Skip to main content

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diseases of the Aorta

Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Rupture of an AAA is a catastrophic event that leads to death in 80–90% of patients overall, including 50–70% of patients that reach medical attention. AAA can be described by their location and/or morphologic features. The pathophysiology is driven by abnormalities in the connective tissue of the aortic wall, namely elastin. While abnormalities in elastin lead to aneurysm formation, disruption of collagen in the aortic wall is what ultimately leads to rupture.

Major risk factors for this entity include smoking, advanced age, male gender, and family history. There are a variety of modalities that are used to image abdominal aortic aneurysms. Most commonly, ultrasound is used and is recommended by several societies for screening patients at risk of this disease. While behavioral modifications are recommended in patients with AAA to improve overall cardiac health, the mainstay of management is aneurysm repair. Generally, repair of an AAA is considered once it is ≥5.0 cm. Current options for intervention include open surgical repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Large randomized trials to date thus far suggest that while EVAR has improved perioperative mortality, long-term mortality outcomes appear to be better in patients that undergo surgical repair. Surveillance imaging with CT is recommended in patients that undergo open surgical repair of an AAA to assess for paranastomotic aneurysm formation, while CT or ultrasound surveillance is performed in patient post-EVAR to assess for endoleak formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

18F-FDG:

18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose

AAA:

Abdominal aortic aneurysm

ACE:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme

ADAM:

Aneurysm Detection and Management

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CAESAR:

Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair

CEUS:

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

CI:

Confidence interval

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CTA:

Computed tomographic angiography

DREAM:

Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management

DUS:

Duplex ultrasound

EVAR:

Endovascular aneurysm repair

FAST:

Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma

HR:

Hazard ratio

IAAA:

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm

MMP:

Matrix metalloproteinases

MRA:

Magnetic resonance angiography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

OR:

Odds ratio

OVER:

Open Versus Endovascular Repair

PAD:

Peripheral artery disease

PET:

Positron emission tomography

PIVOTAL:

Positive Impact of Endovascular Options for treating Aneurysms Early

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computer tomography

UKSAT:

UK Small Aneurysm Trial

US:

Ultrasound

USPSTF:

US Preventative Services Task Force

References

  1. Sakalihasan N, Limet R, Defawe OD. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet. 2005;365(9470):1577–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tainter CR. Abdominal aorta. In: Soni N, Arntfield R, Pierre K, editors. Point-of-care ultrasound. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc; 2015. p. 167–73.e3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Legg JS, Legg LM. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiol Technol. 2016;88(2):145–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Netscher D, Fiore N, Rodgers B. Vascular injuries and disorders of the upper extremity. In: Guyuron B, Eriksson E, Persing J, Chung K, Disa J, Gosain A, et al., editors. Plastic surgery: indications and practice. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2009. p. 1299–322.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobrin PB, Mrkvicka R. Failure of elastin or collagen as possible critical connective tissue alterations underlying aneurysmal dilatation. Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;2(4):484–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moneta GL, Taylor LM Jr, Yeager RA, Edwards JM, Nicoloff AD, McConnell DB, et al. Surgical treatment of infected aortic aneurysm. Am J Surg. 1998;175(5):396–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstone J. Aneurysms of the aorta and iliac arteries. In: Moore W, editor. Vascular and endovascular surgery: a comprehensive review. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 651–75.e4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. van der Vliet JA, Boll AP. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet. 1997;349(9055):863–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans GH, Stansby G, Hamilton G. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15(2):456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Satta J, Laara E, Juvonen T. Intraluminal thrombus predicts rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(4):737–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiernicki I, Szumilowicz P, Kazimierczak A, Falkowski A, Rutkowski D, Gutowski P. The blood flow channel index as novel predictor of abdominal aortic aneurysm impending rupture based on the intraluminal thrombus angio-CT study. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(4):662–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vorp DA, Lee PC, Wang DH, Makaroun MS, Nemoto EM, Ogawa S, et al. Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(2):291–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koole D, Zandvoort HJ, Schoneveld A, Vink A, Vos JA, van den Hoogen LL, et al. Intraluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm thrombus is associated with disruption of wall integrity. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(1):77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takayama T, Yamanouchi D. Aneurysmal disease: the abdominal aorta. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(4):877–91, viii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takagi H, Takuya Umemoto for the ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group. Association of diabetes mellitus with presence, expansion, and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm: “Curiouser and curiouser!” cried ALICE. Semin Vasc Surg. 2016;29(1–2):18–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Rango P, Farchioni L, Fiorucci B, Lenti M. Diabetes and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47(3):243–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wong DR, Willett WC, Rimm EB. Smoking, hypertension, alcohol consumption, and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm in men. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(7):838–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(2):92–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takagi H, Umemoto T, ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group. A meta-analysis of the association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with abdominal aortic aneurysm presence. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;34:84–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takagi H, Umemoto T. Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary, coronary artery, or peripheral artery disease with abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Int Angiol. 2016;36(4):322–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tornwall ME, Virtamo J, Haukka JK, Albanes D, Huttunen JK. Life-style factors and risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of Finnish male smokers. Epidemiology. 2001;12(1):94–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Larsson E, Granath F, Swedenborg J, Hultgren R. A population-based case-control study of the familial risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(1):47–50; discussion 51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Norman PE, Powell JT. Site specificity of aneurysmal disease. Circulation. 2010;121(4):560–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Isselbacher EM. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 2005;111(6):816–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006;113(11):e463–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lederle FA, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA. 1999;281(1):77–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fink HA, Lederle FA, Roth CS, Bowles CA, Nelson DB, Haas MA. The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):833–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilson WR, Bower TC, Creager MA, Amin-Hanjani S, O’Gara PT, Lockhart PB, et al. Vascular graft infections, mycotic aneurysms, and endovascular infections: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(20):e412–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mix J, Pitta S, Schwartz J, Tuchek J, Dieter R, Freeman M. Abdominal aorta. In: Dieter R, Dieter RJ, Dieter RI, editors. Peripheral arterial disease. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2008. p. 569–92.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Davis PM, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ Jr, Toomey BJ, Stanson AW, Bower TC, et al. Aorto-caval and ilio-iliac arteriovenous fistulae. Am J Surg. 1998;176(2):115–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Salo JA, Verkkala KA, Ala-Kulju KV, Heikkinen LO, Luosto RV. Hematuria is an indication of rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm into the vena cava. J Vasc Surg. 1990;12(1):41–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kent KC. Clinical practice. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(22):2101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hong H, Yang Y, Liu B, Cai W. Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysm: the present and the future. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2010;8(6):808–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Beales L, Wolstenhulme S, Evans JA, West R, Scott DJ. Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta. Br J Surg. 2011;98(11):1517–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaakkola P, Hippelainen M, Farin P, Rytkonen H, Kainulainen S, Partanen K. Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12(2):230–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chiu KW, Ling L, Tripathi V, Ahmed M, Shrivastava V. Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47(4):367–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sprouse LR 2nd, Meier GH 3rd, Lesar CJ, Demasi RJ, Sood J, Parent FN, et al. Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: is there a difference? J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(3):466–71; discussion 471–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reed MJ, Cheung LT. Emergency department led emergency ultrasound may improve the time to diagnosis in patients presenting with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014;21(4):272–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chien DK, Chang WH, Yeh YH. Radiographic findings of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Circulation. 2010;122(18):1880–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dalrymple N, Oliphant M, Leyendecker J. Imaging evaluation of acute abdominal pain. In: Dalrymple N, editor. Problem solving in abdominal imaging. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Inc; 2009. p. 147–83.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thammaroj J, Vungtal S, Srinakarin J. Predictive CT features in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Med Assoc Thail. 2006;89(4):434–40.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lin MP, Chang SC, Wu RH, Chou CK, Tzeng WS. A comparison of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and digital subtraction angiography findings in the diagnosis of infected aortic aneurysm. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32(4):616–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Litmanovich DE, Yildirim A, Bankier AA. Insights into imaging of aortitis. Insights Imaging. 2012;3(6):545–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Malkawi AH, Taylor J, Holt PJ, Morgan R, et al. Validation of DynaCT in the morphological assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm for endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17(2):183–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shabana WM, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Hussain HK, Francis IR, Su LD, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a report of 29 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(3):736–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Choke E, Cockerill G, Wilson WR, Sayed S, Dawson J, Loftus I, et al. A review of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30(3):227–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kotze C, Menezes L, Endozo R, Groves A, Ell P, Yusuf S. Increased metabolic activity in abdominal aortic aneurysm detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(1):93–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Reeps C, Essler M, Pelisek J, Seidl S, Eckstein HH, Krause BJ. Increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in abdominal aortic aneurysms in positron emission/computed tomography is associated with inflammation, aortic wall instability, and acute symptoms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(2):417–23; discussion 424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lindholt JS, Norman P. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm reduces overall mortality in men. A meta-analysis of the mid- and long-term effects of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36(2):167–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Final Recommendation Statement: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. 2014; Available at: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-screening. Accessed 3 Dec 2016.

  51. LeFevre ML, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(4):281–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Bandyk D, et al. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(6):441–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Scott RA, Wilson NM, Ashton HA, Kay DN. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg. 1995;82(8):1066–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1437–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Ballard DJ, Jordan WD Jr, Blebea J, et al. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA. 2002;287(22):2968–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Powell JT, Brown LC, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Ruckley CV, et al. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br J Surg. 2007;94(6):702–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chaikof EL, Brewster DC, Dalman RL, Makaroun MS, Illig KA, Sicard GA, et al. SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: executive summary. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(4):880–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1445–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cao P, De Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, Cieri E, et al. Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(1):13–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Kent KC, Zarins CK. Positive Impact of Endovascular Options for treating Aneurysms Early (PIVOTAL) Investigators. Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5):1081–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hendy K, Gunnarson R, Golledge J. Growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms assessed by computerised tomography--a systematic literature review. Atherosclerosis. 2014;235(1):182–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Titus J, Butler B. Endoleak management. In: Dieter R, Dieter RJ, Dieter RI, editors. Endovascular interventions: a case based approach. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2014. p. 373–81.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, Becquemin JP, van Marrewijk C, Laheij RJ. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. European Collaborators on Stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32(4):739–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Manning BJ, O’Neill SM, Haider SN, Colgan MP, Madhavan P, Moore DJ. Duplex ultrasound in aneurysm surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair: a comparison with computed tomography aortography. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(1):60–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bredahl KK, Taudorf M, Lonn L, Vogt KC, Sillesen H, Eiberg JP. Contrast enhanced ultrasound can replace computed tomography angiography for surveillance after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52(6):729–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ashoke R, Brown LC, Rodway A, Choke E, Thompson MM, Greenhalgh RM, et al. Color duplex ultrasonography is insensitive for the detection of endoleak after aortic endografting: a systematic review. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12(3):297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Raman KG, Missig-Carroll N, Richardson T, Muluk SC, Makaroun MS. Color-flow duplex ultrasound scan versus computed tomographic scan in the surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(4):645–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Habets J, Zandvoort HJ, Reitsma JB, Bartels LW, Moll FL, Leiner T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(4):340–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Garg T, Baker LC, Mell MW. Postoperative surveillance and long-term outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(10):957–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hoornweg LL, Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink DT, Koelemay MJ, Legemate DA, Balm R. Meta analysis on mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35(5):558–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kent K. Clinical practice. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. NEJM. 2014;371:2101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kent KC, Zwolak RM, Egorova NN, Riles TS, Manganaro A, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3):539–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Tenforde AS, Cheng CP, Suh GY, Herfkens RJ, Dalman RL, Taylor CA. Quantifying in vivo hemodynamic response to exercise in patients with intermittent claudication and abdominal aortic aneurysms using cine phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(2):425–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Nakahashi TK, Hoshina K, Tsao PS, Sho E, Sho M, Karwowski JK, et al. Flow loading induces macrophage antioxidative gene expression in experimental aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(12):2017–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Myers J, McElrath M, Jaffe A, Smith K, Fonda H, Vu A, et al. A randomized trial of exercise training in abdominal aortic aneurysm disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(1):2–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Best PJ, Tajik AJ, Gibbons RJ, Pellikka PA. The safety of treadmill exercise stress testing in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(8):628–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Propanolol Aneurysm Trial Investigators. Propranolol for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(1):72–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT. Use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors is associated with increased growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(1):1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Takagi H, Matsui M, Umemoto T. A meta-analysis of clinical studies of statins for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(6):1675–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Bailey MA, Dunne JA, Griffin KJ, Coughlin PA, Scott DJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of statin therapy on abdominal aortic aneurysms (Br J Surg 2011; 98: 362-353). Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):744–5; author reply 745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Meijer CA, Stijnen T, Wasser MN, Hamming JF, van Bockel JH, Lindeman JH, et al. Doxycycline for stabilization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(12):815–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Thompson A, Cooper JA, Fabricius M, Humphries SE, Ashton HA, Hafez H. An analysis of drug modulation of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth through 25 years of surveillance. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(1):55–61.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sieunarine K, Lawrence-Brown MM, Goodman MA. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for infrarenal aortic surgery: early and late results. Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;5(1):71–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Annambhotla S, Kibbe M. Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: EVAR. In: Dieter RS, Dieter Jr RA, Dieter III RA, editors. Endovascular interventions: a case-based approach. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2014. p. 355–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  85. Aziz F. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. In: Dean S, Satiani B, Abraham W, editors. Color atlas of vascular diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, Cuypers PW, van Sambeek MR, Balm R, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1607–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SM, et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(23):2398–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Cuypers PW, et al. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(20):1881–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG, EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9437):843–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM, EVAR trial investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10058):2366–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Padberg FT Jr, Matsumura JS, Kohler TR, et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1535–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Matsumura JS, Padberg FT Jr, Kohler TR, et al. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1988–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet. 1998;352(9141):1649–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, Verzini F, Haulon S, Waltham M, et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(Suppl 1):S1–S58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Rooke TW, Hirsch AT, Misra S, Sidawy AN, Beckman JA, Findeiss L, et al. Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline Recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(14):1555–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Karthikesalingram A, Vidal-Diez A, Holt P, Loftus I, Schermerhorn M, Soden P, et al. Thresholds for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in England and the United States. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2051–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Haulon S, Amiot S, Magnan PE, Becquemin JP, Lermusiaux P, Koussa M, et al. An analysis of the French multicentre experience of fenestrated aortic endografts: medium-term outcomes. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Coscas R, Kobeiter H, Desgranges P, Becquemin JP. Technical aspects, current indications, and results of chimney grafts for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(6):1520–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Leon L, Ihnat D, Mills J. Native arterial infections. In: Hallett J, Mills J, Earnshaw J, Reekers J, editors. Comprehensive vascular and endovascular surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Leon LR Jr, Mills JLS. Diagnosis and management of aortic mycotic aneurysms. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;44(1):5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Kan CD, Lee HL, Yang YJ. Outcome after endovascular stent graft treatment for mycotic aortic aneurysm: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(5):906–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Hart T, Milner R. Surgical versus endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: evidence to guide the optimal approach for the individual patient. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016;18(12):76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Paravastu SC, Ghosh J, Murray D, Farquharson FG, Serracino-Inglott F, Walker MG. A systematic review of open versus endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(3):291–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Newman, J.D., Motiwala, A., Turin, A., Chen, A., Maharaj, V.R., Dieter, R.S. (2019). Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. In: Dieter, R., Dieter Jr., R., Dieter III, R. (eds) Diseases of the Aorta . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11322-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11322-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11321-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11322-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics