Advertisement

Directional Thought and Evolution

  • Andrew Y. GliksonEmail author
Chapter
  • 185 Downloads

Abstract

The source of the information for the links between the “hardware” and “software” required for cooperative interaction between cell elements (golgi) and the capacity of damaged DNA biomolecules for self-repair, requiring biochemical components involved in DNA replication, transcription and translation, remains little understood. Equally difficult to understand is swarm intelligence, where a multitude of particles behave instantaneously in unison. Large bodies of evidence exist for thought processes by creatures other than human, whether individual organisms or swarm intelligence. The thought process, which constitutes an intelligent directional activity, is difficult to understand in terms of natural selection where directionality results from survival of the fittest and elimination of weaker species. By distinction from the Darwinian natural selection principle, thought processes facilitated by neuron networks constitute purposeful proactive directional trajectories. Of the least understood phenomena, the capacity of the human brain to decode the very physical and chemical laws which underlie its own structure is also the most perplexing. In observing nature, the universe and itself, the human outlook has long been skewed in favor of its own self-serving outlook, admiring gods in its own self-image and evolutionary theories in terms of its own supposed superiority. This outlook, reflected in the concept of the Anthropic principle, which throws doubt on empirical scientific observations, should be capable of being circumvented through the scientific falsification method. The remarkable star, solar, magnetic, current and wind-guided navigational talents of a range of creatures—ants, bees, birds, turtles, whales—constitute capacities in no way inferior to those of many anthropogenic thought processes and instruments. Large bodies of evidence exist indicating animals can think. It is likely that human understanding of life remains subject to the decoding of hitherto unknown basic laws of physics which allow and control life.

Keywords

Thought Anthropic principle Directional Biomolecules Swarm 

References

  1. Abbott EA (1884) Flatland: a romance in many dimensions. Dover Thrift Edition, New York (1992 unabridged). https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Abbott/paper.pdf
  2. Aldhous P (2015) Does brain size matter? Mosaic. https://mosaicscience.com/extra/does-brain-size-matter/
  3. Attenborough D (2005) Life in the undergrowth. BBC Nature Documentary. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_in_the_Undergrowth
  4. Axe DD (2004) Estimating the prevalence of protein sequences adopting functional enzyme folds. J Mol Biol. 341(5):1295–315. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15321723
  5. Barrow JD, Tipler FJ (1988) The anthropic cosmological principle. Oxford University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Anthropic-Cosmological-Principle-Oxford-Paperbacks/dp/0192821474
  6. Bekoff M (2013) The birds and the bees and their brains: size doesn’t: small-brained animals display surprising and sophisticated cognitive skills. Matter. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/animal-emotions/201304/the-birds-and-the-bees-and-their-brains-size-doesnt-matter
  7. Carson R (1962) Silent springs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2002, 378 pp. http://www.rachelcarson.org/SilentSpring.aspx
  8. Davies P (2007) Yes, the universe looks like a fix. But that doesn’t mean that a god fixed it. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/jun/26/spaceexploration.comment
  9. Davies P (2008) The Goldilocks enigma: why is the universe just right for life? https://www.amazon.com/Goldilocks-Enigma-Universe-Just-Right/dp/0547053584
  10. Dunbar RIM (1992) Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J Hum Evol 22:469–493 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004724849290081J
  11. Ellis GFR (1993) The theology of the anthropic principle. http://www.counterbalance.org/ctns-vo/ellis4-body.html
  12. Filella A et al (2018) Focus: fluid interactions help fish in a school swim faster. Physics 11:46. https://physics.aps.org/articles/v11/46
  13. Fiorito G, Scotto P (1992) Observational learning in octopus vulgaris. Science 256(5056):545–547. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17787951
  14. Herculano-Houzel S (2009) The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain. Front Hum Neurosci 3:31. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/neuro.09.031.2009/full
  15. Hoyle F (1981) An astronomer’s take on god. Philosophical Society.com http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/an_astronomer’s_take_on_god.htm
  16. Joshi RR (1990) An intelligent system for DNA repair. Comput Math Appl 19:1–7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/089812219090042I
  17. Kenyon RE (1984) Popper’s philosophy of science. http://www.xenodochy.org/article/popper.html
  18. Lodish H et al (2004) Molecular biology of the cell. WH Freeman, New York, p 963Google Scholar
  19. Moran LA (2012) Sandwalk. Strolling with a skeptical biochemist. http://sandwalk.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/false-dichotomy.html
  20. Mumford L (1967) The myth of the machine. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. v.1 352 pp. v2 485 pp. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_the_Machine
  21. Mumford L (1971) Arthur Glikson: the ecological basis of planning. Springer. https://www.springer.com/us/book/9789024711932
  22. O’Brien PJ (2006) Molecular cell biology—NCBI bookshelf. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cr040481v
  23. Rees M (2012) One universe among many? Research may open the way for a conceptual shift of Copernican proportions. Prospects. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/science-big-bang-theory-new-research-astronomy
  24. Robson D (2011) A brief history of the brain. New Scientist Magazine issue 2831. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128311.800-a-brief-history-of-the-brain
  25. Rowe TB et al (2011) Fossil evidence on origin of the mammalian brain. Science 332:955–957. http://www.geo.utexas.edu/faculty/rowe/Publications/pdf/072b_Rowe%20et%20al%20Brains.pdf
  26. Storici F, Tichon EA (2017) RNA takes over control of DNA break repair. Nat Cell Biol 19:1382–1384. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncb3645
  27. Swift D (2002) Evolution under the microscope: a scientific critique of the theory of evolution. https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-Under-Microscope-Scientific-Critique/dp/0954358902
  28. Vollrath F (1979) Behaviour of the kleptoparasitic spider Argyrodes elevatus. Anim Behav 27:515–518 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003347279901866
  29. Wells HG (1898) The war of the worlds. CreativeCommons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds
  30. Wrangham R (2009) Catching fire: how cooking made us human. Basic Books, New York, 320 pp. https://www.amazon.com/Catching-Fire-Cooking-Made-Human/dp/0465013627

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research School of Earth ScienceAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations