Skip to main content

What Corporate Strategists Can Learn from International Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration: A Conceptual Architecture for Transformative Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Strategic Management

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

The year 2015 saw an agreement of 195 member countries of the United Nations to adopt what is known as 17 “Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”, a joint commitment to end poverty, ensure prosperity for all and protect the integrity of the planet (United Nations, 2014).These Global Goals, officially known as “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” provide a global framework for the world’s actors to effect significant large system change. They focus on globally intractable issues such as complete eradication of poverty and hunger, good health and wellbeing for all, gender equality, and reduced inequality, among other laudable and exceedingly difficult goals. Companies are increasingly part of addressing the Global Goals in multi-stakeholder initiatives. This chapter suggests that corporate strategists can learn from these international multi-stakeholder initiatives about how to shift companies towards sustainable world-making. Based on successful cases of international collaboration it introduces a radically new approach to strategy: the concept of stewarding transformative changes collectively. It reflects on transformative design principles that made international stakeholder collaboration for sustainability successful and suggests bringing collaborative human competencies back into the focus of strategy design and implementation. The chapter redefines sustainability-oriented strategic management as the achievement of a dynamic vitality that positively impacts the wellbeing of internal stakeholders, the financial viability of the company and the society. On this basis a conceptual architecture is introduced that functions as a meta-level guidance to improve existing strategic management frameworks in the three phases co-sensing, co-designing and co-creating. The chapter concludes with an outlook on how transformative processes can accelerate sustainability transformations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the “Planetary Boundaries” see also Chap. 1.

  2. 2.

    Source of information: personal interview with a member of the German Initiative for Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO).

  3. 3.

    Source of information: personal interview with a member of the German Initiative for Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO).

  4. 4.

    See: http://www.globalcoffeeplatform.org/about/our-history accessed on 1st July 2017.

  5. 5.

    For a critical discussion of the “Shared Value” concept see Chap. 4.

  6. 6.

    The list of design principles have been derived from practice experience, extensive practitioner exchange, research interviews into success factors as well as analysis of the academic discourse on global multi-stakeholder collaboration initiative (Kuenkel, 2017; Kuenkel & Aitken, 2015).

  7. 7.

    For elaboration on the Anthropocene see also Chaps. 1 and 4.

References

  • Batie, S. S. (2008). Wicked problems and applied economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(5), 1176–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisheim, M. (2011). Innovative Governance durch Entwicklungspartnerschaften? Chancen und Grenzen am Beispiel transnationaler Wasserpartnerschaften, SWP-Studie Nr. 2011/20 (pp. 5–29). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M., & Linsky, M. (2016, Winter). Leading change through adaptive design. Stanford Social Innovation Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., Man-san Chan, A. M., & Pattberg, P. (2007). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Does the promise hold? In P. Glasbergen, F. Biermann, & A. Mol (Eds.), Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M., & McKelvey, B. (2011). Complexity and organization-environment relations: Revisiting Ashby᾿s law of requisite variety. In The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 279–298). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, H., & Woodhill, J. (2015). The MSP guide: How to design and facilitate multi-stakeholder partnerships. Wageningen: Centre for Development Innovation, University of Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, S, C, Wilson, K. A., & Salas, E. (2005). The use of a team-based strategy for organizational transformation: Guidance for moving toward a high reliability organization. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(6), 509-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (2006). Wicked problems & social complexity (p. 11). Napa, USA: CogNexus Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Walsh, J. P. (2015). Research in organizational behavior, toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2012). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • HayGroup. (2011). Building the new leader. Leadership challenges of the future revealed. Leadership 2030. Retrieved September 26, 2013, from http://www.haygroup.com/Leadership2030/downloads/Hay_Group_Leadership_2030_whitepaper.pdf

  • Hayward, R., Lee, J., Keeble, J., McNamara, R., Hall, C., Cruse, S., et al. (2013). The UN global compact-accenture CEO study on sustainability 2013. UN Global Compact Reports, 5(3), 1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, K., & Kangas, O. (2003). When is a change big enough to be a system shift? Small system-shifting changes in German and Finnish pension policies. Social Policy, and Administration, 37(6), 573–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hütz-Adams, F., Huber, C., Knoke, I., Morazan, P., & Mürlebach, M. (2016). Strengthening the competitiveness of cocoa production and improving the income of cocoa producers in West and Central Africa. Bonn: Südwinde.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (2016). Humanity in a creative universe. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG International. (2012). In Y. De Boer & B. van Bergen (Eds.), Expect the unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. Amsterdam Netherlands: KPMG International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P. (2015). Navigating change in complex multi-actor settings: A practice approach to better collaboration. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P. (2016). The art of leading collectively: How we can co-create a sustainable, socially just future. Claremont, NH: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P. (2017). A pattern approach to sustainability transformation – How the 17 SDG can become a starting point for systemic change. Collective Leadership Studies, 5. ISSN 2569-1171. Potsdam/Germany: The Collective Leadership Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P. (2018). Stewarding systems change – A conceptual architecture for transformative designs. Collective Leadership Studies, 7. Potsdam/Germany: Collective Leadership Institute. ISSN 2569-1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P. (2019). Stewarding sustainability transformations. An emerging theory and practice. Report to the Club of Rome. New York: Springer. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P., & Aitken, A. (2015). Key factors for the successful implementation of stakeholder partnerships: The case of the African Cashew initiative. In V. Bitzer, R. Haman, M. Hall, & E. W. Griffin (Eds.), The business of social and environmental innovation: New frontiers in Africa. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P., Gerlach, S., & Frieg, V. (2011). Working with stakeholder dialogues: Key concepts and competencies for achieving common goals. A practical guide for change agents from public sector, private sector and civil society. Potsdam, Germany: The Collective Leadership Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P., & Kühn, E. (2018). Leveraging multi-stakeholder collaboration for systemic change in responsible value chains: Six principles for transformative process designs. Collective Leadership Studies, 6. ISSN 2569-1171. Potsdam, Germany: Collective Leadership Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P. & Schaefer, K. (2013). Shifting the way we co-create: How we can turn the challenges of sustainability into opportunities. Collective Leadership Studies No 1. Potsdam, Germany: The Collective Leadership Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations. Brussels: Nelson Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2014). Transnational multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development.building blocks for success. IVM Report, R-14/31. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, B. J. (2015). Holacracy: The new management system for a rapidly changing world. New York, US: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, F. S., Chapin, I. I. I., Lambin, E., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A., & Berry, M. A. (2000). Environmental citizenship in multinational corporations: Social responsibility and sustainable development. European Management Journal, 18(1), 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Hamilton, H., & Kania, J. (2015, Winter). The dawn of system’s leadership. Stanford Social Innovation Review. (detailed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. (2011). The partnering toolbook. An essential guide to cross-sector partnering. Oxford, UK: The Partnering Initiative. Retrieved from http://thepartneringinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Partnering-Toolbook-en-20113.pdf

  • United Nations. (2014). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. New York, NY, USA: United Nations. Retrieved June 23, 2017, from http://www.un.org/sg/management/pdf/HLP_P2015_Report.pdf

  • Waddell, S. (2016). Societal change systems: A framework to address wicked problems. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(4), 422–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316666374

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Kuenkel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuenkel, P. (2019). What Corporate Strategists Can Learn from International Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration: A Conceptual Architecture for Transformative Change. In: Wunder, T. (eds) Rethinking Strategic Management. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06014-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics