Skip to main content

Asian Energy and Environmental Challenges in Era of Globalization: The Case of LNG

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

In a context marked by tensions on energy markets (oil and gas in particular) and the constant rise of environmental concerns, several Asian countries are exploring the most promising ways to reconcile economic growth, energy consumption and respect for the environment in a globalized world. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) has emerged as the most appropriate energy to meet environmental criteria due to its multiple advantages: cleanliness, energy efficiency, cost competitiveness and flexibility. As a partner in renewable energies, it is the energy of the future that will play a decisive role in the energy transition. LNG growth is due to technological innovations in the shipping industry. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the issue of environmental and energy challenges in the era of globalization in the Asian region. Hence, this chapter consists of four main sections. The first section highlights the recent trends in the LNG industry which have led to the emergence of new techniques, new processes and new markets. Recent developments in LNG markets have also been discussed in this section with a special focus on the “Big 5” Asian buyers. The second and most important section describes the key commercial aspects of LNG, namely LNG pricing, LNG contracts and contract renegotiation, particularly in the new context of US LNG exports. The third section focuses on the issue of globalization of LNG markets and contributes to current affairs debate on the creation of an LNG trading hub in Asia. The fourth and last section is devoted to the environmental aspects of LNG use and to discuss the intentions of the main importing countries for an energy mix in favour of LNG and other less polluting (renewable) energy. Due to data constraints, we favour the descriptive approach—this approach is nowadays neglected—which constitutes a solid basis for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Natural gas is produced from associated gas of oil fields or independent gas fields, comprised mainly of methane. Because it is in gaseous form at normal temperature/pressure, transported by pipeline in the gaseous form, or by tanker as LNG after becoming a liquid form by being cooled to −162 °C, either method of which is adopted.

  2. 2.

    The modern LNG industry began in September 1964 with the delivery by of the first shipment of 27,000 m3 of Algerian methane on board the “Methane Princess” vessel bound for Convey Island regasification terminal in Great Britain. Methane Princess arrived at his destination on 12 October 1964, after a journey of 1600 miles (2600 km).

  3. 3.

    Compagnie Algérienne de Méthane Liquide.

  4. 4.

    Throughout this chapter, we use the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) definition of the Asia and Oceania region.

  5. 5.

    Estimates of Unconventional gases remain speculative. Thus, it should be recalled that the figures of “recoverable resources” made public by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) are for some countries (provisional figures in T.m3), as follows: China 36.1; USA 24.4; Argentina 21.9; Mexico 19.3; South Africa 13.7; Brazil 6.4; Poland 5.3; France 5.1; total world 197 T.m3.

  6. 6.

    SECA: Sulphur Emission Control Area.

  7. 7.

    ECA: Emission Control Area.

  8. 8.

    The first LNG mega-trains in the world were inaugurated in Qatar, and they still have no equivalent today.

  9. 9.

    See, for example, the International Gas Union (IGU), [49] World LNG Report.

  10. 10.

    According to a new, the existing fleet of small LNG vessels consists of 27 LNG carriers and 17 LNG/LPG carriers plus some LNG bunkering units.

  11. 11.

    On this subject, see in particular: PwC [81], Verians [96].

  12. 12.

    Australia was ranked as the fourth largest exporter of LNG in the world in 2010, after Qatar, Indonesia and Malaysia, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Australia is now the world’s second-largest LNG exporter. It will become the world’s largest LNG exporter by 2020.

  13. 13.

    According to the GIIGNL definition, the duration of a short-term contract is less than or equal to 4 years.

  14. 14.

    The re-export must also cover the costs of handling the LNG in the port where the re-export will take place.

  15. 15.

    Qatar is currently the leader with low gas production costs ranging from 0 to $2 per MMBtu. This is also the case in some regions of Russia. Similarly, in 2011, this country alone accounted for one-third of LNG traded on the spot and short-term market, followed by Nigeria (12%) and Trinidad & Tobago (11%). Moreover, it accounted for 31% of all international LNG trade, with 75.4 Mt.

  16. 16.

    See https://gcaptain.com/first-lng-cargo-from-new-us-export-terminal-changes-course-for-britain/.

  17. 17.

    Petrostrategies, p. 4, 17 September 2018.

  18. 18.

    In comparison with 2010, imports recorded their highest annual growth rate (+9.9%).

  19. 19.

    Unless otherwise noted, all figures in this section are taken from the latest report “IGU 2018 World LNG Report” available on website: www.igu.org/news/2018-world-lng-report.

  20. 20.

    GIIGNL [33], The LNG industry, GIIGNL annual report 2018.

  21. 21.

    Indonesia began exporting LNG in 1977 and, in 1984, had overtaken Algeria to become the world’s leading supplier of this product.

  22. 22.

    Called also “Chinese Taipei.” For an explanation of this term, see for example:

    —What is “Chinese Taipei”? The Economist, Apr 9th 2018 also available on www.economist.com.

    —Why is Taiwan Called Chinese Taipei?, available on www.scienceabc.com/social-science/why-is-taiwan-called-chinese-taipei.html.

  23. 23.

    To understand China’s energy strategy, in particular its international strategy through its three state companies, NOCs (Sinopec, PetroChina and CNOOC), we refer the reader to Suisheng [94] article.

  24. 24.

    This itinerary shortens the voyage for US LNG to Asia by 22 days and saves approximately 30% in cost per roundtrip.

  25. 25.

    Crossing the Northern Sea Route in the Arctic allows for a 30% reduction in CO2.

  26. 26.

    See more details below.

  27. 27.

    Globally, World gas trade is around 70% by pipeline and 30% as LNG. In 2017, LNG’s share in total trade has increased to 32% (versus 30% in 2015).

  28. 28.

    Another classification exists. It breaks down the market into two distinct LNG trade regions: Atlantic Basin versus Pacific Basin.

  29. 29.

    In all three markets, there are significant price differences between the North American market (US Henry Hub) and the Asian market (Japan LNG), and an intermediate price for the European market (UK NBP). Much of the difference is due to the freight differential, due to the remoteness of the European and Asian markets from major sources of LNG supply. The gap has narrowed in recent years and is now only a few dollars.

  30. 30.

    Consumer contracts normally cover a period of 20–30 years with volume and price commitments. This is the most common form of pricing for direct sales to consumers in developing countries.

  31. 31.

    Delivered ex-ship or Ex-ship contract: in an LNG ex-ship contract, ownership of the LNG transfers to the buyer as the LNG is unloaded at the receiving terminal; payment is due at that time. The two terms are used mainly in LNG shipping contracts. See the Glossary of LNG Terms, published by Petroleum Economist and PwC, 2006.

  32. 32.

    Free on board: in an LNG FOB contract, the buyer lifts the LNG from the liquefaction plant and is responsible for transporting the LNG to the receiving terminal. The buyer is responsible for the shipping, either owning the LNG ships or chartering them from a ship-owner. In a FOB contract, the seller requires assurance that the shipping protocols provide a safe and reliable off take for the LNG to prevent disruption to the Sales and Purchase Agreement (SPA).

  33. 33.

    See Appendix 1.

  34. 34.

    Incoterms is a registered trademark of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

  35. 35.

    A few years ago, at the tenth ministerial session of the member countries of the Gas-Exporting Countries Forum (GECF), held in April 2010 in Oran, the countries of this forum agreed to index gas prices to oil prices on the spot market (short term).

  36. 36.

    IEA, Gas Resiliency Assessment of Japan, 2016.

  37. 37.

    According to the GIIGNL definition, the short term is less than or equal to 4 years.

  38. 38.

    In Asia, long-term LNG contracts have begun a wave of price renegotiation and reviews. Examples include the renegotiations between: India versus Qatar, India versus Australia, India versus Russia, China versus Qatar, China versus Australia and South Korea versus Qatar.

  39. 39.

    More recently, for Driftwood LNG project, Tellurian offers potential LNG customers several formulas: two classical formulas (buy LNG from the liquefaction plant or lease processing capacity for your own gas) and an innovative formula which involves joining as an investor, with a share in the project’s entire value chain, including access to gas production, gas transmission and liquefaction (see Petrostrategies [77]).

  40. 40.

    It should be noted that most of the LNG projects being considered in the United States are located along the Gulf of Mexico. The only exception is Jordan Cove, a project located on the West Coast. It would therefore compete with Canadian projects in the region for proximity to Asian markets.

  41. 41.

    In October 2018, the average price of spot-LNG imported into Japan was contracted is $10.7 per MMBtu.

  42. 42.

    Our own translation of the original French text.

  43. 43.

    See Shahbaz et al. [88] regarding definition of globalization.

  44. 44.

    See Yergin [100].

  45. 45.

    Brito and Hartley [9].

  46. 46.

    For more details, see Sect. 2.1.1.

  47. 47.

    For more details on these results, visit energy post’s website at http://www.energypost.eu/globalisation-gas-market-going-longer-think/.

  48. 48.

    For more details, see the following link http://www.gasstrategies.com/blogs/drawn-out-ball-game-asian-spot-lng-prices-stay-below-long-term-contract-prices.

  49. 49.

    According to the new 5th Strategic Energy Plan adopted by Cabinet decision on July 2018, the aim is for nuclear energy to account for 20–22% of energy output by 2030. There are five plants with a total of nine reactors that have met the new standards. For further discussion refer to the website of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry http://www.meti.go.jp.

  50. 50.

    See ADB [2].

  51. 51.

    World Gas Conference, Kuala Lumpur, June 5, 2012.

  52. 52.

    The report is entitled “Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas.”

  53. 53.

    There has been a growing interest in hydrogen for several years. Indeed, hydrogen, the only non-carbon fuel, is found in abundance on Earth, in the form of water or hydrocarbons, mainly in Argentina, Australia, Chile, Morocco, Oman, Saudi Arabia or South Africa. The multiple advantages of this gas make it a very efficient energy vector by 2050 and beyond. For more information on this topic, see—for example—ACIL Allen Consulting [1], Commonwealth of Australia [11], McKinsey [65] and METI [68].

  54. 54.

    At year end 2017, the R/P ratio for the natural gas was 52.6% compared to 61.9 in 2001.

  55. 55.

    So the 4A’s are abundance, availability, affordability and acceptability.

  56. 56.

    For the definition of this term, see for example www.planete-energies.com/en/medias/close/about-energy-mix.

  57. 57.

    GECF (Gas-Exporting Countries Forum) countries possess two-thirds of proven conventional gas reserves and have the ability to provide a secure gas supply. The development and integration of gas networks can improve access to energy, stimulate development and improve welfare. Doha, the capital city of Qatar, hosts the permanent headquarters of the Secretariat of the GECF.

  58. 58.

    DBS Bank, Asian Insights SparX report, 2030 Energy Mix, 5 July 2018.

  59. 59.

    More detailed information is available on the METI website.

  60. 60.

    Moon Jae-in was elected by a landslide on 9 May 2017 to replace ousted President Park Geun-hye.

  61. 61.

    Regarding the reform of South Korea’s energy industry, see the OIES paper, NG 132, “South Korea’s Energy Policy Change and the Implications for its LNG Imports,” Keun Wook Paik, June 2018.

  62. 62.

    In order to address the challenges of climate change, the signatory countries to COP21 agreed on 3 main objectives:

    (i) Maintaining temperatures below 2 °C (by 2100) above pre-industrial levels and taking all possible measures to prevent temperatures from rising by more than 1.5 °C;

    (ii) Resilience and adaptation to climate change, in particular through “low carbon” development and;

    (iii) Adoption of financing methods to achieve this “low carbon” development.

  63. 63.

    This subject has generated long and often contradictory debates between the Pros and Cons in the USA and outside this country that initiated this process. For this reason, we cannot deal with this subject in detail in this chapter. However, we refer the interested reader to the question of the exploitation of non-conventional gases (shale gas in particular) to consult the following reports, studies and publications (non-exhaustive list): Deijns [14], Le [60], UNCTAD [95].

  64. 64.

    See, for example, Sax J. Is Fracking Good or Bad? August 13, 2014 [Online]. http://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2014/08/13/is-fracking-good-or-bad/(page consulted 26 September 2018).

  65. 65.

    See website www.diplomatie.gouv.fr.

References

  1. ACIL Allen Consulting (2018) Opportunities for Australia from hydrogen exports. ACIL Allen Consulting for ARENA, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  2. ADB (2017) Meeting asia’s infrastructure needs. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/227496/special-report-infrastructure.pdf

  3. Aleshkovski A, Mishchenko Y (2017) Russia’s role in the global energy markets. J Globalization Stud 84–91

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asche F, Oglend A, Osmundsen P (2012) Gas versus oil prices the impact of shale gas. Energy Policy 47:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ayoub A (2001) Mondialisation, déficit démocratique et réglementations internationales dans le secteur de l’énergie, Colloque international du Réseau MONDER, « Mondialisation – Énergie – Environnement », 10-13 June 2001, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black & Veatch (2016) 2016 Strategic Directions: Natural Gas Industry Report. https://www.bv.com/docs/reports-studies/sdr-natural-gas.pdf

  7. BP (2018) BP statistical review of world energy 2018. http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview

  8. BP (2015) BP statistical review of world energy 2015. http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview

  9. Brito DL, Hartley PR (2007) Expectations and the evolving world gas market. Energy J 28(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Claude PM (2013) Energy efficiency opimisation. Green Shipping Summit, Genova

    Google Scholar 

  11. Commonwealth of Australia (2018) Hydrogen for Australia’s future: a briefing paper for the COAG Energy Council, Aug 2018

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davis JD (1984) Blue gold: the political economy of natural gas. Springer, Netherlands, p 1984

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. DBS Bank (2018) Asian Insights SparX report, 2030 Energy Mix, July 5, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deijns J (2014) Shale gas—environmental aspects, technical parameters and explorations in TIMER, Research Project (56.25 ECTS), Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (PBL) Energy Science (Utrecht University)

    Google Scholar 

  15. DNV-GL (2018) Maritime Fuel Cell Applications Technologies and ongoing developments, February 2018

    Google Scholar 

  16. DNV GL (2018) Global Sulphur Cap 2020, Compliance options and implications for shipping – focus on scrubbers, Extended and Updated in 2018

    Google Scholar 

  17. Drewry Maritime Research (2018) Shipping Insight, Monthly Analysis of the Shipping Markets, December 2018

    Google Scholar 

  18. EIA (2013) Annual energy outlook 2013, May 2013. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo13/

  19. EIA (2014) Annual energy outlook 2014, May 2014. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo14/

  20. EIA (2015) Annual energy outlook 2015, Apr 2015. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo15/

  21. EIA (2016) Annual energy outlook 2016, Sept 2016. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo16/

  22. EIA (2017a) Annual energy outlook 2017, Jan 2017. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/

  23. EIA (2017b) Perspectives on the Development of LNG Market Hubs in the Asia Pacific Region, March 2017. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/lng/asia/pdf/lngasia.pdf

  24. EIA (2018) Annual energy outlook 2018, Feb 2018. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/

  25. El-Medioni A (2017) Tokyo a possible HUB for LNG spot trade. Research paper

    Google Scholar 

  26. Enerdata (2018) Asian and European gas prices will converge by 2030, April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  27. Enincon consulting (2018) LNG business and market outlook in India—2018, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fraser P (2017) Gas market report 2017, Oslo, 5th Sept 2017, IEA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fulwood M (2018) Asian LNG trading hubs: myth or reality. Center on Global Energy Policy, Columbia SIPA, May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gas Strategies (2017) 2017 LNG Demand: China and Europe drive growth. Available at: http://www.gasstrategies.com/blogs/2017-lng-demand-china-and-europe-drive-growth

  31. Gas Strategies (2018) Drawn-out ball game: Asian spot LNG prices to stay below long-term contract prices. Retrieved from: http://www.gasstrategies.com/blogs/drawn-out-ball-game-asian-spot-lng-prices-stay-below-long-term-contract-prices

  32. GECF (2017) Global Gas Outlook 2017, Gas Exporting Countries Forum Secretariat, Doha, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  33. GIIGNL (2018) The LNG industry, GIIGNL annual report 2018

    Google Scholar 

  34. GIIGNL (2017) The LNG industry, GIIGNL annual report 2017

    Google Scholar 

  35. GIIGNL (2016) The LNG industry, GIIGNL annual report 2016

    Google Scholar 

  36. GIIGNL (2014) The LNG industry, GIIGNL annual report 2014

    Google Scholar 

  37. GIIGNL (2013) The LNG industry, GIIGNL annual report 2013

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gomes I (2015) Natural gas in Canada: what are the options going forward? Available at http://www.oxfordenergy.org

