Human Sociality II: Intrinsic Sociality, Self-interest and Social Organisation

  • Amos WitztumEmail author


Synopsis : Having argued that individuals are intrinsically social, we now address the question of the organisational implications of these conclusions. As one of the key elements in modern economic analysis is the separation of the spheres of economic and social interactions, we ask whether or not the kind of sociality we identified in the previous chapter lends itself to such a conception of society. By the separation of the spheres we mean that it is possible to analyse economic interactions without any reference to the specificity and diversity—across cultures—of social interactions in other spheres of social life. Needless to say, this is a necessary condition for any attempt at retaining a position of social neutrality.


  1. Akerlof, G. A., & Yellen, J. L. (1990). The Fair Wage-effort Hypothesis and Unemployment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006a). Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 699–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006b). Incentives and Prosocial Behavior. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1652–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernheim, B. D. (1994). A Theory of Conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 841–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterly, W., Alesina, A., & Baquir, R. (1999). Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eller, J. D., & Coughlan, R. M. (1993). The Poverty of Primordialism: The Mystification of Ethnic Attachments. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16(2), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geertz, C. (1963). The Integrative Revolution: Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States. In C. Geertz (Ed.), Old Societies and New States: The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa (pp. 105–157). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Grosby, S. (1994). The Verdict of History: The Inexpungeable Tie of Primordiality—A Response to Eller and Coughlan. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 17, 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton, W. D. (1975). Innate Social Aptitudes of Man: An Approach from Evolutionary Genetics. In R. Fox (Ed.), ASA Studies 4: Biosocial Anthropology (pp. 133–153). London: Malaby Press. Reprinted in Hamilton, W. D. Narrow Roads of Gene Land: Volume 1: Evolution of Social Behaviour. New York: W. H. Freeman and Spektrum, pp. 329–351.Google Scholar
  11. Maine, H. S. (1920 [1861]). Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Societies and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  12. Seligman, A. B. (2000). Civil Society as Idea and Ideal. In S. Chambers & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society (pp. 13–33). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social SciencesLondon School of Economics and Political SciencesLondonUK

Personalised recommendations