Abstract
There exist many definitions and interpretations of the “welfare state”, and scholars have over the last 50 years or so offered a number of more or less competing conceptualizations and typologies or “models” of welfare states based on various criteria or specific combinations of criteria. One such type or model of welfare states to be distinguished among Western welfare states is the “Nordic welfare model”. Much has been written about the Nordic welfare states. This paper tries to pinpoint what the author claims can be considered the main characteristics of the welfare state of the Nordic type. Many aspects of the Nordic welfare states are shared with other welfare states. It is not one feature, but a specific combination of features, which can be said to define and justify a concept of a Nordic type of welfare state. The combination of features makes the similarities between the group of Nordic welfare states (i.e. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, while Iceland is slightly different) greater than similarities between any of the Nordic countries and other European or Western welfare states. As other European and Western countries, the Nordic countries are all democratic, capitalist market-oriented economies with a substantial—and varying—emphasis on social and welfare policies. Some kind of “welfare state” exists in all Western countries, and the scope of public welfare effort is, with very few exceptions, larger in European countries in general than elsewhere in the world. What can be said to put “the family of” Nordic countries apart from other Western countries is that their welfare states with “Nordic characteristics” combine the normative foundation of strong public responsibility for citizen welfare, the principle of universal population coverage, adherence to social equality, with specific formal and informal mechanisms through which social policies are developed and politically agreed upon. The paper briefly also comments on and emphasizes the role of long-term cooperation between the five independent Nordic countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The label can vary. Sometimes the Nordic experience of welfare state development is referred to as “the Scandinavian welfare model” or “the social-democratic welfare model”, or it is referred to as nation-specific models, e.g. “the Danish-”, “the Norwegian-” or “the Swedish model”. My first publication on “the Scandinavian model” was published (in Norwegian) in 1990 (Kuhnle, 1990).
- 2.
The Swedish Social Democratic Party has, much to the surprise of many Nordic scholars in the field, in fact in 2014 got “The Nordic Model” accepted as their trademark by the Swedish agency for patent and trademark registration (“Patent- och registreringsverket”). The Nordic Council of Ministers has, correctly in my opinion, protested such an attempt at political monopolization of the concept.
- 3.
This statement on most equal “in the world” is most likely justified although the OECD statistics only cover its 34 member countries.
References
Abrahamson, P. (2002). The welfare modelling business. Social Policy & Administration, 33(4), 394–415.
Alestalo, M., & Flora, P. (1994). Scandinavia: Welfare states in the periphery—Peripheral welfare states. In M. Alestalo, E. Allardt, A. Rychard, & W. Wesolowski (Eds.), The transformation of Europe. Social conditions and consequences (pp. 53–73). Warsaw: IFiS Publishers.
Alestalo, M., Hort, S. E. O., & Kuhnle, S. (2009). The Nordic model: Conditions, origins, outcomes and lessons. Hertie School of Governance, Working Papers No. 41.
Allardt, E. (1986). The civic conception of the welfare state. In R. Rose & R. Shiratori (Eds.), The welfare state east and west. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arts, W. A., & Gelissen, J. (2010). Models of the welfare state (Chapter 39). In F. G. Castles et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state. Oxford: OUP.
Borrås, S., & Jacobsson, K. (2004). The open method of co-ordination and new governance in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 85–202.
Castles, F., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H., & Pierson, C. (2010). Introduction (Chapter 1). In F. G. Castles et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state. Oxford: OUP.
Childs, M. (1936). Sweden: The middle way. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cox, R. (2004). The path-dependency of an idea: Why Scandinavian welfare states remain distinct. Social Policy and Administration, 38(2), 204–219.
Elder, N., Thomas, A., & Arter, D. (1988). The consensual democracies: The government and politics of the Scandinavian states. London: Blackwell.
Erikson, R., Hansen, E. J., Ringen, S., & Uusitalo, H. (Eds.). (1987). The Scandinavian model. Welfare states and welfare research. New York/London: M.E. Sharpe.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Flora, P. (1986). Growth to limits. The Western European welfare states since World War II. Vol 1: Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark; Vol. 2: Germany, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy; Vol. 4: Appendix (synopses, bibliographies, tables). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Flora, P., & Alber, J. (1981). Modernization, democratization, and the development of welfare states in Western Europe. In P. Flora & A. J. Heidenheimer (Eds.), The development of welfare states in Europe and America. New Brunswick/London: Transaction Books.
Fritzell, J., & Lundberg, O. (2005). Fighting inequalities in health and income: One important road to welfare and social development. In O. Kangas & J. Palme (Eds.), Social policy and economic development in the Nordic countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hilson, M. (2008). The Nordic model: Scandinavia since 1945. London: Reaktion Books.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Itacha, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kildal, N., & Kuhnle, S. (2005). The Nordic welfare model and the idea of universalism. In N. Kildal & S. Kuhnle (Eds.), Normative foundations of the welfare state: The Nordic experience. London: Routledge.
Korpi, W. (1978). The working class in welfare capitalism. Work, unions and politics in Sweden. London/Henley/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kuhnle, S. (1990). Den skandinaviske velferdsmodell: Skandinavisk? Velferd? Modell? In A. R. Hovdum, S. Kuhnle, & L. Stokke (Eds.), Visjoner om velferdssamfunnet. Bergen: Alma Mater.
Kuhnle, S., & Hort, S. E. O. (2004). The developmental welfare state in Scandinavia. Lessons for the developing world. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Social Policy and Development. Programme Paper Number 17.
Kuhnle, S., & Sander, A. (2010). The emergence of the Western welfare state (Chapter 5). In F. G. Castles et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state. Oxford: OUP.
Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173.
Lindbom, A., & Rothstein, B. (2004). The mysterious survival of the Swedish welfare state. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Chicago September 2–5th.
Leibfried, S. & Mau, S. (2008). Introduction. Welfare States: Construction, Deconstruction, Reconstruction. In S. Leibfried & S. Mau (Eds.), Welfare States: Construction, Deconstruction, Reconstruction. Vol. 1: Analytical Approaches. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: pp. xi-lxiv.
Marx, K. (1979). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Collected works (Vol. 2, pp. 99–197). Moscow: Progress Publishers. (Original work published 1852).
Nystrøm, P. (1989). Välfärdsstatens styrningsmekanismer. In Historia och biografi. Lund: Arkiv.
Petersen, K. (2006). Constructing Nordic welfare: Nordic social political cooperation 1919-1955. In N. F. Christiansen, K. Petersen, N. Edling, & P. Haave (Eds.), The Nordic model of welfare: A historical reappraisal (pp. 67–98). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Ringen, S. (1991). Do welfare state come in types. In P. Saunders & D. Encel (Eds.), Social policy in Australia: Options for the 1990s. University of New South Wales: Social Policy Research Centre, Reports and Proceedings, No. 96.
Ringen, S., & Uusitalo, H. (1992). Income distribution and redistribution in the Nordic welfare states. In J. E. Kolberg (Ed.), The study of welfare regimes. New York/London: M-E. Sharpe.
Rustow, D. (1955). The politics of compromise. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sainsbury, D. (1999). Gender and welfare state regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Economist. (2006). The world in 2007 (21st ed.). London: The Economist.
The Economist. (2013, February 2).
Titmuss, R. M. (1974). Social policy. London: Allen & Unwin.
Wilensky, H., & Lebeaux, C. N. (1958). Industrial society and social welfare. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuhnle, S. (2019). Welfare States with Nordic Characteristics. In: Jing, Tk., Kuhnle, S., Pan, Y., Chen, S. (eds) Aging Welfare and Social Policy. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10895-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10895-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10894-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10895-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)