  39. Gyetvay M, Nazarov A (2018) A Major New Player: Expanding Our Global LNG Footprint from 2018 to 2030, Sberbank CIB - “Russia: The Inside Track” Conference Moscow, 22–23 May 2018 Available at: http://www.novatek.ru/common/upload/doc/IR_May%202018.pdfwww.novatek.ru/common/upload/doc/IR_May2018.pdf

  40. Hafner M, Tagliapietra S (2013) The Globalization of natural gas markets: new challenges and opportunities for Europe (Claeys & Casteels)

    Google Scholar 

  41. HalmØ TM (2016) The gas value chain; Compendium PET 545. University of Stavanger

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hashimoto H (2017) Japan’s pursuit of its own LNG hub, IEEJ: May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hydrogen Council (2017) Hydrogen scaling up, a sustainable pathway for the global energy transition, Nov 2017

    Google Scholar 

  44. IEA (2011) Are we entering a golden age of gas?. World Energy Outlook Special Report, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  45. IEA (2012) Golden rules for a golden age of gas: world energy outlook special report on unconventional gas, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  46. IEA (2018) Global Gas Security Review 2018, Meeting Challenges in a Fast Changing Market, October 2018

    Google Scholar 

  47. IGU (2018a) 2018 World LNG report

    Google Scholar 

  48. IGU (2018b) Wholesale Gas Price Survey 2018 Edition, A Global Review of Price Formation Mechanisms, June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  49. IGU (2017) 2017 World LNG report

    Google Scholar 

  50. IGU (2016) 2016 World LNG report

    Google Scholar 

  51. IGU (2015) 2015 World LNG report

    Google Scholar 

  52. IGU (2014) 2014 World LNG report

    Google Scholar 

  53. IGU (2013) 2013 World LNG report

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jensen JT (2004) The development of a global LNG market, NG 5, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES)

    Google Scholar 

  55. KPMG (2014) Singapore as an LNG hub: Understanding challenges and identifying opportunities in 2014. Global Energy Institute

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kuang M (2018) The Future of LNG, Published 24 Apr 2018. Available at: https://knect365.com/energy/article/fbf9dac2-0983-4752-ad4a-da3bca0ffc60/the-future-of-lng-in-asia

  57. Langfeldt L (2018) Maritime Fuel Cell Applications Technologies and ongoing developments, DNV GL, February 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.jterc.or.jp/koku/koku_semina/pdf/180221_presentation-01.pdf

  58. Laurent A (2018) Global energy mix, natural gas and shale gas as a game changer? 8th Global Commodities Forum, UNCTAD, 23–24 Apr 2018, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  59. Le Fevre C (2018) A review of demand prospects for LNG as a marine transport fuel. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, OIES PAPER: NG 133. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/A-review-of-demand-prospects-for-LNG-as-a-marine-fuel-NG-133.pdf

  60. Le MT (2017) Le rôle des gaz conventionnels et nonconventionnels dans la transition énergétique en Asie. Economies et finances. Université Grenoble Alpes, 2017. Français <NNT: 2017GREAE007>

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lo K (2017) Asian Energy Challenges in the Asian Century. J Asian Energy Stud 1: 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24112/jaes.010101. Available at: https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/jaes/vol1/iss1/1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Louis Dreyfus Armateurs (2010) Shipping in 50 Lessons

    Google Scholar 

  63. MAN (2013) Propulsion trends in LNG carriers. MAN Diesel & Turbo, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  64. Manish V (2017) Resetting China’s energy security goals

    Google Scholar 

  65. McKinsey (2018) Decarbonization of industrial sectors: the next frontier, June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  66. Medlock III KB (2014) Natural gas price in Asia: what to expect, center for energy studies. James A Baker III Institute for Public Policy

    Google Scholar 

  67. Merison F (2016) Globalisation of the gas market: it has been going on longer than you think. Available at: https://www.energypost.eu/globalisation-gas-market-going-longer-think/

  68. METI (2016) Strategy for LNG market development, creating flexible LNG market and developing an LNG Trading Hub in Japan, 2 May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  69. METI (2017) Basic hydrogen strategy, 26 Dec 2017

    Google Scholar 

  70. Mills MP (2018) The real fuel of the future: natural gas. Manhattan Institute, Sept 2018

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mitsui OSK Lines (2018) LNG transportation from the Arctic Ocean: Yamal LNG Project, June 2018, Yoshikazu Kawagoe

    Google Scholar 

  72. Montosa M (2017) China’s energy security strategies analysis. Eurasia Review, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nagashima N (2018) Japan’s Hydrogen strategy and its economic and geopolitical. Etudes de l’Ifri, Oct 2018

    Google Scholar 

  74. Paik KW (2018) South Korea’s energy policy change and the implications for its LNG imports, June 2018, NG 132

    Google Scholar 

  75. Palti Guzman L et al (2016) Asia’s energy security amid global market change, NBR special report No 63, Dec 2016

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pedersen C (2017), LNG prices & pricing mechanisms.. S&P Global Platts, Feb 2017

    Google Scholar 

  77. Petrostrategies (2018) No.1550, Vol 33, June 11, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  78. Petrostrategies (2018) No.1560, Vol 33, Sept 17, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  79. Petrostrategies (2018) No. 1566, Vol 33, Oct 29, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  80. Prowse N, Cygan Jones P (2016) LNG market obstacles or opportunities? Aug 2016. LNG Industry

    Google Scholar 

  81. PwC (2017) Small going big: why smallscale LNG may be the next big wave. Strategy&, PwC

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ramos J (2017) Fossil Fuel Pros And Cons, Science Trends, Published December 18, 2017. Available at: https://sciencetrends.com/fossil-fuel-pros-cons-true-advantage-oil-gas/

  83. Raval (2017) South Korea’s energy shift targets increased LNG supply, The Financial Times, July 10, 2017. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/fb27d9a4-6547-11e7-9a66-93fb352ba1fe

  84. Raza M, Ather Elahi M (2014) Globalisation, energy usage and sustainability, MPRA Paper No. 59323

    Google Scholar 

  85. Rogers HV, Stern J (2014) Challenges to JCC pricing in Asian LNG markets. Available at http://www.oxfordenergy.org

  86. Ross C, Varghese J (2018) LNG projects have stalled. A new business model could help. www.forbes.com/sites/uhenergy/2018/05/14/lngprojectshavestalledanewbusinessmodelcouldhelp

  87. Sakmar SL (2013) Energy for the 21st century, opportunities and challenges for liquefied natural gas (LNG). Edward Elgar Pub. Ltd, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  88. Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJ, Mahalik MK (2017) Is globalization detrimental to CO2 emissions in Japan? New threshold analysis, environmental modelling and assessment, Oct 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Shoemaker JKD et al (2013) Climate change. What role for shortlived climate pollutants in mitigation policy? Sci 342:1323–1324. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240162Medline

  90. Statoil (2015) Presentation for spring semester 2015, University of Stavanger

    Google Scholar 

  91. Stern J (ed) (2012) The pricing of internationally traded natural gas, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  92. Stern J (2017) Can demand for imported LNG in Asia increase because It is a ‘cleaner energy source? IEEJ, Special Issue, Oct 2017

    Google Scholar 

  93. Stern JP, Rogers HV (2014) The dynamics of a liberalised European gas market: key determinants of hub prices, and roles and risks of major players. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Suisheng Z (2008) China’s global search for energy security: cooperation and competition in Asia-Pacific. J Contemp China 17(55):207227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560701809460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. UNCTAD (2018) Commodities at a glance. Special issue on shale gas

    Google Scholar 

  96. Verians D (2015) Communidad GNLM Small Scale LNG, 11 Nov 2015, Engie

    Google Scholar 

  97. Vivoda V (2014) LNG import diversification in Asia. Energy Strategy Rev 2(3–4):289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Williamson A (2018) Changes in Dynamics and Pricing of LNG in the Atlantic Basin, OMV Gas & Power, Vienna, 29 January 2018. Available at: http://www.wraconferences.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/1025-Andy-Williamson-OMV-Gas-Marketing-Trading.pdf

  99. Yafimava K (2014) Outlook for the Long Term Contracts in a Globalizing Market (focus on Europe), 5th Gas Centre Industry Forum, UNECE, Geneva, 19 January 2014. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pp/geg/gif5_19Jan2015/s1_1_Yafimava.pdf

  100. Yergin D (2009) Energy, growth and globalization. First Mag 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  101. Yergin D (2011) The quest: energy, security and the remaking of the modern world. Penguin Books Limited

    Google Scholar 

  102. Yu K (2018) Asia gas hub: To be or not to be? Singapore SIEW Think tank Roundtable, 1 Nov 2018. https://www.siew.sg/docs/defaultsource/Slides/2018/142018ttrcdrkahoyu.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofiane Oudjida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix 1

Characteristics of Asia-Pacific LNG price indexes

Index

Japan/METI

JKM

RIM Japan

ANAE

EAX

SLInG

Publisher

METI

Platts

RIM Intelligence

Argus Media

ICS

SGX and EMC

Start of stats

Mar. 2014

Feb. 2009

Feb. 2016

2012

Jan. 2014

Sept. 2014

Ship (Cargo) size

Any

2.9–3.7 Bcf

2.9 Bcf tankers & partial cargoes

2.9–3.3 Bcf and partial cargoes normalized

0.6–5.6 Bcf & partial volumes

2.9–3.7 Bcf

Index coverage area

LNG delivered to Japan

Spot physical cargoes delivered into Japan and South Korea

Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China

Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, China

Physical cargoes to Japan, South Korea, Taiwan & China

Vessels on the water with potential to deliver to Singapore

Assessment type

Census sent from METI to market players

Daily phone or electronic survey of market players

Trading info from OTC market; Price assessment from JOE LNG market deals & bids/offers

Daily phone or electronic survey of market participants

Daily phone or electronic survey of bids, offer (first-hand or observed)

Survey of select market participants

Assessment frequency

Monthly price sa segments

Daily, with market close prices

Assessed & published daily

Assessed & published daily

Assessed & published daily

Half-monthly assessments, published twice weekly

Sale or delivery

DES contracted and arrival

DES

DES

DES

DES

FOB

Assessment forward range

Any forward period for LNG delivery (contract-based); within-month (arrival-baaed)

Prompt delivery; 3rd & 4th or 4th & 5th half-month forward

Half-monthly assessments for the 3rd–5th half- months forward

Prompt delivery; 2nd–5th half- months forward

3rd–6th half-months out

3rd–6th half-months out

Index calculated

Contract-based (for deals made in-month) and arrival based (for cargoes arriving that month)

Prompt or deferred spot prices averaged for assessed half-months

Monthly average price for half-months calculated daily

Physical and forward swap are assessed daily for forward half-months

Daily front and second month ahead prices for all countries averaged

Half-monthly prices are averaged for the first full month

Types of trades included

Spot LNG to be delivered

Spot LNG to be delivered

Deals done and bids/offers on LNG cargoes

Spot LNG to be delivered in 6–12 weeks

Global prompt & mid-term charter LNG

Spot LNG able to be shipped to Singapore

Number of contributors

−15

Not specified in Methodology

Not specified in Methodology

Not specified in Methodology

Varies daily; no minimum data threshold

50

Contributor requirements

Companies/ consumers of spot LNG

Any market participant; buy/ sell prices must pass the “repeatability” test

None; market prices assessed from OTIC market trading information

All credible mark market sources, market participants and brokers/trading platforms

Active or past LNG industry participants, not only the physical market

Active in the physical LNG market

Data cleaning

N/A

Data aligned with standard assessment specifications

Higher bids & lower offers are prioritized as closer to market values

Market condition adjustments if assessment hierarchy would skew results

Data verified with trading counterparty technical-purpose cargoes excluded

Top 15% and bottom 15% removed as outliers

  1. Source US EIA [23]. Perspectives on the Development of LNG Market Hubs in the Asia Pacific Region, March 2017, page 45

1.2 Appendix 2

figure h

Note Last Updated December 2018. Source Waterborne Energy, Inc. Data in $US/MMBtu

1.3 Appendix 3

Small-scale LNG Value network, wholesale and retail.

figure i

Source Shell (edited version)

1.4 Appendix 4

Existing and potential future emission control areas and Sulphur Regulations.

figure j

Source Adapted from DNV-GL [15] and Langfeldt [57]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oudjida, S. (2019). Asian Energy and Environmental Challenges in Era of Globalization: The Case of LNG. In: Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre, D. (eds) Energy and Environmental Strategies in the Era of Globalization. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06001-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06001-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06000-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06001-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics