of Rules in Host Countries: Tools for Oil & Gas Investors. Association of International Petroleum Negotiators, 5 July 2006, https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/wp-content/uploads/arbitrationlaw4-Stabilisation-Paper.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 12; Mann H, Stabilisation in Investment Contracts: Rethinking the Context, Reformulating the Result. IISD, 7 October 2011, https://www.iisd.org/itn/2011/10/07/stabilization-in-investment-contracts-rethinking-the-context-reformulating-the-result/ (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  81. 81.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 40.

  82. 82.

    Cotula L, Regulatory Takings, Stabilisation Clauses and Sustainable Development. Global Forum on International Investment VII. 27–28 March 2008, http://www.oecd.org/investment/globalforum/40311122.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 13; Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 27.

  83. 83.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 40.

  84. 84.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 40.

  85. 85.

    Shemberg A, Stabilisation Clauses and Human Rights. 27 May 2009, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 40.

  86. 86.

    See e.g., Halland et al. (2015), pp. 57, 71.

  87. 87.

    See e.g., Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 12.

  88. 88.

    UN Conference on Trade and Development, Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development, UN Doc. UNCTAD/DIAE/PCB/2015/5, 2015, p. 101. Whilst the Framework primarily addresses international investment treaties, rather than state-investor contracts, it includes a broad investment policy focus, the principles of which, by implication, can also be read as relevant to state-investor contracts.

  89. 89.

    World Bank et al., Resource Contracts, http://www.resourcecontracts.org/ (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  90. 90.

    Desai and Jarvis (2012), p. 118.

  91. 91.

    UN Human Rights Council, Principles for Responsible Contracts. Integrating the Management of Human Rights Risks into State-Investor Contract Negotiations. Guidance for Negotiators, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31/Add.3, 21 March 2011, p. 23.

  92. 92.

    See also the chapter by Frank in this volume.

  93. 93.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 25.

  94. 94.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 26.

  95. 95.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 26.

  96. 96.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 26.

  97. 97.

    Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 286.

  98. 98.

    Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 284.

  99. 99.

    Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 287. See also Rosenblum P and Maples S, Contracts Confidential: Ending Secret Deals in the Extractive Industries. Revenue Watch. 2009, https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/RWI-Contracts-Confidential.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 17–18.

  100. 100.

    IMF, Guidance on Resource Revenue Transparency. 2007, https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/2007/eng/101907g.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 17. See also Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 287; Halland et al. (2015), p. 73.

  101. 101.

    See e.g., Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 289; Rosenblum P and Maples S, Contracts Confidential: Ending Secret Deals in the Extractive Industries. Revenue Watch, 2009, https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/RWI-Contracts-Confidential.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  102. 102.

    See e.g Halland et al. (2015), p. 71; Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 12.

  103. 103.

    Halland et al. (2015), p. 68.

  104. 104.

    Halland et al. (2015), p. 68.

  105. 105.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 26.

  106. 106.

    Desai and Jarvis (2012), p. 120. See also Acosta A M, Annex 4. Natural Resource Governance. Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives. Transparency & Accountability Initiative, 2010, http://www.transparencyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/impacts_annex4_final1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 4; Besada H and Martin P, Mining Codes in Africa: Emergence of a “Fourth” Generation?. The North-South Institute, May 2013, http://www.nsi-ins.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Mining-Codes-in-Africa-Report-Hany.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 22; Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 287.

  107. 107.

    See e.g., Acosta A M, Annex 4. Natural Resource Governance. Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives. Transparency & Accountability Initiative, 2010, http://www.transparencyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/impacts_annex4_final1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 7; Desai and Jarvis (2012), pp. 109–110, speaking about transparency initiatives in natural resources management generally.

  108. 108.

    Acosta A M, Annex 4. Natural Resource Governance. Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives. Transparency & Accountability Initiative, 2010, http://www.transparency-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/impacts_annex4_final1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 4–5; Hilson and Maconachie (2008), pp. 57, 91.

  109. 109.

    Acosta A M, Annex 4. Natural Resource Governance. Review of Impact and Effectiveness of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives. Transparency & Accountability Initiative, 2010, http://www.transparency-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/impacts_annex4_final1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 11; Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 284; Desai and Jarvis (2012), pp. 101, 110, 127.

  110. 110.

    Kienzler D et al., Natural Resources Contracts as a Tool for Managing the Mining Sector. Federal Ministy for Economic Cooperation and Development Germany, June 2015, https://www.bmz.de/g7/includes/Downloadarchiv/Natural_Resource_Contracts.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 27.

  111. 111.

    Andrews (2016), p. 68.

  112. 112.

    Dietsche E, Mineral Taxation Regimes. A review of issues and challenges in their design and application. Commonwealth Secretariat and International Council on Mining and Metals, Feburary 2009, https://www.icmm.com/website/publications/pdfs/social-and-economic-development/minerals-taxation-regimes (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 9.

  113. 113.

    Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 284.

  114. 114.

    Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 302; Halland et al. (2015), p. 74; Hilson and Maconachie (2008), p. 57.

  115. 115.

    Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 284; Desai and Jarvis (2012), pp. 101, 127.

  116. 116.

    Desai and Jarvis (2012), pp. 101, 127; Hilson and Maconachie (2008), pp. 71, 84.

  117. 117.

    See e.g., Desai and Jarvis (2012), p. 125: “Such information enables those affected to know whom to hold to account for what terms, and is the first step to building capacity more effectively to monitor the implementation of those terms, complementing existing government regulatory functions.” See also Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 287.

  118. 118.

    See e.g., Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), pp. 282, 287; Gathii and Odumosu-Ayanu (2015), pp. 70–71, 92.

  119. 119.

    Gathii and Odumosu-Ayanu (2015), p. 72.

  120. 120.

    See e.g., Cotula and Tienhaara (2013), p. 303; Gathii and Odumosu-Ayanu (2015), pp. 78, 85, 90.

  121. 121.

    See e.g., Johnson and Volkov (2013), pp. 370–371.

  122. 122.

    Cordes K and Johnson L and Szoke-Burke S, Land Deal Dilemmas: Grievances, Human Rights and Investor Protection. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, March 2016, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2016/03/CCSI_Land-deal-dilemmas.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 17; Marshall F, Risks for Host States of the Entwining of Investment Treaty Contract Claims. IISD, August 2009, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/best_practices_bulletin_4.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 1.

  123. 123.

    Marshall F, Risks for Host States of the Entwining of Investment Treaty Contract Claims. IISD, August 2009, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/best_practices_bulletin_4.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 1, 15; Mann H and Smaller C, Foreign Land Purchase for Agriculture: What Impact on Sustainable Development?. United Nations. Sustainable Development Innovation Briefs Issue 8, January 2010, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/no8.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 4.

  124. 124.

    See e.g., Cordes K and Johnson L and Szoke-Burke S, Land Deal Dilemmas: Grievances, Human Rights and Investor Protection. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, March 2016, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2016/03/CCSI_Land-deal-dilemmas.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 14; Marshall F, Risks for Host States of the Entwining of Investment Treaty Contract Claims. IISD, August 2009, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/best_practices_bulletin_4.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 11–15.

  125. 125.

    Cordes K and Johnson L and Szoke-Burke S, Land Deal Dilemmas: Grievances, Human Rights and Investor Protection. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, March 2016, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2016/03/CCSI_Land-deal-dilemmas.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 2. See also Johnson L and Coleman J, International Investment Law and the Extractive Industries Sector. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, January 2016 http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2016/01/2016-01-12_Investment-Law-and-Extractives_Briefing-Note_1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 10.

  126. 126.

    Cordes K and Johnson L and Szoke-Burke S, Land Deal Dilemmas: Grievances, Human Rights and Investor Protection. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, March 2016, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2016/03/CCSI_Land-deal-dilemmas.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 2, noting also that there are in fact examples where “even in the absence of a stabilisation clause, some investment arbitration tribunals have determined that promises of legal stability can be implied in certain circumstances.”

  127. 127.

    Marshall F, Risks for Host States of the Entwining of Investment Treaty Contract Claims. IISD, August 2009, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/best_practices_bulletin_4.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 1, 12; Mitchell L, Natural Resource Contracts: A Practical Guide. Environmental Law Alliance World, https://www.elaw.org/sites/default/files/images_content/general_page_images/publications/Natural_Resource_Contracts_Guide.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 46.

  128. 128.

    See e.g., Caron D, Light and Dark in International Arbitration: The Virtues, Risks and Limits of Transparency. The 9th Kaplan Lecture, 10 December 2015, http://neil-kaplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2016_10_06-Caron-Light-and-Dark.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 6; Marshall F, Risks for Host States of the Entwining of Investment Treaty Contract Claims. IISD, August 2009, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/best_practices_bulletin_4.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 1; Tienhaara (2006).

  129. 129.

    See e.g., Myburgh (2016), p. 599, indicating that the estimate lies at 80% of international contracts containing recourse to international commercial arbitration.

  130. 130.

    Myburgh (2016), pp. 597, 599.

  131. 131.

    See e.g., Myburgh (2016), pp. 600–601.

  132. 132.

    Choudhury (2008), p. 792.

  133. 133.

    Choudhury (2008), p. 784.

  134. 134.

    OECD, Transparency and Third Party Participation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Procedures. OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2005/01, June 2005, https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2005_1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 2.

  135. 135.

    See e.g., Tienhaara (2006).

  136. 136.

    Tienhaara (2006), p. 76.

  137. 137.

    OECD, Transparency and Third Party Participation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Procedures. OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2005/01, June 2005, https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2005_1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), p. 3.

  138. 138.

    See e.g., Choudhury (2008), pp. 786–787; Tienhaara (2006), p. 76.

  139. 139.

    See e.g., Johnson L and Coleman J, International Investment Law and the Extractive Industries Sector. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, January 2016 http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2016/01/2016-01-12_Investment-Law-and-Extractives_Briefing-Note_1.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 6–7, for a useful overview of the differences between domestic court systems and international investment arbitration.

  140. 140.

    Choudhury (2008), pp. 787–788.

  141. 141.

    Tienhaara (2006), p. 77.

  142. 142.

    Stewart cited in Choudhury (2008), p. 788.

  143. 143.

    Garcia (2004), p. 352.

  144. 144.

    See e.g., Tienhaara (2006), for a useful and comprehensive overview of these issues.

  145. 145.

    See e.g., Choudhury (2008), pp. 787–788; Dolzer (2005), pp. 953, 957.

  146. 146.

    UN Information Service, Press release: UNCITRAL to consider possible reform of investor-state dispute settlement, 14 July 2017, http://www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/en/pressrels/2017/unisl250.html (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  147. 147.

    The Rules apply to cases arising under relevant investment treaties concluded after 1 April 2014; the United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (the “Mauritius Convention on Transparency”) provides the mechanism for the application of these rules to cases concluded before 1 April 2014 and will enter into force in October 2017. See UN Commission on International Trade Law, United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration, 10 December 2014, http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/uncitral_texts/arbitration/2014Transparency_Convention.html (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  148. 148.

    ICSID, Amendment of ICSID’s Rules and Regulations, https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Pages/about/Amendment-of-ICSID-Rules-and-Regulations.aspx (last accessed 1 October 2018).

  149. 149.

    For a useful summary of potential reform measures see e.g., Choudhury (2008), pp. 807–830; Pahis S, Bilateral Investment Treaties and International Human Rights Law: Harmonization through Interpretation. International Commission of Jurists, 2011, https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/treaties-law-interpretation-themetic-report-2012.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018), pp. 43–47; Sauvant (2016).

References

  • Andrews N (2016) A Swiss-Army knife? A critical assessment of the extractive industries transparency initiative in Ghana. Bus Soc Rev 121(1):59–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury B (2008) Recapturing public power: is investment arbitration’s engagement of the public interest contributing to the democratic deficit? Vanderbilt J Transnatl Law 41:775–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotula L (2014) Do investment treaties unduly constrain regulatory space? Questions Int Law 9:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotula L, Tienhaara K (2013) Reconfiguring investment contracts to promote sustainable development. In: Sauvant K (ed) Yearbook on international investment law and policy 2011–2012. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 281–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai D, Jarvis M (2012) Governance and accountability in extractive industries: theory and practice at the World Bank. J Energy Nat Resour Law 30(2):101–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolzer R (2005) The impact of international investment treaties on domestic administrative law. NYU J Int Law Polit 37:953–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank S (2015) Stabilisation clauses and FDI: presumptions versus realities. J World Invest Trade 16(1):88–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia CG (2004) All the other dirty little secrets: investment treaties, Latin America, and the necessary evil of investor-state arbitration. Florida J Int Law 16:301–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathii J, Odumosu-Ayanu I (2015) The turn to contractual responsibility in the global extractive industry. Bus Hum Rights J 1(1):69–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon K (2008) International investment agreements: a survey of environmental, labour and anti-corruption issues. In: Yannaca-Small C (ed) International investment law: understanding concepts and tracking innovations. OECD, Paris, pp 135–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Halland H, Lokanc M, Nair A, Kannan SP (2015) The extractive industries sector: essentials for economists, public finance professionals, and policy makers. World Bank, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilson G, Maconachie R (2008) “Good governance” and the extractive industries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 30(1):52–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L, Volkov O (2013) Investor-state contracts, host-state “commitments” and the myth of stability in international law. Am Rev Int Arbitr 24(3):361–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Myburgh A (2016) Does international commercial arbitration promote FDI? J Law Econ 59(3):597–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L, Toledano P, Mandelbaum J, Otto J (2013) Impacts of fiscal reforms on country attractiveness: learning from the facts. In: Sauvant K (ed) Yearbook in international investment law and policy 2011–2012. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 345–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvant K (2016) The evolving international investment law and policy regime: ways forward. Invest Bridges Africa 5(5):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sornarajah M (2004) The international law on foreign investment, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tienhaara K (2006) What you don’t know can hurt you: investor-state disputes and the protection of the environment in developing countries. Global Environ Polit 6(4):73–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P (2012) Global trends and tribulations in mining regulation. J Energy Nat Resour Law 30(4):391–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would sincerely like to thank Kaitlin Cordes, Mads Holst Jensen, Lise Johnson and Andrea Shemberg for their helpful comments on an earlier draft, as well as William Oon for his research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nora Götzmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Götzmann, N. (2019). State-Investor Contracts and Human Rights: Taking a Critical Look at Transparency and Participation. In: Feichtner, I., Krajewski, M., Roesch, R. (eds) Human Rights in the Extractive Industries. Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11382-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11382-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11381-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11382-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics