Abstract
Eilidh dialogues with Pessoa about the question of the self as plural and relational. She questions the self as a singular entity through her generative play, her tireless masking, the way in which she goes in and out of costumes, roles and identities. Pessoa does so through his heteronyms, by moving in and out of characters—persons that he crafts—who have different names, features and lives and exist alongside each other. Why is it not enough for Eilidh to rest in her self? Why does she decide instead to try out different clothes, costumes, characters, roles occupying other spaces, selves and times? Heideggerian existentialism reads in curiosity traces of fallen-ness into the world. Far from home, the world is a place we long to belong to as we engage in a ceaseless self-search by means of our very being in it. Or is our very being-in-the-world a ceaseless search for the self? Psychoanalysis helps to think about this question relationally with its attention to the mother-infant relationship as that first self-other relationship that allows a sense of self by means of an other. Winnicott would add to that the thought of a sense of self emerging not only by being mirrored but also by not being found or else by being failed by the other. Thinking of Eilidh, what in her drew me readily in, I think of how the reciprocal use of each other (I looked to find Eilidh who kept on changing) was also an escape from each other, confirming also of the fluidity in being and in meaning as they escape being captured.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note following the writing of the observation.
- 2.
Extract from personal notes upon starting my observations.
- 3.
Extract from personal notes during fieldwork.
References
Bachelard, G. (1971). The poetics of reverie. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Butler, J. (2001). Giving an account of oneself. Diacritics, 31(4), 22–40.
Cavarero, A. (2000). Relating narratives: Storytelling and selfhood. New York: Routledge.
Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006). Doing collective biography. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Grigore, R. (2011). Fernando Pessoa’s the book of disquiet. Imagination, reality and the pleasure of masking and dreaming. Theory in Action, 4(1), 38–47.
Laing, R. D. (1965). The divided self. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
O’Connell, M. (2011). On not being found: A Winnicottian reading of John Banville’s ‘Ghosts’ and ‘Athena. Studies in the Novel, 43(3), 328–342.
Pessoa, F. (1985). A galaxy of poets. Lisbon: Servico Internacional da Fundacão Calouste Gulbenkian.
Pessoa, F. (2001). The book of disquiet (R. Zenith, Ed. and Trans.). London: Penguin Books.
Pessoa, F. (2006). A little larger than the entire universe—Selected poems (R. Zenith, Ed. and Trans.). London: Penguin Books.
Pessoa, F. (2010). The book of disquiet (M. J. Costa, Trans.). London: Serpent’s Tail Classics.
Pessoa, F. (2018). I have more souls than one (J. Griffin, Trans.). London: Penguin Modern.
Phillips, A. (1998). The beast in the nursery. London: Faber and Faber.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (1963). London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Winnicott, D. W. (2005). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simopoulou, Z. (2019). Selfhood; Eilidh and Fernando Pessoa. In: Young Children’s Existential Encounters. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10841-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10841-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10840-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10841-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)