Advertisement

Methodology

  • Lixun Wang
  • Andy Kirkpatrick
Chapter
Part of the Multilingual Education book series (MULT, volume 33)

Abstract

This chapter outlines the methodology adopted in this study. It describes the pilot study which was conducted and then goes on to describe the ways in which the schools and key stakeholders of the major part of the study were surveyed and how three cases studies in specific schools were undertaken.

Keywords

Qualitative research Quantitative research Ethnographic research Stakeholders Surveys Focus group interviews Case studies Survey instruments 

References

  1. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 18–40). London: Kogan.Google Scholar
  2. British Council. (2007). The new independent school sector in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The British Council. Retrieved from http://www.educationuk.org.hk/partnership/website/bc_-_indpt_school_report_final_formatted-final.pdf
  3. Chan, D., & Tan, J. (2008). Privatization and the rise of direct subsidy scheme schools and independent schools in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 464–487.Google Scholar
  4. Christensen, P. (2011). Ethnographic Eencounter with Cchildren. In D. Hartas (Ed.), Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 185–200). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Education Commission. (1988). Education commission report number three. Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, M. (1968). Emics, etics, and the new ethnography. In M. Harris (Ed.), The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture. Altamira: Lanham.Google Scholar
  10. Information Services Department. (2016). Hong Kong: The facts (Education). Retrieved from http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/education.pdf
  11. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schensul, J. J., Stephen, L., Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (Eds.). (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  13. Wang, L., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2013). Trilingual education in Hong Kong primary schools: A case study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(1), 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Whitehead, T. L. (2005). Basic classical ethnographic research methods. Cultural Ecology of Health and Change, 1, 1–29.Google Scholar
  15. Wolcott, H. F. (2005). The art of fieldwork. Walnut Creek: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
  16. Yung, A. M. S. (2006). The policy of direct subsidy schools in Hong Kong: Finance and administration. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 5, 94–111. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lixun Wang
    • 1
  • Andy Kirkpatrick
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Linguistics and Modern Language StudiesThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of Languages & LinguisticsGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations