Abstract
This chapter In this servant leadership model, another theory from the domain of positive psychology, self-determination theory (SDT; Deci and Ryan in Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, Plenum, New York, NY, 1985) is used to explain the importance and application of need satisfaction as it pertains to well-being and motivation (Mayer, Servant leadership: Recent developments in theory and research, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, pp. 147–154, 2010). Well-being, in this context, refers to eudaimonic rather than hedonic well-being, although researchers have maintained that hedonic well-being can be experienced as an outcome of eudaimonic well-being. For example, Ryan and Deci (Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness, Guilford Publishing, New York, 2017) advanced that an outcome of eudaimonic well-being or flourishing is to feel positive, satisfied, and happy. Like most aspects of Seligman’s (Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being, Free Press, New York, NY, 2011) well-being theory, SDT is also focused on the idea that eudaimonic well-being is found in the process of becoming our best self, fully functioning, or flourishing. A brief overview of SDT will be provided and will be followed by a much closer look at the components of the theory and how it relates to servant leadership.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016). Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction. Leadership Quarterly,27(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2014). The history of self-determination theory in psychology and management. In M. Gagné (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 1–9). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Gagné, M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2013). Self-determination theory’s contribution to positive organizational psychology. In A. B. Bakker (Ed.), Advances in positive organizational psychology (pp. 61–82). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2046-410x(2013)0000001006.
Mayer, D. M. (2010). Servant leadership and basic psychological needs: Where do we go from here? In D. van Dierendonck & K. Patterson (Eds.), Servant leadership: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 147–154). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publishing.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sullivan, G.S. (2019). Servant Leadership and Need Satisfaction. In: Servant Leadership in Sport. Palgrave Studies in Workplace Spirituality and Fulfillment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11248-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11248-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11247-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11248-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)