Skip to main content

Private Seeking of Private Monopoly in Early American Banking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Public Choice ((SIPC,volume 39))

Abstract

In early nineteenth-century America, banks were chartered through legislative acts of incorporation. Most bank charters established local monopolies so that charters created economic rents. The public choice approach holds that governmental creation of artificial rents invites rent seeking and welfare losses, and more so the larger the potential rents. This chapter provides estimates of rents and potential welfare losses for Pennsylvania. The results suggest that local monopoly rents amounted to approximately 1–1.5% of gross domestic product. Pennsylvania adopted a number of policies, including price ceilings and tax policies, which reduced welfare losses and redistributed some of the rents. The chapter concludes with reflections on the evolving political economy of chartering policy, and why Pennsylvania was slow to reform its practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pennsylvania’s experience was typical. Between 1821 and 1835 the New York assembly received 563 petitions for bank charters. Only 56 were successful (Bodenhorn and Cuberes 2018).

  2. 2.

    Bribery is not a cost of rent seeking; it is a transfer. Moreover, if a lobbyist pays for a legislative junket, the value the legislators place on the junket is subtracted from the costs of rent seeking. Bribes and junkets are not genuinely wasteful spending in that they increase someone else’s welfare (Tollison 2012). See Lambsdorff (2002) for a comparison of lobbying and bribery in rent-seeking model.

  3. 3.

    The promised payment of $135,000 in 1803 is equivalent to between $3 million and $5 million in 2017 dollars depending on the conversion factor, keeping in mind that any inflation adjustment across two centuries is problematic. See Williamson (2018) for the inflation calculator.

  4. 4.

    Hartz (1948) and Handlin and Handlin (1969) show that corporate status was not often granted to private, profit-seeking enterprises in the early nineteenth-century. Because corporate status conferred privileges—limited liability, perpetual succession, and so on—unavailable to other enterprises, corporations, even private corporations, received legislative sanction only when they promoted some public purpose, broadly defined. Thus, the organizations most likely to receive corporate charters were churches, schools, libraries, turnpikes, bridges, ferries, and banks. One responsibility of government was promotion of economic growth, and it was believed, at least in some quarters, that bank-supplied credit was as integral to economic development as education and transportation infrastructure; thus, legislative bank chartering. General incorporation laws were uncommon before mid-century (Hilt 2017).

  5. 5.

    In his study of early nineteenth-century lobbying in Pennsylvania, Bowers (1983, p. 455) writes that the 1814 omnibus banking act created 41 banks, “each with an interest in future legislation.” By the 1820s bank lobbyists were “regular travelers” to the capital.

  6. 6.

    An example of board dysfunction occurred at the Bank of Pennsylvania in 1829. The state wanted to place a $2.2 million bond issue with the Philadelphia banks to finance canal construction. The Philadelphia Bank refused to subscribe to any part of the issue and the board at the Bank of Pennsylvania split. State-appointed directors favored the bank’s taking a large portion, while investor-elected directors were opposed. The state-appointed directors charged the elected directors with malpractice and a legislative committee was appointed to investigate. In testimony taken before the committee it became evident that the “ordinary courtesies” vital to a functioning board had been abandoned. Ordinary business was delayed and contentious (Holdsworth 1928, pp. 143–144; Hartz 1948, pp. 98–99).

  7. 7.

    Quote in section title from McCarthy (1903, p. 370).

  8. 8.

    North et al (2009) also recognize this as a pivotal moment in history; it as an example of an economy transitioning from natural state to open access.

  9. 9.

    I thank Bill Dougan for this insight.

  10. 10.

    To this day, banks receiving a federal charter are labeled national associations (as in Citibank, NA) because the national banking acts passed during the Civil War were modeled on New York’s 1838 banking act.

  11. 11.

    In my reading of contemporary literature and modern histories, I can find scant evidence of the new social history’s contention that the Antimason-Democrat debates were driven by concerns over increasing inequality, which translated to Antimasonic calls for equality of outcome (Note 1989). Rank-and-file Antimasons were not, to use the historical term, levelers.

