Abstract
Artists often try to open up new experiences for people, challenging them to extend horizons and perception. This becomes particularly relevant when thinking about experiencing built environments: Here, technologies like Cave Automatic Virtual Environments (CAVE) or Head-Mounted Displays (HMD) can be used as a tool to offer richer experiences to the audience in both art installations and exhibitions. We have been developing several exhibitions tackling the challenges that come with exhibiting in (semi -) public spaces: how do we engage visitors in our exhibitions, what role do bystanders play and how can this be considered in the development and design process? The exhibitions were built in a chronological order (2015–2018) and increasing degree of immersion and interaction. For exhibition one (“step-in/Ideal Spaces”), we built a CAVE-like “tryptic” projection showing linear pre-rendered videos of seven different built environments. In exhibition two (“fly-over/Super Nubibus”) we build a replica of a hot-air-balloon and let people experience architecture from birds eye view using a HMD. Exhibition three (“cruise/Biketopia”) is also an immersive VR using a HMD, but from a very different angle. Here we use a bike to let people actively explore a space by regulating speed and direction of the bike. By using the discreet method of observation, we ensured that the visitors were not disturbed in their experience, which in turn would falsify our findings. So we are able to compare and discuss these three approaches in regards to the above mentioned criteria within this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Created by ideal spaces working group 2016 (Matthias Wölfel, Michael Johansson, Daniel Hepperle, Andreas Siess, Ulrich Gehmann et al.).
- 2.
Kuutti 2014 discusses some of the different possibilities in (semi-) public spaces [10].
References
Allen, M.: Technology in Contemporary Hollywood Cinema. Taylor & Francis, New York (2013)
Boyd, J.: Organic design for command and control (2005). https://www.ausairpower.net/JRB/organic_design.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2018
Carrozzino, M., Bergamasco, M.: Beyond virtual museums: experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J. Cult. Herit. 11, 452–458 (2010)
Eagleman, D., Brandt, A.: The Runaway Species: How Human Creativity Remakes the World. Catapult, London (2017)
Gehmann, U.: Exhibition Venice 2016–ideal spaces (2016). https://www.idealspaces.org/exhibition-venice-2016/#leonardodivinci. Accessed 29 Sept 2018
Hartson, R.: Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22(5), 315–338 (2003)
Ishii, A., et al.: ReverseCAVE. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017. ACM Press (2017)
Jellicoe, G.: Motopia: A Study in the Evolution of Urban Landscape (1961)
Kajo, M., Johansson, M.: Common playground. In: Proceedings of Cast01 (2001)
Kuutti, J., Leiwo, J., Sepponen, R.E.: Local control of audio environment: a review of methods and applications. Technologies 2(1), 31–53 (2014)
Kwatra, V., Frueh, C., Sud, A.: Headset “removal” for virtual and mixed reality. https://ai.googleblog.com/2017/02/headset-removal-for-virtual-and-mixed.html. Accessed 15 July 2018
Lister, M., Giddings, S., Dovey, J., Grant, I., Kelly, K.: New Media: A Critical Introduction. Routledge, Abingdon (2010)
Mai, C., Rambold, L., Khamis, M.: TransparentHMD: revealing the HMD user’s face to bystanders. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. MUM 2017, pp. 515–520. ACM (2017)
Maynes-Aminzade, D., Pausch, R., Seitz, S.: Techniques for interactive audience participation. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, p. 15. IEEE Computer Society (2002)
Michelis, D., Müller, J.: The audience funnel: observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a city center. Int. J. HCI 27(6), 562–579 (2011)
Mori, M.: Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]. Energy 7, 33–35 (1970)
Revresh: Para parachute! http://revresh.com/paraparachute/. Accessed 15 July 2018
Shaw, J., Groeneveld, D.: Legible city. https://www.jeffreyshawcompendium.com/portfolio/legible-city/. Accessed 15 Sept 2018
Sieß, A., Häffner, N., Wölfel, M.: Color preference differences between head mounted displays and PC screens. IEEE (2018)
Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence-Teleop. Virt. Environ. 6(6), 603–616 (1997)
Somniacs: Birdly - the ultimate dream of flying. http://www.somniacs.co/. Accessed 15 July 2018
Tyrrell, J., Bancroft, J., Gerald, M.: Sharing VR through green screen mixed reality video (2017). https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/sharing-vr-through-green-screen-mixed-reality-video. Accessed 12 June 2018
Zenner, A., Kosmalla, F., Speicher, M., Daiber, F., Krüger, A.: A projection-based interface to involve semi-immersed users in substitutional realities. IEEE (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Siess, A., Hepperle, D., Wölfel, M., Johansson, M. (2019). Worldmaking: Designing for Audience Participation, Immersion and Interaction in Virtual and Real Spaces. In: Brooks, A., Brooks, E., Sylla, C. (eds) Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT DLI 2018 2018. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06133-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06134-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)