Public Service Broadcasting and Security Issues: The Case of ‘Blowback’

  • Jake LynchEmail author


Lynch argues that British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) journalism has been in serial dereliction of its duty, as set out in public service requirements, in its reporting of a prominent and important recurrent news story: incidents of terrorism, with particular reference to those claimed by or attributed to Islamist groups; and debates over how the UK and other affected countries should respond to them. In such cases, BBC journalism tends to display the influence of familiar reporting conventions, but this puts it at odds with the obligations to accuracy and impartiality in its own Editorial Guidelines, obligations that the statutory regulator, the Office of Communications , is now charged with upholding. Lynch also compares selected issues in the coverage of such stories with equivalent issues in the regulation of news provided by the public broadcaster in Australia, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, which performs a closely analogous role to that of its British antecedent.


  1. Ammerdown Group. (2016). Rethinking Security. Retrieved August 31, 2017, from
  2. Australian Department of Defence. (2016). Defence White Paper. Retrieved August 23, 2017, from
  3. Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, W. L. (1990). Towards a Theory of Press-state Relations. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The Structure of Foreign News: The Presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in Four Norwegian Newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hallin, D. C. (1989). The Uncensored War. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, C. (2006). Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  9. Lynch, J. (2014). Anzac Day: A Fitting Codicil to a Century of War. TRANSCEND Media Service. Retrieved August 23, 2017, from
  10. Lynch, J. (2016). Picking Out the Worthwhile Bits of Chilcot. Australian Options, 84, 23–25.Google Scholar
  11. Lynch, J. (2017). Terrorism, the “blowback” Thesis and the UK Media. Peace Review, 29(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Melhem, H. (2015). Keeping Up with the Caliphate: An Islamic State for the Internet Age. Foreign Affairs, 94(6, November/December), 148–153.Google Scholar
  13. Pedelty, M. (1995). War Stories – The Culture of Foreign Correspondents. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Rogers, P. (2017, September 18). Britain’s Distant War.
  15. The Liaison Office. (2009). Three Years Later: A Socio-political Assessment of Uruzgan Province from 2006 to 2009. Kabul: The Liaison Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations