Advertisement

Pediatric Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement in a Self-Medicating Society

  • Larissa J. MaierEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Neuroethics book series (AIN)

Abstract

Pediatric pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PPCE) refers to children’ and adolescents’ nonmedical use of prescription and recreational drugs for enhanced performance at school. Adolescents’ own intentional decision for substance use to compete with fellow students must be distinguished from parental decisions to enhance their children’s performance as an investment in their children’s or in their own future, respectively. While several recent studies have examined the prevalence and the correlates of pharmacological cognitive enhancement among healthy students and employees, only little is known about PPCE among school students. Given that decision-making in adolescence is strongly modulated by emotional and social factors, peer influence, and availability, the theory of self-medication might best explain intentional PPCE in late adolescence. In addition, regular recreational drug use is likely to lower the barriers for PPCE in populations interested in enhancing their performance at school. To ensure equal developmental opportunities for today’s school students, an individual-centered approach should focus on strengthening adolescents’ resources and self-efficacy.

Keywords

Cognitive enhancement Drugs Children Adolescents Self-medication 

References

  1. Albert D, Chein J, Steinberg L (2013) Peer influences on adolescent decision making. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 22(2):114–120.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412471347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Arria AM, DuPont RL (2010) Nonmedical prescription stimulant use among college students: why we need to do something and what we need to do. J Addict Dis 29(4):417–426.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2010.509273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Arria AM, Caldeira KM, Vincent KB, O’Grady KE, Cimini MD, Geisner IM et al (2016) Do college students improve their grades by using prescription stimulants nonmedically? Addict Behav 65:245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Austic EA (2015) Peak ages of risk for starting nonmedical use of prescription stimulants. Drug Alcohol Depend 152:224–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.034CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagot KS, Kaminer Y (2014) Efficacy of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in non-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder youth: a systematic review. Addiction 109(4):547–557. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24749160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward an unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardo MT, Neisewander JL, Kelly TH (2013) Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology of abused drugs. Pharmacol Rev 65(1):255–290.  https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.111.005124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumeister RF, Campbell JD, Krueger JI, Vohs KD (2003) Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychol Sci Public Interest 4(1):1–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bell S, Partridge B, Lucke J, Hall W (2012) Australian University students’ attitudes towards the acceptability and regulation of pharmaceuticals to improve academic performance. Neuroethics 6(1):197–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9153-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blakemore SJ, Robbins TW (2012) Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nat Neurosci 15(9):1184–1191.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boot BP, Partridge B, Hall W (2012) Better evidence for safety and efficacy is needed before neurologists prescribe drugs for neuroenhancement to healthy people. Neurocase 18(3):181–184.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2011.588174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brinkman WB, Epstein JN (2011) Promoting productive interactions between parents and physicians in the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Expert Rev Neurother 11(4):579–588.  https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.10.151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Butcher J (2003) Cognitive enhancement raises ethical concerns. Lancet 362(9378):132–133. www.thelancet.comCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Compton WM, Volkow ND (2006) Abuse of prescription drugs and the risk of addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend 83(Suppl 1):S4–S7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.10.020CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz P, Striegel H, Franke AG, Lieb K, Simon P, Ulrich R (2013) Randomized response estimates for the 12-month prevalence of cognitive-enhancing drug use in university students. Pharmacotherapy 33(1):44–50.  https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Drabiak-Syed K (2011) Physicians prescribing “medicine” for enhancement: why we should not and cannot overlook safety concerns. Am J Bioeth 11(1):17–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2010.534535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Erikson EH (1968) Identity, youth and crisis. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Farah MJ, Illes J, Cook-Deegan R, Gardner H, Kandel E, King P et al (2004) Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nat Rev Neurosci 5(5):421–425.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Forlini C, Gauthier S, Racine E (2013) Should physicians prescribe cognitive enhancers to healthy individuals? Can Med Assoc J 185(12):1047–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franke AG, Bonertz C, Christmann M, Huss M, Fellgiebel A, Hildt E, Lieb K (2011) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany. Pharmacopsychiatry 44(2):60–66.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1268417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Graf WD, Nagel SK, Epstein LG, Miller G, Nass R, Larriviere D (2013) Pediatric neuroenhancement: ethical, legal, social, and neurodevelopmental implications. Neurology 80(13):1251–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318289703bCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hiatt C, Laursen B, Stattin H, Kerr M (2017) Best friend influence over adolescent problem behaviors: socialized by the satisfied. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 46(5):695–708.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1050723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Miech RA, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE (2016) Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2015: overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-overview2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaye S, Darke S (2012) The diversion and misuse of pharmaceutical stimulants: what do we know and why should we care? Addiction 107(3):467–477.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03720.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Khantzian EJ (1997) The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: a reconsideration and recent applications. Harv Rev Psychiatry 4(5):231–244. http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/10673229709030550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liakoni E, Schaub MP, Maier LJ, Glauser GV, Liechti ME (2015) The use of prescription drugs, recreational drugs, and “soft enhancers” for cognitive enhancement among Swiss Secondary School Students. PLoS One 10(10):e0141289.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Maier LJ, Schaub MP (2015) The use of prescription drugs and drugs of abuse for neuroenhancement in Europe. Eur Psychol 20(3):155–166.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maier LJ, Liechti ME, Herzig F, Schaub MP (2013) To dope or not to dope: neuroenhancement with prescription drugs and drugs of abuse among Swiss University Students. PLoS One 8(11):e77967.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077967CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Maier LJ, Haug S, Schaub MP (2015a) The importance of stress, self-efficacy, and self-medication for pharmacological neuroenhancement among employees and students. Drug Alcohol Depend 156:221–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.09.012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Maier LJ, Liakoni E, Schildmann J, Schaub MP, Liechti ME (2015b) Swiss University students’ attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement. PLoS One 10(12):e0144402.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Maier LJ, Wunderli MD, Vonmoos M, Römmelt AT, Baumgartner MR, Seifritz E et al (2015c) Pharmacological cognitive enhancement in healthy individuals: a compensation for cognitive deficits or a question of personality? PLoS One 10(6):e0129805.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Maier LJ, Haug S, Schaub MP (2016) Prevalence of and motives for pharmacological neuroenhancement in Switzerland-results from a national internet panel. Addiction 111(2):280–295.  https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13059CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Middendorff E, Poskowsky J, Isserstedt W (2012) Formen der Stresskompensation und Leistungssteigerung bei Studierenden. HIS, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagel S, Stephan A (2009) Was bedeutet Neuro-Enhancement? Potentiale, Konsequenzen, ethische Dimensionen. In: Schöne-Seifert B, Talbot D, Johann S (eds) Neuro Enhancement, Ethik vor neuen Herausforderungen. Mentis Verlag, Padborn, pp 19–47Google Scholar
  35. NICE (2018) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management | guidance and guidelines | NICE. NICE. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG87
  36. Ott R, Lenk C, Miller N, Neuhaus Bühler R, Biller-Andorno N (2012) Neuroenhancement—perspectives of Swiss psychiatrists and general practitioners. Swiss Medical Weekly, 142(November):w13707.  https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2012.13707
  37. Partridge B, Bell S, Lucke J, Hall W (2013) Australian university students’ attitudes towards the use of prescription stimulants as cognitive enhancers: perceived patterns of use, efficacy and safety. Drug Alcohol Rev 32(3):295–302.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ponnet K, Wouters E, Van Hal G, Heirman W, Walrave M (2014) Determinants of physicians’ prescribing behaviour of methylphenidate for cognitive enhancement. Psychol Health Med 19(3):286–295.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2013.802361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Racine E, Forlini C (2010) Cognitive enhancement, lifestyle choice or misuse of prescription drugs? Neuroethics 3(1):1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-008-9023-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rasmussen N (2008) On speed: the many lives of amphetamine. http://books.google.ch/books/about/On_Speed.html?id=1mf5eEG0nRUC&pgis=1
  41. Ray KS (2016) Not just “study drugs” for the rich: stimulants as moral tools for creating opportunities for socially disadvantaged students. Am J Bioeth 16(6):29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1170231CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Repantis D (2013) Psychopharmacological neuroenhancement: evidence on safety and efficacy. In: Hildt E, Franke AG (eds) Cognitive enhancement: an interdisciplinary perspective, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sabini J, Monterosso J (2005) Judgments of the fairness of using performance enhancing drugs. Ethics Behav 15(1):81–94.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1501_6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sattler S, Singh I (2016) Cognitive enhancement in healthy children will not close the achievement gap in education. Am J Bioeth 16(6):39–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1170240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schelle KJ, Faulmüller N, Caviola L, Hewstone M (2014) Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement—a review. Front Syst Neurosci 8:53.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Sherman LE, Payton AA, Hernandez LM, Greenfield PM, Dapretto M (2016) The power of the like in adolescence. Psychol Sci 27(7):1027–1035.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616645673CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh I, Kelleher KJ (2010) Neuroenhancement in young people: proposal for research, policy, and clinical management. AJOB Neurosci 1(1):3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740903508591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh I, Filipe AM, Bard I, Bergey M, Baker L (2013) Globalization and cognitive enhancement: emerging social and ethical challenges for ADHD clinicians. Curr Psychiatry Rep 15(9):385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-013-0385-0CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Teter CJ, McCabe SE, Cranford J a, Boyd CJ, Guthrie SK (2005) Prevalence and motives for illicit use of prescription stimulants in an undergraduate student sample. J Am Coll Health 53(6):253–262.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.53.6.253-262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Volkow ND, Swanson JM (2008) The action of enhancers can lead to addiction. Nature 451(7178):520.  https://doi.org/10.1038/451520aCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilens TE, Adler L, Adams J, Sgambati S, Rotrosen J, Sawtelle R et al (2008) Misuse and diversion of stimulants prescribed for ADHD: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47(1):21–31.  https://doi.org/10.1097/chi.0b013e31815a56f1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolraich M, Brown L, Brown RT, DuPaul G, Earls M, Feldman HM et al (2011) ADHD: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 128(5):1007–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood S, Sage JR, Shuman T, Anagnostaras SG (2014) Psychostimulants and cognition: a continuum of behavioral and cognitive activation. Pharmacol Rev 66(1):193–221.  https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007054CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Wulf MA, Joksimovic L, Tress W (2011) Das Ringen um Sinn und Anerkennung – Eine psychodynamische Sicht auf das Phänomen des Neuroenhancement (NE). Ethik Der Medizin 24(1):29–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-011-0137-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)San FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations