Skip to main content

Metamodels as a Conceptual Structure: Some Semantical and Syntactical Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Art of Structuring

Abstract

Modern enterprises are under permanent pressure for change to cope with new competitors and integrate emerging technologies. These changes involve adaptation of processes, operations, architectures, value propositions, and the response to evolving market requirements—especially regarding the digitalization. Modelling methods are an established approach for the conceptual representation, design, analysis, and implementation of complex systems and have gained much attention in both, academia and industry. At the core of a modelling method is the metamodel as a formalized specification of the syntactic nature of the domain under consideration. The paper at hand amplifies the notion of metamodels toward “metamodels as a conceptual structure” and introduces semantic and syntactic operations applied to this structure. Based on recent advances in the field, this paper shows, how metamodels as a conceptual structure facilitate managing complexity in fast changing environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADOxx.org. (2018). ADOxx metamodeling platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awadid, A., Bork, D., Karagiannis, D., & Nurcan, S. (2018). Toward generic consistency paterns in multi-view enterprise modelling. In European Conference on Information Systems. Portsmouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Beverungen, D., Breuker, D., Hanns-Alexander, D., & Rauer, H. P. (2013a). Performance benchmarking for designing interaction routines-managing trade-offs in service co-creation with the data envelopment analysis. In ECIS 2013 Proceedings (p. 185).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Beverungen, D., Knackstedt, R., Matzner, M., Müller, O., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2013b). Designing interaction routines in service networks: A modularity and social construction-based approach. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., vom Brocke, J., Heddier, M., & Seidel, S. (2015). In search of information systems (grand) challenges. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(6), 337–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Eggert, M., & Schwittay, S. (2012). Generalizability and applicability of model-based business process compliance-checking approaches—A state-of-the-art analysis and research roadmap. Business Research, 5(2), 221–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bork, D. (2018). Metamodel-based analysis of domain-specific conceptual modeling methods. In 11th IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modelling (pp. 172-187). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, D., Buchmann, R., & Karagiannis, D. (2015). Preserving multi-view consistency in diagrammatic knowledge representation. In International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (pp. 177–182). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, D., & Fill, H. G. (2014). Formal aspects of enterprise modeling methods: A comparison framework. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3400–3409).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, D., Karagiannis, D., & Pittl, B. (2018). How are metamodels specified in practice? Empirical insights and recommendations. In 24th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–11). New Orleans, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Fabro, M. D., & Valduriez, P. (2007). Semi-automatic model integration using matching transformations and weaving models. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing (pp. 963–970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Efendioglu, N., Woitsch, R., & Utz, W. (2016). A toolbox supporting agile modelling method engineering: ADOxx. org modelling method conceptualization environment. In IFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (pp. 317–325). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferstl, O. K., & Sinz, E. J. (2013). Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Walter der Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferstl, O. K., Sinz, E. J., & Bork, D. (2016). Tool support for the semantic object model. Domain-specific conceptual modeling (pp. 291–310). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fill, H. G. (2011). On the conceptualization of a modeling language for semantic model annotations. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops (pp. 134–148). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Götzinger, D., Miron, E.-T., & Staffel, F. (2016). OMiLAB: An open collaborative environment for modeling method engineering. In Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling (pp. 55–76). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfferer, P. (2007). Achieving business process model interoperability using metamodels and ontologies. In European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1620–1631).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrgovcic, V., Karagiannis, D., & Woitsch, R. (2013). Conceptual modeling of the organisational aspects for distributed applications: The semantic lifting approach. In IEEE 37th Annual of Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (pp. 145–150).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3), 369–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/4178548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, D., & Buchmann, R. A. (2016). Linked open models: Extending linked open data with conceptual model information. Information Systems, 56, 174–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, D., Buchmann, R. A., & Walch, M. (2017). How can diagrammatic conceptual modelling support knowledge management? In European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1568–1583).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, D., Buchmann, R., & Bork, D. (2016). Managing consistency in multi-view enterprise models: An approach based on semantic queries. In 24th European Conference on Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, D., & Fill, H. G. (2013). On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the ADOxx meta modelling platform. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, 8(1), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, D., & Kühn, H. (2002). Metamodelling platforms. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference EC-Web, 2455 (p. 182).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, D., Mayr, H. C., & Mylopoulus, J. (2016). Domain-specific conceptual modeling. Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulus, J. (1992). Conceptual modelling and telos. Conceptual modelling, databases, and CASE: An integrated view of information system development. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prackwieser, C., Buchmann, R., Grossmann, W., & Karagiannis, D. (2013). Towards a generic hybrid simulation algorithm based on a semantic mapping and rule evaluation approach. In International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (pp. 147–160). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woitsch, R. (2013). Hybrid modelling with ADOxx: Virtual enterprise interoperability using meta models. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops (pp. 298–303). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38490-5_28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zivkovic, S., Kuhn, H., & Karagiannis, D. (2007). Facilitate modelling using method integration: An approach using mappings and integration rules. In European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 2038–2049).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Karagiannis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karagiannis, D., Bork, D., Utz, W. (2019). Metamodels as a Conceptual Structure: Some Semantical and Syntactical Operations. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics