Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Beckert, J. (2010). How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31(5), 605–627.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. (2015). INVEST – Zuschuss für Wagniskapital: Ein Programm für junge innovative Unternehmen und private Investoren. Retrieved from http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/Publikationen/invest-zuschuss-fuer-wagniskapital,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi2012,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf
Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Chiapello, E., & Godefroy, G. (2017). The dual function of judgment devices. Why does the plurality of market classifications matter? Historical Social Research, 42(1), 152–188.
Google Scholar
Cole, S. (Ed.). (2001). What’s wrong with sociology? New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 181–235.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10–27.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (2015). The knowledge corrupters: Hidden consequences of the financial takeover of public life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2007). Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 149–179.
Google Scholar
Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
European Commission. (2016). Capital markets union: New rules to support investment in venture capital and social enterprises [Press release]. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-2481_en.htm
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2015a). Normativität und Macht. Zur analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar
Glänzel, G., & Scheuerle, T. (2016). Social impact investing in Germany: Current impediments from investors’ and social entrepreneurs’ perspectives. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1638–1668.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A., & Useem, B. (2012). Putting values and institutions back into the theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 30(1), 37–47.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 358–379.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellchaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.
Google Scholar
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.
Google Scholar
Mische, A. (2002). Cross-talk in movements: Reconceiving the culture-network link. In M. Diani & D. McAdam (Eds.), Social movement and networks: Relational approaches to collective action (pp. 258–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1675–1715.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2010). Structural folds: Generative disruption in overlapping groups. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1150–1190.
Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar