Advertisement

Telecoupling pp 357-381 | Cite as

Co-producing Knowledge for Sustainable Development in Telecoupled Land Systems

  • Julie G. ZaehringerEmail author
  • Flurina Schneider
  • Andreas Heinimann
  • Peter Messerli
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management book series (PSNRM)

Abstract

Land is at the core of our planet’s sustainable development challenges. Different actors have contesting claims on ecosystem services provided by local land systems. Land-use changes therefore always entail trade-offs in terms of ecosystem service provision. The United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development offers a normative frame for land system science to produce relevant knowledge for transformation. Such knowledge should include an understanding of social-ecological systems from a systemic as well as a power perspective. Telecoupled interactions between distant systems present an additional challenge to knowledge production requiring methodological innovation. To co-produce evidence for navigating trade-offs inherent to land-use changes, we need to embrace the three knowledge dimensions of systems, target, and transformation knowledge and make use of inter- and transdisciplinary research approaches.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted as part of the Swiss Programme for Research on Global Issues for Development within the project “Managing telecoupled landscapes for the sustainable provision of ecosystem services and poverty alleviation”. It was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (grant number 400440 152167). Elements of this work were undertaken by the first author whilst as a visiting scholar in the Department of Geography, University of Cambridge (May 2018–April 2019). We are grateful to the entire project team for inspiring discussions and to the three reviewers and the editor for their constructive comments and support. We thank Marlène Thibault for copyediting our manuscript.

References

  1. Baird, Ian G., and Jefferson Fox. 2015. How Land Concessions Affect Places Elsewhere: Telecoupling, Political Ecology, and Large-Scale Plantations in Southern Laos and Northeastern Cambodia. Land 4 (2): 436–453.  https://doi.org/10.3390/land4020436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berbés-Blázquez, Marta, José A. González, and Unai Pascual. 2016. Towards an Ecosystem Services Approach That Addresses Social Power Relations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 19: 134–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boillat, Sébastien, Jean-David Gerber, Christoph Oberlack, Julie G. Zaehringer, Chinwe Ifejika Speranza, and Stephan Rist. 2018. Distant Interactions, Power, and Environmental Justice in Protected Area Governance: A Telecoupling Perspective. Sustainability 10 (11): 3954.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand, Jürg, and Jean-Laurent Pfund. 1998. Site-and Watershed-Level Assessment of Nutrient Dynamics under Shifting Cultivation in Eastern Madagascar. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 71 (1–3): 169–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00139-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costanza, Robert, Ralph d’Arge, Rudolf de Groot, Stephen Farber, Monica Grasso, Bruce Hannon, Karin Limburg, Shahid Naeem, Robert V. O’Neill, Jose Paruelo, Robert G. Raskin, Paul Sutton, and Marjan van den Belt. 1997. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature 387 (6630): 253–260.  https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daily, Gretchen C. 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eakin, Hallie, Ruth DeFries, Suzi Kerr, Eric F. Lambin, Jianguo Liu, Peter J. Marcotullio, Peter Messerli, Anette Reenberg, Ximena Rueda, Simon R. Swaffled, Birka Wicke, and Karl Zimmerer. 2014. Significance of Telecoupling for Exploration of Land-Use Change. In Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era, ed. Karen Seto and Anette Reenberg, 141–161. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eakin, Hallie, Ximena Rueda, and Ashwina Mahanti. 2017. Transforming Governance in Telecoupled Food Systems. Ecology and Society 22 (4): 32.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09831-220432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fazey, Ioan, Peter Moug, Simon Allen, Kate Beckmann, David Blackwood, Mike Bonaventura, Kathryn Burnett, et al. 2018. Transformation in a Changing Climate: A Research Agenda. Climate and Development 10 (3): 197–217.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1301864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferreyra, Cecilia, Rob C. de Loë, and Reid D. Kreutzwiser. 2008. Imagined Communities, Contested Watersheds: Challenges to Integrated Water Resources Management in Agricultural Areas. Journal of Rural Studies 24 (3): 304–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, Lisa-Britt, and Jens Newig. 2016. Importance of Actors and Agency in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Exploration of the Literature. Sustainability 8 (5): 476.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476.
  12. Fisher, Brendan, R. Kerry Turner, and Paul Morling. 2009. Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Decision Making. Ecological Economics 68 (3): 643–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friis, Cecilie, and Jonas Ø. Nielsen. 2017. On the System. Boundary Choices, Implications, and Solutions in Telecoupling Land Use Change Research. Sustainability 9 (6): 974.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrett, Rachael D., Ximena Rueda, and Eric F. Lambin. 2013. Globalization’s Unexpected Impact on Soybean Production in South America: Linkages between Preferences for Non-Genetically Modified Crops, Eco-Certifications, and Land Use. Environmental Research Letters 8 (4): 044055.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasparri, Nestor Ignacio, Tobias Kuemmerle, Patrick Meyfroidt, Yann le Polain de Waroux, and Holger Kreft. 2016. The Emerging Soybean Production Frontier in Southern Africa: Conservation Challenges and the Role of South-South Telecouplings. Conservation Letters 9 (1): 21–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Global Land Programme. 2016. Science Plan and Implementation Strategy 2016–2021. Bern: Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, John, Bruce Amos, and Timothy Wynne Plumptre. 2003. Governance Principles for Protected Areas in the 21st Century. Ottawa: Institute on Governance, Governance Principles for Protected Areas.Google Scholar
  18. Grumbine, Edward R. 1994. What Is Ecosystem Management? Conservation Biology 8 (1): 27–38.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010027.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haines-Young, Roy, and Marion Potschin. 2010. The Links between Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being. In Ecosystem Ecology. A New Synthesis, ed. David G. Raffaelli and Christopher L.J. Frid, 110–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heathcote, Isobel W. 2009. Integrated Watershed Management: Principles and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  21. IAASTD. 2009. Agriculture at a Crossroads. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development. Global Report. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  22. Keller, Eva. 2015. Beyond the Lens of Conservation: Malagasy and Swiss Imaginations of One Another. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  23. Leisz, Stephen J., Eric Rounds, Ngo The An, Nguyen Thi Bich Yen, Tran Nguyen Bang, Souvanthone Douangphachanh, and Bounheuang Ninchaleune. 2016. Telecouplings in the East-West Economic Corridor within Borders and Across. Remote Sensing 8 (12): 1012.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8121012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lenschow, Andrea, Jens Newig, and Edward Challies. 2016. Globalization’s Limits to the Environmental State? Integrating Telecoupling into Global Environmental Governance. Environmental Politics 25 (1): 136–159.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1074384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu, Jianguo, Yue Dou, Mateus Batistella, Edward Challies, Thomas Connor, Cecilie Friis, James D.A. Millington, et al. 2018. Spillover Systems in a Telecoupled Anthropocene: Typology, Methods, and Governance for Global Sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, System Dynamics and Sustainability 33: 58–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Messerli, Peter, Adrienne Gret-Regamey, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Khamla Phanvilay, San Win Myint, Karin Ingold, and Gudrun Schwilch. 2014. Managing Telecoupled Landscapes for the Sustainable Provision of Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation. A Proposal for an R4D Project Submitted to the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).Google Scholar
  27. Myers, Norman, Russell A. Mittermeier, Cristina G. Mittermeier, Gustavo A.B. da Fonseca, and Jennifer Kent. 2000. Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature 403 (6772): 853–858.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nilsson, Måns, Dave Griggs, and Martin Visbeck. 2016. Policy: Map the Interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature News 534 (7607): 320.  https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Proclim and CASS. 1997. Research on Sustainability and Global Change—Visions in Science Policy by Swiss Researchers. Bern: ProClim—Forum for Climate and Global Change, and Swiss Academy of Sciences SAS.Google Scholar
  30. Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara, Garry D. Peterson, and Elena M. Bennett. 2010a. Ecosystem Service Bundles for Analyzing Tradeoffs in Diverse Landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (11): 5242–5247.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raudsepp-Hearne, Ciara, Garry D. Peterson, Maria Tengö, Elena M. Bennett, Tim Holland, Karina Benessaiah, Graham K. MacDonald, and Laura Pfeifer. 2010b. Untangling the Environmentalist’s Paradox: Why Is Human Well-Being Increasing as Ecosystem Services Degrade? BioScience 60 (8): 576–589.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raworth, Kate. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Reenberg, Anette. 2009. Land System Science: Handling Complex Series of Natural and Socio-Economic Processes. Journal of Land Use Science 4 (12): 14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17474230802645618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ribot, Jesse C., and Nancy Lee Peluso. 2003. A Theory of Access. Rural Sociology 68 (2): 153–181.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sachs, Jeffrey. 2017. Land and the SDGs—Land Portal—Securing Land Rights Through Open Data. https://landportal.org/blog-post/2017/09/land-and-sdgs.
  36. Schneider, Flurina, Andreas Kläy, Anne Zimmermann, Thomas Buser, Micah L. Ingalls, and Peter Messerli. under review. How Can Science Support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development? Four Tasks to Deal with the Normative Dimension of Sustainability. Sustainability Science.Google Scholar
  37. Schneider, Flurina, and Stephan Rist. 2014. Envisioning Sustainable Water Futures in a Transdisciplinary Learning Process: Combining Normative, Explorative, and Participatory Scenario Approaches. Sustainability Science 9 (4): 463–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0232-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seto, Karen C., and Anette Reenberg. 2014. Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era. In Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era, Strüngmann Forum Reports, ed. Karen C. Seto and Anette Reenberg. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silva, Ramon Felipe Bicudo da, Mateus Batistella, Yue Dou, Emilio Moran, Sara McMillan Torres, and Jianguo Liu. 2017. The Sino-Brazilian Telecoupled Soybean System and Cascading Effects for the Exporting Country. Land 6 (3): 53.  https://doi.org/10.3390/land6030053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Torres, Sara M., Emilio F. Moran, and Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva. 2017. Property Rights and the Soybean Revolution: Shaping How China and Brazil Are Telecoupled. Sustainability 9 (6): 954.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner, Billie L., II, Eric F. Lambin, and Anette Reenberg. 2007. The Emergence of Land Change Science for Global Environmental Change and Sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (52): 20666–20671.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704119104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  43. Verburg, Peter H., Karl-Heinz Erb, Ole Mertz, and Giovana Espindola. 2013. Land System Science: Between Global Challenges and Local Realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Human Settlements and Industrial Systems 5 (5): 433–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wiesmann, Urs, Cordula Ott, Ch. Ifejika Speranza, U. Müller-Boeker, Peter Messerli, and Jakob Zinsstag. 2011. A Human Actor Model as a Conceptual Orientation in Interdisciplinary Research for Sustainable Development. In Research for Sustainable Development: Foundations, Experiences, and Perspectives, Perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern, ed. Urs Wiesmann and Hans Hurni, 231–256. Bern: Geographica Bernensia.Google Scholar
  45. Zaehringer, Julie G., Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Peter Messerli, and Anu Lannen. 2018. Conservation Versus Local Livelihoods? Sustainable Development Challenges in Madagascar. CDE Policy Brief 12. Bern: Centre for Development and Environment (CDE).Google Scholar
  46. Zaehringer, Julie G., Gudrun Schwilch, Onintsoa R. Andriamihaja, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, and Peter Messerli. 2017. Remote Sensing Combined with Social-Ecological Data: The Importance of Diverse Land Uses for Ecosystem Service Provision in North-Eastern Madagascar. Ecosystem Services 25: 140–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhu, Annah. 2017. Rosewood Occidentalism and Orientalism in Madagascar. Geoforum 86 (Suppl. C): 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. ———. 2018. Hot Money, Cold Beer: Navigating the Vanilla and Rosewood Export Economies in Northeastern Madagascar. American Ethnologist 45 (2): 253–267.  https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zimmerer, Karl, Eric Lambin, and Steven Vanek. 2018. Smallholder Telecoupling and Potential Sustainability. Ecology and Society 23 (1): 30.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09935-230130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie G. Zaehringer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Flurina Schneider
    • 1
  • Andreas Heinimann
    • 1
  • Peter Messerli
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations