Advertisement

The Role of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation

  • Levent Ertuğrul Inan
  • Nurten Inan
Chapter
Part of the Headache book series (HEAD)

Abstract

Conventional (Continuous) Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (CRF) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) are becoming treatment choices in severe headache cases. PRF differs from CRF as it maintains tissue temperature below 42 °C and prevents possible tissue destruction. We will focus on the PRF technique, mechanisms, and usage in cases of headache resistant to medical treatment. Its usage in trigeminal neuralgia is well known. We will therefore concentrate on the effectiveness of PRF of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) in a resistant cluster headache patient, PRF of the greater occipital nerve (GON) in a cervicogenic headache patient, and PRF of the lesser occipital nerve (LON) in LON neuralgia.

Nerve stimulation is necessary before making an RF lesion. Fluoroscopy, ultrasound, or CT-guided needle placement may be used. The place of the needle should be checked with nerve stimulation. The needle should be replaced under guidance if it is not at the correct localization as determined by the stimulation response.

The mechanism of the analgesic effect of PRF is not well known. These changes take days to develop after the application of PRF and are not related to the temperature.

Keywords

Interventional management Headache Radiofrequency 

References

  1. 1.
    Cosman ER Sr, Cosman ER Jr. Principles and descriptions of special techniques. In: Raj PP, Erdine S, editors. Pain relieving procedures. The illustrated guide. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 68–91.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cosman E, Cosman B. Methods of making nervous system lesion. In: Wilkens R, Rengachary SS, editors. Neurosurgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1984. p. 2490–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Zundert J, Sluijter M, Van Kleef M. Thermal and pulsed radiofrequency. In: Raj PP, Lou L, Erdine S, Staats PS, Waldman SD, Racz G, Hammer M, Niv D, Lopez RR, Heavner JE, editors. Interventional pain management image-guided procedures. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008. p. 56–65.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Zundert J, de Louw AJ, Joosten EA, Kessels AG, Honig W, Dederen PJ, et al. Pulsed and continuous radiofrequency current adjacent to the cervical dorsal root ganglion of the rat induces late cellular activity in the dorsal horn. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(1):125–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sluijter ME, Cosman ER, Rittman WB II, Van Kleef M. The effects of pulsed radiofrequency field applied to the dorsal root ganglion: a preliminary report. Pain Clinic. 1998;11:109–17.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramzy EA, Khalil KI, Nour EM, Hamed M, Taha MA. Evaluation of the effect of duration on the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Pain Physician. 2018;21(2):191–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elawamy A, Abdalla EEM, Shehata GA. Effects of pulsed versus conventional versus combined radiofrequency for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective study. Pain Physician. 2017;20(6):E873–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nader A, Bendok BR, Prine JJ, Kendall M. Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency application via the pterygopalatine fossa: a practical approach to treat refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Physician. 2015;18:E411–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ho KWD, Przkora R, Kumar S. Sphenopalatine ganglion: block, radiofrequency ablation and neurostimulation – a systematic review. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Narouze S, Kapural L, Casanova J, Mekhail N. Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache. Headache. 2009;49(4):571–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fang L, Jingjing L, Ying S, Lan M, Tao W, Nan J. Computerized tomography-guided sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment in 16 patients with refractory cluster headaches: twelve- to 30-month follow-up evaluations. Cephalalgia. 2016;36(2):106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oomen KP, van Wijck AJ, Hordijk GJ, de Ru JA. Effects of radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion on headache and facial pain: correlation with diagnosis. J Orofac Pain. 2012. Winter;26(1):59–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grandhi RK, Kaye AD, Abd-Elsayed A. Systematic review of radiofrequency ablation and pulsed radiofrequency for management of cervicogenic headaches. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018;22(3):18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niraj G, Critchley P, Kodivalasa M, Dorgham M. Greater occipital nerve treatment in the management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension headache: a case report. Headache. 2017;57(6):952–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen SP, Peterlin BL, Fulton L, Neely ET, Kurihara C, Gupta A, Mali J, Fu DC, Jacobs MB, Plunkett AR, Verdun AJ, Stojanovic MP, Hanling S, Constantinescu O, White RL, McLean BC, Pasquina PF, Zhao Z. Randomized, double-blind, comparative-effectiveness study comparing pulsed radiofrequency to steroid injections for occipital neuralgia or migraine with occipital nerve tenderness. Pain. 2015;156(12):2585–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Levent Ertuğrul Inan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nurten Inan
    • 3
  1. 1.Bozok University Medical School, Neurology DepartmentAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Ministry of Health Ankara Research and Training Hospital, Neurology and Algology DepartmentAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Gazi University Medical School, Anesthesiology and Algology DepartmentsAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations