Biorefinery pp 461-477 | Cite as

Exploring the Selective Lactic Acid Production from Food Waste in Uncontrolled pH Mixed Culture Fermentations Using Different Reactor Configurations

  • Fabian Bonk
  • Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-OyanedelEmail author
  • Ahmed F. Yousef
  • Jens Ejbye Schmidt


Carboxylic acid production from food waste by mixed culture fermentation is an important future waste management option. Obstacles for its implementation are the need of pH control and a broad fermentation product spectrum leading to increased product separation costs. To overcome these obstacles, the selective production of lactic acid (LA) from model food waste by uncontrolled pH fermentation was tested using different reactor configurations. Batch experiments, semi-continuously fed reactors and a percolation system reached LA concentrations of 32, 16, and 15 gCODLA/L, respectively, with selectivities of 93%, 84%, and 75% on COD base, respectively. The semi-continuous reactor was dominated by Lactobacillales. Our techno-economic analysis suggests that LA production from food waste can be economically feasible, with LA recovery and low yields remaining as major obstacles. To solve both problems, we successfully applied in situ product extraction using activated carbon.


Lactic acid Mixed culture fermentation Food waste Percolation system Microbial community Biorefinery 



The author would like to acknowledge the financial support from Masdar Institute (Project 2BIONRG, 12KAMA4, and BIOREF, 13KAMA1), to help fulfill the vision of the late President Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan for sustainable development and empowerment of the United Arab Emirates and humankind.


  1. Abdel-Rahman MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K (2013) Recent advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes. Biotechnol Adv 31:877–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aceves-Lara CA, Trably E, Bastidas-Oyanedel JR, Ramirez I, Latrille E, Steyer JP (2008) Bioenergy production from waste: examples of biomethane and biohydrogen. J Soc Biol 202:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos JL, Guwy AJ, Kalyuzhnyi S, Jenicek P, van Lier JB (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59:927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastidas-Oyanedel JR, Mohd-Zaki Z, Pratt S, Steyer JP, Batstones DJ (2010) Development of membrane inlet mass spectrometry for examination of fermentation processes. Talanta 83:482–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bastidas-Oyanedel JR, Bonk F, Thomsen MH, Schmidt JE (2015) Dark fermentation biorefinery in the present and future (bio)chemical industry. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 14:473–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bastidas-Oyanedel JR, Fang C, Almardeai S, Javid U, Yousuf A, Schmidt JE (2016) Waste biorefinery in arid/semi-arid regions. Bioresour Technol 215:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonk F, Bastidas-Oyanedel J, Schmidt J (2015) Converting the organic fraction of solid waste from the city of Abu Dhabi to valuable products via dark fermentation – economic and energy assessment. Waste Manag 40:82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castillo Martinez FA, Balciunas EM, Salgado JM, Domínguez González JM, Converti A, Oliveira RPDS (2013) Lactic acid properties, applications and production: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 30:70–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diltz RA, Marolla TV, Henley MV, Li L (2007) Reverse osmosis processing of organic model compounds and fermentation broths. Bioresour Technol 98:686–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao C, Ma C, Xu P (2011) Biotechnological routes based on lactic acid production from biomass. Biotechnol Adv 29:930–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grootscholten TIM, Kinsky dal Borgo F, Hamelers HVM, Buisman CJN (2013) Promoting chain elongation in mixed culture acidification reactors by addition of ethanol. Biomass Bioenergy 48:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoelzle RD, Virdis B, Batstone DJ (2014) Regulation mechanisms in mixed and pure culture microbial fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:2139–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ju F, Zhang T (2015) Experimental design and bioinformatics analysis for the application of metagenomics in environmental sciences and biotechnology. Environ Sci Technol 49(21):12628–12640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim DH, Lim WT, Lee MK, Kim MS (2012) Effect of temperature on continuous fermentative lactic acid (LA) production and bacterial community, and development of LA-producing UASB reactor. Bioresour Technol 119:335–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Walters WA, Gonzalez A, Caporaso JG, Knight R (2012) Using QIIME to analyze 16 rRNA gene sequences from microbial communities. Curr Protoc Microbiol 27(1):1E.5.1-1E.5.20Google Scholar
  16. Liang S, Gliniewicz K, Gerritsen AT, McDonald AG (2016) Analysis of microbial community variation during the mixed culture fermentation of agricultural peel wastes to produce lactic acid. Bioresour Technol 208:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. López-Garzón CS, Straathof AJJ (2014) Recovery of carboxylic acids produced by fermentation. Biotechnol Adv 32:873–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodríguez J, Lema JM, van Loosdrecht MCM, Kleerebezem R (2006) Variable stoichiometry with thermodynamic control in ADM1. Water Sci Technol 54:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tabatabaei M, Zakaria MR, Rahim RA, Abdullah N, Wright ADG, Shirai Y, Shamsara M, Sakai K, Hassan MA (2010) Comparative study of methods for extraction and purification of environmental DNA from high-strength wastewater sludge. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(31):4926–4937Google Scholar
  20. Taian Health Chemical Co. Ltd (2016) Factory price tech grade 50-21-5 l-lactic acid price [WWW Document]. Accessed 19 June 2016
  21. Thang VH, Novalin S (2008) Green biorefinery: separation of lactic acid from grass silage juice by chromatography using neutral polymeric resin. Bioresour Technol 99:4368–4379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang X, Wang Y, Zhang X, Feng H, Xu T (2013) In-situ combination of fermentation and electrodialysis with bipolar membranes for the production of lactic acid: continuous operation. Bioresour Technol 147:442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu Y, Ma H, Zheng M, Wang K (2015) Lactic acid production from acidogenic fermentation of fruit and vegetable wastes. Bioresour Technol 191:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu Q-L, Guo W-Q, Zheng H-S, Luo H-C, Feng X-C, Yin R-L, Ren N-Q (2016) Enhancement of volatile fatty acid production by co-fermentation of food waste and excess sludge without pH control: the mechanism and microbial community analyses. Bioresour Technol 216:653–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yousuf A, Bonk F, Bastidas-Oyanedel J-R, Schmidt JE (2016) Recovery of carboxylic acids produced during dark fermentation of food waste by adsorption on Amberlite IRA-67 and activated carbon. Bioresour Technol 217:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zanella O, Tessaro IC, Feris LA (2014) Desorption- and decomposition-based techniques for the regeneration of activated carbon. Chem Eng Technol 37:1447–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang B, He P-J, Ye N-F, Shao L-M (2008) Enhanced isomer purity of lactic acid from the non-sterile fermentation of kitchen wastes. Bioresour Technol 99:855–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang F, Zhang Y, Ding J, Dai K, van Loosdrecht MCM, Zeng RJ (2014) Stable acetate production in extreme-thermophilic (70°C) mixed culture fermentation by selective enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Sci Rep 4:5268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabian Bonk
    • 1
    • 2
  • Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ahmed F. Yousef
    • 3
  • Jens Ejbye Schmidt
    • 4
  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartmentKhalifa University of Science and Technology, Masdar InstituteAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Department of Environmental MicrobiologyUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Chemistry DepartmentKhalifa University of Science and Technology, Masdar InstituteAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates
  4. 4.SDU-Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark

Personalised recommendations