References

  • Albany Evening Journal (1837) 28 March

    Google Scholar 

  • Amel DF, Hannan TH (1999) Establishing banking market definitions through estimation of residual deposit supply equations. Journal of Banking & Finance 23(11):1667–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn B (2017) The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bankers Magazine (1855) New banks in Pennsylvania. Bankers’ Magazine and Statistical Register 5(2):154

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson L (1961) The concept of jacksonian democracy: New york as a test case

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H (1998) Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Eastern Economic Journal 24(1):7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H (2000) A History of Banking in Antebellum America: Financial Markets and Economic Development in an Era of Nation-Building. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H (2003) State Banking in Early America: A New Economic History. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H (2006) Bank chartering and political corruption in antebellum New York: Free banking as reform. In: Glaeser E, Goldin C (eds) Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 231–257

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H (2007) Usury ceilings and bank lending behavior: Evidence from nineteenth century New York. Explorations in Economic History 44(2):179–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H (2017) Opening access: Banks and politics in New York from the Revolution to the Civil War. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 23560

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H, Cuberes D (2018) Finance and urbanization in early nineteenth-century New York. Journal of Urban Economics 104(1):47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn H, Rockoff H (1992) Regional interest rates in antebellum america. In: Goldin C, Rockoff H (eds) Strategic Factors in Ameican Economic History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers DE (1983) From logrolling to corruption: The development of lobbying in Pennsylvania, 1815-1861. Journal of the Early Republic 3(4):439–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broz JL, Grossman RS (2004) Paying for privilege: The political economy of Bank of England charters, 1694–1844. Explorations in Economic History 41(1):48–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (1980) Rent seeking and profit seeking. In: Buchanan JM, Tollison RD, Tullock G (eds) Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, Texas A&M University Press, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter SB, Gartner SS, Haines MR, Olmstead AL, Sutch R, Wright G (2006) Historical Statistics of the United States: Millennial Edition, vol 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant M (1982) Antimonopoly tradition under the ninth and fourteenth amendments: Slaughter-house cases re-examined. Emory Law Review 31(3):785–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling K, Mueller DC (1978) The social costs of monopoly power. Economic Journal 88(352):727–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross WR (1965) The Burned-Over District: The Social and Intellectual History of Enthusiastic Religion in Western New York, 1800-1850. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz R, Saidenberg MR, Strahan PE (1996) Banks with something to lose: The disciplinary role of franchise value. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review (October):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond DW (1991) Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy 99(4):689–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougan WR (1991) The cost of rent seeking: Is GNP negative? Journal of Political Economy 99(3):660–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougan WR, Snyder JM (1993) Are rents fully dissipated? Public Choice 77(4):793–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins S, McKitrick E (1993) The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermaker JV, Filer JE (1986) Impact of the first and second Banks of the United States and the Suffolk System on New England bank money: 1791-1837. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 18(1):28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field AJ (1983) Land abundance, interest/profit rates, and nineteenth-century American and British technology. Journal of Economic History 43(2):405–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formisano RP (2008) For the People: American Populist Movements from the Revolution to the 1850s. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Formisano RP, Kutolowski KS (1977) Antimasonry and masonry: The genesis of protest, 1826-1827. American Quarterly 29(2):139–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton G (1985) Clearinghouses and the origin of central banking in the United States. Journal of Economic History 45(2):277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton G (1996) Reputation formation in early bank note markets. Journal of Political Economy 104(2):346–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouge WM (1883) A Short History of Banking in the United States. T W Ustick, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn LR (2001) From factions to parties: The emergence of the second party system. In: Klein MM (ed) The Empire State: A History of New York, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 369–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton A (1790) Report Relative to a Provision for the Support of Public Credit. Available at https://founders.archives.gov

    Google Scholar 

  • Handlin O, Handlin MF (1969) Commonwealth: A Study of the Role of Gvoernment in the American Economy: Massachusetts, 1774–1861. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger AC (1954) Monopoly and resource allocation. American Economic Review 44(2):77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz L (1948) Economic Policy and Democratic Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hefford CB, Round DK (1978) The welfare cost of monopoly in Australia. Southern Economic Journal 44(4):846–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilt E (2017) Corporation law and the shift toward open access in the antebellum United States. In: Lamoreaux NR, Wallis JJ (eds) Organizations, Civil Society, and the Roots of Development, University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdsworth JT (1928) Financing an Empire: History of Banking in Pennsylvania. Clarke Publishing Company, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt M (1978) The Political Crisis of the 1850s. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1938) The general welfare in relation to problems of taxation and of railwway and utility rates. Econometrica 6(3):242–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson A (1832) Veto Message of President Andrew Jackson on Returning the Bank Bill to the Senate with His Objecstions, July, 1832. National Republican Central Committee, Lowell

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaremski M (2011) Bank-specific default risk in the pricing of bank note discounts. Journal of Economic History 71(4):950–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley MC (1990) Deposit insurance, risk, and market power in banking. American Economic Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutolowski KS (1982) Freemasonry and community in the early republic. American Quarterly 34(5):543–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutolowski KS (1984) Antimasonry reexamined. Journal of American History 71(2):269–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff JG (2002) Corruption and rent seeking. Public Choice 113(1–2):97–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DR, Tollison RD (2011) The welfare costs of monopoly are larger than you think. Managerial and Decision Economics 32(2):85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis L (1882) A History of the Bank of North America. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez RA, Pagoulatos E (1994) Rent seeking and the welfare costs of trade barriers 79(1):149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Q, Wallis JJ (2017) From partisan banking to open access in early Massachusetts. In: Lamoreaux N, Wallis JJ (eds) Organizations, Civil Society, and the Roots of Development, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 109–146

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy C (1903) The Anti-Masonic Party: A Study of Political Antimasonry in the United States, 1827–1840. Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane J (1804) Observations on the Principles and Operation of Banking; with Strictures on the Opposition to the Bank of Philadelphia. No publisher listed, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller W (1940) A note on the history of business corporations in Pennsylvania, 1800-1860. Quarterly Journal of Economics 55(1):150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Hampshire Bank Commissioners (1864) Annual Report of the Bank Commissioners of the State of New Hampshire, Made to His Excellency the Governor. Amos Hadley, public printer, Concord

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR (2009) Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Note (1989) Incorporating the republic: The corporation in antebellum political culture. Harvard Law Review 102(8):1883–1903

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Auditor General (1804–1859) Report of the Auditor General on the Finances of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. state printer, Harrisburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention (1837) Proceedings and Debates of the Covention of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to Propose Amendments to the Constitution, vol 2. Packer, Barrett & Parks, Harrisburg, reported by John Agg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania General Assembly (1803–1860) Acts of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. various publishers, Harrisburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania House of Representatives (1803) Journal of the Fourteenth House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. George Helmbold Jr, state printer, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins EJ (1978) Foreign interest rates in American financial markets: A revised series of dollar-sterling exchange rates, 1835–1900. Journal of Economic History 38(2):392–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner RA (1975) The social costs of monopoly and regulation. Journal of Political Economy 83(4):807–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich F (1968) The Molding of American Banking: Men and Ideas. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp RO (1988) Parties and the public good: Political anitmasonry in New York reconsidered. Journal of the Early Republic 8(3):253–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders A, Wilson B (2001) An analysis of bank charter value and its risk-constraining incentives 19(2):185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz AJ (1947) The beginning of competitive banking in Philadelphia, 1782–1809. Journal of Political Economy 55(5):417–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A ([1776]1981) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Volume I. Liberty Classics, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla R (1985) Early American banking: The significance of the corporate form. Business and Economic History 14(1):105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla R, Wilson J, Wright RE (2018) Early US securities prices. Available at: http://eh.net/database/early-u-s-securities-prices/

  • Tollison RD (1982) Rent seeking: A survey. Kyklos 35(4):575–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollison RD (2012) The economic theory of rent seeking. Public Choice 152(1):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trefousse HL (1997) Thaddeus Stevens: Nineteenth-Century Egalitarian. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1967) The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal 5(3):224–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1986) Transitional gains and transfers. Cato Journal 6(1):143–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1993) Rent Seeking. No. 2 in The Shaftesbury Papers, Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dusen GG (1947) Thurlow Weed: Wizard of the Lobby. Little, Brown & Co, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan WP (1983) The Antimasonic Party in the United States, 1826–1843. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis JJ (2006) The concept of systematic corruption in American history. In: Glaeser E, Goldin C (eds) Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis JJ (2011) Institutions, organizations, impersonality, and interests: The dynamics of institutions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 79(1):48–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis JJ, Sylla R, Legler JB (1994) The interaction of taxation and regulation in nineteenth-century US banking. In: Goldin C, Libecap GD (eds) The Regulated Economy: A Historical Approach to Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 121–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber W (2015) Antebellum bank balance sheets, https://www.webereconomics.com/data-archive

  • Weiss T (1992) US labor force estimates and economic growth, 1800–1860. In: Gallman RE, Wallis JJ (eds) American Economic Growth and Standards of Living before the Civil War, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 19–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson S (2018) Measuring worth, https://www.measuringworth.com/

  • Wilson J (1785) Considerations on the bank of north america. In: Wilson B (ed) The Works of the Honourable James Wilson, L. L. D, vol 3, Lorenzo Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Bill Dougan, Rob Fleck, Mike Makowsky, Sergey Mityakov and the other participants in the Public Economics workshop at Clemson University for comments on an earlier draft. I am deeply indebted to the late Bob Tollison for his generosity, collegiality, and for animating a culture of intellectual curiosity at Clemson. I thank Pam Bodenhorn for valuable research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Bodenhorn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 10.7.

Table 10.7 Bonus payments paid by banks in return for charter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bodenhorn, H. (2019). Private Seeking of Private Monopoly in Early American Banking. In: Hall, J., Witcher, M. (eds) Public Choice Analyses of American Economic History. Studies in Public Choice, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11313-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics