How Might Voice Assistants Raise Our Children?

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)


When mobile devices such as tablets and smartphones were becoming more popular, an important question that psychologists and pediatricians asked was how interactions facilitated by these devices with screens may affect the functioning of children. Nowadays, when technology used by children, such as intelligent voice assistants, does not require a screen at all, these issues seem to fall into the background. Today, concerns are growing about the effect of interacting with voice-driven AI services, as it may potentially have a greater impact on children’s cognitive development than engaging with television or smartphones. The purpose of this paper is to outline potentially interesting directions of research in the field of voice assistant technology concerning how this solution may affect the functioning of children, and in particular if, and to what extent, it may redefine the dynamics of social contacts within and outside the family.


Intelligent voice assistants Human factors Digital parenting 


  1. 1.
    Dataset from research conducted by Engineering UK: For Tomorrow’s Engineers 2017 (2018).
  2. 2.
    Don’t let Mattel’s new “digital nanny” trade children’s privacy for profit.
  3. 3.
    Critcher, C.: Making waves: historical aspects of public debates about children and mass media. In: The International Handbook of Children, Media and Culture, pp. 91–104 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gabriel, N.: The Sociology of Early Childhood: Critical Perspectives (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nass, C., Brave, S.: Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. MIT Press, MA (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schroeder, J., Epley, N.: Mistaking minds and machines: how speech affects dehumanization and anthropomorphism. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 1427–1437 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piotrowski, J.T., Valkenburg, P.M.: Finding orchids in a field of dandelions: understanding children’s differential susceptibility to media effects. Am. Behav. Sci. 59, 1776–1789 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J., Walther, J.B.: Media effects: theory and research. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 67, 315–338 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mattel Pulls Aristotle Children’s Device After Privacy Concerns.
  10. 10.
    Wiederhold, B.K.: “Alexa, are you my mom?” The role of artificial intelligence in child development. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 21, 471–472 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    On the Heels of Congressional Inquiry, Advocates Ask Mattel to Scrap “Aristotle,” AI Device Which Spies on Babies & Kids.
  12. 12.
    Bonfert, M., Spliethöver, M., Arzaroli, R., Lange, M., Hanci, M., Porzel, R.: If you ask nicely: a digital assistant rebuking impolite voice commands. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 95–102. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Druga, S., Williams, R., Breazeal, C., Resnick, M.: “Hey Google is it OK if I eat you?” In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children – IDC 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reid Chassiakos, Y. (linda), Chassiakos, Y. (linda) R., Radesky, J., Christakis, D., Moreno, M.A., Cross, C.: Council on communications and media: children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics. 138, e20162593 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    De La Bastide, D.: Research Says Kids Will Be BFFs With Robots In the Future.
  16. 16.
    Yarosh, S., et al.: Children asking questions. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children – IDC 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newman, J.: To Siri with Love: A Mother, Her Autistic Son, and the Kindness of Machines. HarperCollins (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Porcheron, M., Fischer, J.E., Reeves, S., Sharples, S.: Voice interfaces in everyday life. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flessert, M., Beran, M.J.: Delayed gratification. In: Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior, pp. 1–7 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skorupska, K., Nunez, M., Kopec, W., Nielek, R.: Older adults and crowdsourcing: Android TV App for Evaluating TEDx Subtitle Quality. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CSCW 2018), vol. 2 (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kopec, W., Skibiński, M., Biele, C., Skorupska, K., Jaskulska, A., Marasek, K.: Hybrid approach to automation, RPA and machine learning: a method for the human-centered design of software robots. In: Workshop on Industrial Internet of Things at CSCW 2018, NY, USA (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greene, J.D.: Solving the trolley problem. In: A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, pp. 173–189 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Information Processing InstituteWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Polish-Japanese Academy of Information TechnologyWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Kobo Association CAMWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations