Abstract
This chapter seeks a deeper understanding of local government groups’ financial sustainability by analysing consolidated financial statements. Its aim is to evaluate how measures of local government financial stability change when the analysis centres on consolidated, rather than separate, financial statements.
Financial statement results are analysed for sustainability, flexibility, and vulnerability. A benchmark analysis is implemented to determine if assessments of financial sustainability differ between separate versus consolidated financial statements.
The results reveal a clear difference between the separate and consolidated financial statement outcomes. The presence of dependent municipal entities leads to different considerations about financial sustainability than those emerging from analyses of separate financial statements. The difference arises in all three dimensions: sustainability, flexibility, and vulnerability. None of the local governments achieved the same ranking across the two financial statements.
Although the empirical analysis involves the Italian context, the results provide useful insight for the wider international debate on harmonization processes, as initiated by the European Commission. Assessing consolidated financial statements requires a clear identification of the “boundary” of the financial statement. This point presupposes that reporting entities have to be carefully identified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The sample includes three regional capital and 14 provincial capital governments. In geographical terms, 4 local governments are located in the northwest, 11 in the northeast, and 3 in central Italy.
- 2.
Tables A.2, A.3, and A.4 are available in the Appendix to this chapter.
References
Anessi Pessina, E. (2007). L’evoluzione dei sistemi contabili pubblici. Aspetti critici nella prospettiva aziendale. Milano: Egea.
Avsar, V., Karayalcin, C., & Ulubasoglu, M. A. (2013). State-Owned Enterprises, Inequality, and Political Ideology. Economics and Politics, 25(3), 387–410.
Benito, B., Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2007). The Harmonization of Government Financial Information Systems: The Role of the IPSASs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 293–317.
Bergmann, A., Grossi, G., Rauskala, I., & Fuchs, S. (2016). Consolidation in the Public Sector: Methods and Approaches in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), 763–783.
Bird, S. M., Cox, D., Farewell, V. T., Goldstein, H., Holt, T., & Smith, P. C. (2005). Performance Indicators: Good, Bad, and Ugly. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 168(1), 1–27.
Bisogno, M., Santis, S., & Tommasetti, A. (2015). Public-Sector Consolidated Financial Statements: An Analysis of the Comment Letters on IPSASB’s Exposure Draft No. 49. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 311–324.
Bracci, E., Humphrey, C., Moll, J., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Public Sector Accounting, Accountability and Austerity: More than Balancing the Books? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(6), 878–908.
Brown, K. W. (1993). The 10-Point Test of Financial Condition: Toward an Easy-to-Use Assessment Tool for Smaller Cities. Government Finance Review, 9(6), 21–26.
Brown, K. W. (1996). Trends in Key Ratios Using the GFOA Financial Indicators Databases 1989–1993. Government Finance Review, 12(6), 30–34.
Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2010). Developments in Financial Information by Local Entities in Europe. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 22(3), 299–324.
Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2015). Drivers for the Financial Condition of Local Government: A Comparative Study Between Italy and Spain. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 13(2), 161–184.
Cabaleiro, R., Buch, E., & Vaamonde, A. (2012). Developing a Method to Assessing the Municipal Financial Health. The American Review of Public Administration, 20(10), 1–23.
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). (2009, May). Statement of Recommended Practice SORP 4, Indicators of Financial Condition. Toronto: CICA.
Carini, C., Giacomini, D., & Teodori, C. (2019). Accounting Reform in Italy and Perceptions on the Local Government Consolidated Report. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(3), 195–204. [Online First, January 2018, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group].
Carini, C., Rocca, L., Teodori, C., & Veneziani, M. (2016). Il bilancio consolidato negli enti locali: prime considerazioni sulla qualità della regolamentazione in Italia. Azienda Pubblica, 2, 145–169.
Carini, C., Rocca, L., Veneziani, M., & Teodori, C. (2017). The Reporting Entity in Private-Public Accounting Harmonisation. Is Control Enough for the Local Government Consolidated Financial Statements? Financial Reporting, 1, 5–29.
Carini, C., Rocca, L., Veneziani, M., & Teodori, C. (2018). The Reporting Entity Concept in the Public Consolidated Financial Statement. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(1), 1–21.
Carmeli, A. (2002). A Conceptual and Practical Framework of Measuring Performance of Local Authorities in Financial Terms: Analysing the Case of Israel. Local Government Studies, 28(1), 21–36.
Christiaens, J., Cauwenberge, P., & Rommel, J. (2009). IPSAS 6 and 22-New Standards for Whole of Governmental Accounting? Public Money and Management, 29(4), 216–226.
Christiaens, J., Brecht, R., & Rollé, C. (2010). Impact of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Information Systems: A Comparative Study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 537–554.
Corte dei Conti. (2016). Rapporto 2016 sul coordinamento della finanza pubblica. Roma.
Cottarelli, C. (2014). Programma di razionalizzazione delle partecipate locali. Roma.
European Commission. (2013, March). Towards Implementing Harmonized Public Sector Accounting Standards in Member States. The Suitability of IPSAS for the Member States.
Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (1999). Statement n. 34 – Basic Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments. Norwalk: GASB.
Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2008). Municipal Corporatization in Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 10(5), 597–617.
Grossi, G., & Soverchia, M. (2011). European Commission Adoption of IPSAS to Reform Financial Reporting. Abacus, 47(4), 525–552.
Grossi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Pursuing Private or Public Accountability in the Public Sector? Applying IPSASs to Define the Reporting Entity in Municipal Consolidation. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 325–334.
Groves, S. M. (1980). Evaluating Financial Condition: An Executive Overview for Local Government: Handbook No. 1. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
Groves, S. M., Godsey, W. M., & Shulman, M. A. (1981). Financial Indicators for Local Government. Public Budgeting and Finance, 1(2), 5–19.
Groves, S. M., Godsey, W. M., & Shulman, M. A. (2003). Evaluating Financial Condition: A Handbook of Local Government. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
Heald, D., & Hodges, R. (2015). Will “Austerity” Be a Critical Juncture in European Public Sector Financial Reporting? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(6), 993–1015.
Hendrick, R. (2004). Assessing and Measuring the Fiscal Heath of Local Governments: Focus on Chicago Suburban Municipalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(1), 78–114.
Hood, C. (1995). The New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109.
Hoque, Z., & Moll, J. (2001). Public Sector Reform – Implications for Accounting, Accountability and Performance of Stateowned Entities – An Australian Perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(4), 304–326.
IFAC – Public Sector Committee. (1996). Study 8 – The Government Financial Reporting Entity. New York: International Federation of Accountants.
International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board. (2012, October). Measuring Financial Performance in Public Sector Financial Statements. Conceptual Framework Task Force.
Jones, R. H., & Caruana, J. (2015). EPSAS – Worrying the Wrong End of the Stick? International Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 240–252.
Kleine, R., Kloha, P., & Weissert, C. (2003). Monitoring Local Government Fiscal Health: Michigan’s New 10 Points Scale of Fiscal Distress. Government Finance Review, 19(3), 18–23.
Kloha, P., Weissert, C. S., & Kleine, R. (2005). Someone to Watch Over Me: State Monitoring of Local Fiscal Conditions. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 236–255.
Kowalski, P., Büge, M., Sztajerowska, M., & Egeland, M. (2013). State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implication. Trade Policy Paper, 147, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Lombrano, A., & Zanin, L. (2013). IPSAS and Local Government Consolidated Financial Statements-Proposal for a Territorial Consolidation Method. Public Money and Management, 33(6), 429–436.
Manes Rossi, F., Jorge, S., Jesus, M. A., & Caperchione, E. (2015). Introduction to a Symposium on New Challenges for Public-Sector Accounting: IPSAS, Budgetary Reporting, and National Accounts. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 237–239.
Mercer, T., & Gilbert, M. (1996). A Financial Condition Index for Nova Scotia Municipalities. Government Finance Review, 12(5), 36–38.
Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze. (2016). Rapporto sulle partecipazioni pubbliche. Roma.
PwC. (2006). National Financial Sustainability. Study of Local Government Commissioned by the Australian Local Government Association. Sydney: LGA.
Ryan, C., Robinson, M., & Trevor, G. (2000). Financial Performance Indicators for Australian Local Governments. Accounting, Accountability and Performance, 6(2), 89–106.
Sannino, G. (2016). Il framework nel modello IAS/IFRS. In AA.VV., Il bilancio secondo i principi contabili internazionali IAS/IFRS. Torino: Giappichelli.
Scarpa, C., Bianchi, P., Bortolotti, B., & Pellizzola, L. (2010). Il capitalismo municipale in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Teodori, C. (2012). Il bilancio consolidato. La metodologia di costruzione e il profilo informativo. Milano: Giuffrè.
Teodori, C., & Falini, A. (2009). Il capitalismo municipale in Lombardia. Milano: Irer.
Trussel, J. M., & Patrick, P. A. (2018, in press.). Assessing and Ranking the Financial Risk of Municipal Governments: The Case of Pennsylvania. Journal of Applied Accounting Research.
Turley, G., Robbins, G., & McNena, S. (2015). A Framework to Measure the Financial Performance of Local Governments. Local Government Studies, 41(3), 401–420.
Walker, R. G. (2009). Public Sector Consolidated Statements – An Assessment. Abacus, 45(2), 171–220.
Walker, R. G. (2011). Issues in the Preparation of Public Sector Consolidated Statements. Abacus, 47(4), 477–500.
Wang, X., Dennis, L., & Tu, Y. S. (2007). Measuring Financial Condition: A Study of U.S. States. Public Budgeting and Finance, 27(2), 1–21.
Zafra Gómez, J. L., López Hernández, A. M., & Hernández Bastida, A. (2009a). Developing a Model to Measure Financial Condition in Local Government. The American Review of Public Administration, 39, 425–449.
Zafra Gómez, J. L., López Hernández, A. M., & Hernández Bastida, A. (2009b). Developing an Alert System for Local Governments in Financial Crisis. Public Money and Management, 29(3), 175–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carini, C., Teodori, C. (2019). Making Financial Sustainability Measurement More Relevant: An Analysis of Consolidated Financial Statements. In: Caruana, J., Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S., Manes Rossi, F. (eds) Financial Sustainability of Public Sector Entities. Public Sector Financial Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06037-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06037-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06036-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06037-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)