Skip to main content

Learning the Sixth Sense

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biophysics and Neurophysiology of the Sixth Sense

Abstract

Cross-modal plasticity causes an ordinary sense to become a supernormal wisdom as a result of deprivation in one sensory modality. This ability of the brain has created a potentially fertile framework for the development of sensory substitution systems and brain-machine interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Kooij H, Jacobs R, Koopman B, Grootenboer H. A multisensory integration model of human stance control. Biol Cybern. 1999;80(5):299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bremner AJ, Holmes NP, Spence C. Infants lost in (peripersonal) space? Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12(8):298–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein BE, Stanford TR. Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(4):255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meredith MA, Kryklywy J, McMillan AJ, Malhotra S, Lum-Tai R, Lomber SG. Crossmodal reorganization in the early deaf switches sensory, but not behavioral roles of auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(21):8856–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lomber SG, Meredith MA, Kral A. Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(11):1421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bavelier D, Neville HJ. Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(6):443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lessard N, Paré M, Lepore F, Lassonde M. Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature. 1998;395(6699):278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. RoÈder B, Teder-SaÈlejaÈrvi W, Sterr A, RoÈsler F, Hillyard SA, Neville HJ. Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. Nature. 1999;400(6740):162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kupers R, Ptito M. Compensatory plasticity and cross-modal reorganization following early visual deprivation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;41:36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Merabet LB, Pascual-Leone A. Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(1):44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Visell Y. Tactile sensory substitution: models for enaction in HCI. Interact Comput. 2008;21(1–2):38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chapin JK, Moxon KA, Markowitz RS, Nicolelis MAL. Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(7):664.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Donoghue JP. Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:1085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallagher S, Meltzoff AN. The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philos Psychol. 1996;9(2) https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089608573181.

  15. Shimada S, Hiraki K, Oda I. The parietal role in the sense of self-ownership with temporal discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive feedbacks. NeuroImage. 2005;24(4):1225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Montero B. Proprioception as an aesthetic sense. J Aesthet Art Critic. 2006;64(2):231–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsakiris M, Costantini M, Haggard P. The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one’s body. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(12):3014–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roland PE, Ladegaard-Pedersen H. A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man: evidence for a peripherally originating muscular sense and for a sense of effort. Brain. 1977;100(4):671–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcel A. The sense of agency: awareness and ownership of action. In: Agency and self-awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 48–93.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salomon R, Lim M, Herbelin B, Hesselmann G, Blanke O. Posing for awareness: proprioception modulates access to visual consciousness in a continuous flash suppression task. J Vis. 2013;13(7):2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abbott A. In search of the sixth sense. Nature. 2006;442(7099):125–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35(suppl_2):ii7–ii11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tyler M, Danilov Y, Bach-y-Rita P. Closing an open-loop control system: vestibular substitution through the tongue. J Integr Neurosci. 2003;2(02):159–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barros CGC, Bittar RSM, Danilov Y. Effects of electrotactile vestibular substitution on rehabilitation of patients with bilateral vestibular loss. Neurosci Lett. 2010;476(3):123–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Danilov YP, Tyler ME, Skinner KL, Hogle RA, Bach-y-Rita P. Efficacy of electrotactile vestibular substitution in patients with peripheral and central vestibular loss. J Vestib Res. 2007;17(2, 3):119–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Horak FB. Postural compensation for vestibular loss. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1164(1):76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dozza M, Chiari L, Horak FB. Audio-biofeedback improves balance in patients with bilateral vestibular loss. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1401–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dozza M, Chiari L, Chan B, Rocchi L, Horak FB, Cappello A. Influence of a portable audio-biofeedback device on structural properties of postural sway. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2005;2(1):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chebat D-R, Schneider FC, Kupers R, Ptito M. Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals. Neuroreport. 2011;22(7):342–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagel SK, Carl C, Kringe T, Märtin R, König P. Beyond sensory substitution—learning the sixth sense. J Neural Eng. 2005;2(4):R13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Segond H, Weiss D, Sampaio E. Human spatial navigation via a visuo-tactile sensory substitution system. Perception. 2005;34(10):1231–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Graziano MSA. Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96(18):10418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maidenbaum S, Abboud S, Amedi A. Sensory substitution: closing the gap between basic research and widespread practical visual rehabilitation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;41:3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bach-y-Rita P, Collins CC, Saunders FA, White B, Scadden L. Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature. 1969;221(5184):963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sampaio E, Maris S, Bach-y-Rita P. Brain plasticity:‘visual’acuity of blind persons via the tongue. Brain Res. 2001;908(2):204–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ward J, Meijer P. Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device. Conscious Cogn. 2010;19(1):492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amedi A, Stern WM, Camprodon JA, Bermpohl F, Merabet L, Rotman S, et al. Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(6):687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Antfolk C, D’Alonzo M, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, Cipriani C. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10(1):45–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Canzoneri E, Marzolla M, Amoresano A, Verni G, Serino A. Amputation and prosthesis implantation shape body and peripersonal space representations. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dhillon GS, Horch KW. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005;13(4):468–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Elli GV, Benetti S, Collignon O. Is there a future for sensory substitution outside academic laboratories? Multisens Res. 2014;27(5–6):271–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Rezaei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saghazadeh, A., Khaksar, R., Rezaei, N. (2019). Learning the Sixth Sense. In: Rezaei, N., Saghazadeh, A. (eds) Biophysics and Neurophysiology of the Sixth Sense. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10620-1_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics