Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership in Nursing: Experiences from the European Nordic Countries

  • 936 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes an exemplary research project examining patient care and patient outcomes at local and national level. The research project is a complex intervention based on shared decision-making for patients facing a choice of dialysis modality. A transitional research model has directed this project, why in this chapter particular attention is devoted to (1) how to ensure evidence-based practice and integrate clinical practice and research, (2) how to illustrate the need for nursing in clinical practice and (3) how to combine a translational research approach with a research programme in a specific project. The chapter concludes that the success of a research project hinges on the translational research approach and the level of clinical expertise characterizing the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rycroft-Malone J. What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? J Adv Nurs. 2004;47:81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almutary H, Douglas C, Bonner A. Towards a symptom cluster model in chronic kidney disease: a structural equation approach. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(10):2450–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Dialyse ved kronisk nyresvigt - kan antallet af patienter i udgående dialyse øges?: En Medicinsk Teknologi Vurdering. Version 1,0; versionsdato: 20. november 2006 ed. København; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richards DA, Hallberg IR, editors. Complex interventions in health. An overview of research methods. New York: Routledge; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffmann TC, Erueti C, Glasziou PP. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f3755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. King K. Patients’ perspectives of factors affecting modality selection: a national kidney foundation patient survey. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2000;7(3):261–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehrotra R, Marsh D, Vonesh E, Peters V, Nissenson A. Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2005;68(1):378–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stack AG, Martin DR. Association of patient autonomy with increased transplantation and survival among new dialysis patients in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45(4):730–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bleijenberg N, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Trappenburg JCA, Ettema RGA, Sino CG, Heim N, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste by optimizing the development of complex interventions: enriching the development phase of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erlang AS, Nielsen IH, Hansen HO, Finderup J. Patients experiences of involvement in choice of dialysis mode. J Ren Care. 2015;41:260–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Finderup J, Jensen JKD, Lomborg K. Developing and pilot testing a shared decision-making intervention for dialysis choice. J Ren Care. 2018;44(3):152–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Légaré F, Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD006732.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. Br Med J. 2006;333(7565):417–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coulter A, Stilwell D, Kryworuchko J, Mullen PD, Ng CJ, Van Der Weijden T. A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Med Informatics Decis Mak. 2013;13(Suppl. 2):S2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D. An evidence-based approach to managing women’s decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31(5):570–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Finderup J, Baker H. Ottawa personal decision guide, Danish version (OPDG-Danish). 2016. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/das/OPDG-Danish.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2018.

  20. Clabby J, O’Connor R. Teaching learners to use mirroring: rapport lessons from neurolinguistic programming. Fam Med. 2004;36(8):541–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gordon TKB. Parent education: problems, conflicts, solutions. Copenhagen: Borgen; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Steinberg JM. Aktivt verdivalg. Meninger og handlinger. En pedagogisk metodikk. 3rd ed. Aventura; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kriston L, Scholl I, Hoelzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Haerter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80:94–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prichard A, Thomas N. The option grid: a shared decision-making tool for renal patients. J Ren Nurs. 2013;5:6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Danske patienter. ViBIS. https://danskepatienter.dk/vibis. Accessed 22 Sept 2018.

  26. Johansson MJ, Pedersen CG, Lomborg K. Det Brugerinddragende Hospital - Evalueringsrapport. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stacey D, Taljaard M, Drake ER, O’Connor AM. Audit and feedback using the brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT-10) to evaluate nurse-standardized patient encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;75:519–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung W, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8(1):34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair FS, May CM, et al. Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

    Jeanette Finderup

  2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Kirsten Lomborg

Authors
  1. Jeanette Finderup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kirsten Lomborg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanette Finderup .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland

    Thóra B. Hafsteinsdóttir

  2. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland

    Helga Jónsdóttir

  3. Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Olso, Norway

    Marit Kirkevold

  4. Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    Helena Leino-Kilpi

  5. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Kirsten Lomborg

  6. Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Ingalill Rahm Hallberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Finderup, J., Lomborg, K. (2019). Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. In: Hafsteinsdóttir, T., Jónsdóttir, H., Kirkevold, M., Leino-Kilpi, H., Lomborg, K., Rahm Hallberg, I. (eds) Leadership in Nursing: Experiences from the European Nordic Countries. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10964-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10964-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10963-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10964-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation