Prospects for the Integration of Environmental Innovation Management on the Platform of Information and Communication Technologies

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 908)


The management structure of a large commodity company is very complex, which causes problems in communications, in coordinating management actions, and there is a danger of distortion and loss of information. Particular difficulties begin when combining environmental and innovation management. Solving the problems of environmental innovation management is much easier on the information and communication technology platform. The goal of the contribution is to develop an information flow management algorithm when introducing environmental innovation management. The leading method for the study of this problem is the method of modeling, which allows considering this problem as a focused and organized process of integrating environmental innovation management, subject to the application of information technology. As a result of the study, it is possible to single out the conclusions obtained in the course of analyzing the state and trends in the development of the digital economy in Russia and abroad, as well as its role in the implementation of environmental innovation management. An algorithm is proposed for the use of information flows in the implementation of environmental management at large oil companies, highlighting four levels of negative environmental impact. The practical significance of the contribution is the possibility of using the proposed approach in practical activities of large oil companies in implementing innovation integrated management practices at all levels, including top management.


Digital economy Digitalization Ecology Information and communication technologies Innovations Vertically integrated companies 


  1. 1.
    Berisha-Shaqiri A (2015) Information technology and the digital economy. Mediterr J Soc Sci 78–83.
  2. 2.
    Aptekman A, Kalabin V (2017) Digital Russia: a new reality. McKinsey Global Institute, p 133. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  3. 3.
    Ciocoiu Carmen Nadia (2011) Integrating digital economy and green economy: opportunities for sustainable development. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  4. 4.
    Dietrich EH, Khanna M, Thomas LP (2017) Corporate environmental strategies in emerging economies. Rev Environ Econ Policy 8:164–185. Accessed 30 Mar 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Federal State Statistics Service. Indicators of innovation activity: 2018: statistical compilation (2018) Gorodnikova NV, Gokhberg LM, Ditkovsky KA and others; Higher School of Economics. - Moscow: HSE, ISBN 978-5-7598-1742-0Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forrester SV, Ustinova GH, Kosyakova IV, Ronzhina NV, Suraeva MO (2016) Human capital in innovative conditions. Int Electron J Math Educ 11(8):3048–3065Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gunkov AG, Kholopov YA (2017) Environmental management of the enterprise. Bull SamGUPS 1(35):80–83Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korolev I (2018) The state will spend 436 billion dollars on the ICT infrastructure. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  9. 9.
    Kosyakova IV, Kudryashov AV (2016) Methodical approach to managing the environmental aspect of a vertically integrated company. Prof Sci 5:14–24Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kudryashov AV (2016) Managerial approach to assessing the negative environmental impact of a vertically integrated company. UEKS 12:94. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  11. 11.
    Lopatin VN (2018) Information security risks in the transition to a digital economy. State Law 3:77–88Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medvedev D (2018) Order of March 29, 2018 No. 528-p. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  13. 13.
    Pakhomova NV, Sergienko OI (2016) Innovations of environmentally sustainable development: the situation in Russia in the context of international experience. In: Problems of the modern economy, vol 1–2, pp 247–254Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pukha Y (2018) Industry 4.0: global digital operations Study 2018. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  15. 15.
    Review of the digital agenda in the world (2018) Website of the Eurasian Economic Union. Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  16. 16.
    Sahin F, Koksal O, Garbus S (2014) Revisiting of theory X and Y: a multilevel analysis of the effects of leaders’ managerial assumptions on followers’ attitudes. Manag Decis 10:1888–1906. Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Environmental Performance Index (2018) Accessed 30 Mar 2018
  18. 18.
    Van der Linden N, Hols M, Berends J, Bos B (2018) Digital economy and society index (DESI) 2018. Accessed 30 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Samara State Technical UniversitySamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations