Skip to main content

Seniors’ Acceptance of Virtual Humanoid Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 544))

Abstract

This paper reports on a study conducted as part of the EU EMPATHIC project, whose goal is to develop an empathic virtual coach capable of enhancing seniors’ well-being, focusing on user requirements and expectations with respect to participants’ age and technology experiences (i.e. participants’ familiarity with technological devices such as smartphones, laptops, and tablets). The data shows that seniors’ favorite technological device is the smartphone, and this device was also the one that scored the highest in terms of easiness to use. We found statistically significant differences on the preferences expressed by seniors toward the gender of the agents. Seniors (independently from their gender) prefer to interact with female humanoid agents on both the pragmatic and hedonic dimensions of an interactive system and are more in favor to commit themselves in a long-lasting interaction with them. In addition, we found statistically significant effects of the seniors’ technology savviness on the hedonic qualities of the proposed interactive systems. Seniors with technological experience felt less motivated and judged the proposed agents less captivating, exciting, and appealing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Theng Y-L, Paye A (2011) Interactive digital social activity space for the elderly and positive ageing. Designing with and for the elderly: an interactive digital social activity space addressing elderly loneliness and IADIS, Society and Human Beings

    Google Scholar 

  2. Munoz RF, Cuijpers P, Smit F, Barrera AZ, Leykin Y (2010) Prevention of major depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 6:181–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McDaid D, Curran C, Knapp M (2005) Promoting mental well-being in the workplace: a European policy perspective. Int Rev Psychiatry 17(5):365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hawley MS, Cunningham SP, Green PD, Enderby P, Palmer R, Sehgal S, O’Neill P (2013) A voice-input voice-output communication aid for people with severe speech impairment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 21(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parker SG, Hawley MS (2013) Telecare for an ageing population? Age Ageing 42(4):424–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prescott TJ, Epton T, Evers V, McKee K, Hawley M, Webb T, Benyon D, Conran S, Strand R, Buning M, Verschure P, Dario P, Group T (2012) Robot companions for citizens: roadmapping the potential for future robots in empowering older people. In: Bridging research in ageing and ICT development final conference, Springer-Verlag, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gallego-Perez J, Lohse M, Evers V (2013) Robots to motivate elderly people: present and future challenges. In: Proceedings of IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 685–690

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giuliani MV, Scopelliti M, Fornara F (2005) Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities. In: Robot and human interactive communication. ROMAN 2005 IEEE international workshop, Nashville, TN, USA, 13–15 August

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esposito A, Schlögl S, Amorese T, Esposito AM, Torres MI, Masucci F, Cordasco G (2018) Seniors’ sensing of agent’s personality from facial expressions. In: Proceedings of ICCHP, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gong L, Nass C (2007) When a talking-face computer agent is half-human and half-humanoid: human identity and consistency preference. Hum Commun Res 33(2):163–193

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sträfling N, Fleischer I, Polzer C, Leutner D, Krämer NC (2010) Teaching learning strategies with a pedagogical agent: the effects of a virtual tutor and its appearance on learning and motivation. J Media Psychol: Theor, Methods, Appl 22(2):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ring L, Utami D, Bickmore T (2014) The right agent for the job? The effects of agent visual appearance on task domain. In: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent virtual agents (IVA 2014). LNCS, 8637. Springer International Publishing, pp 374–384

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guadagno RE, Blascovich J, Bailenson JN, Mccall C (2007) Virtual humans and persuasion: the effects of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychol 10(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kong H (2013) Face interface will empower employee. IJACT 5(15):193–199

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oh SY, Bailenson J, Krämer N, Li B (2016) Let the avatar brighten your smile: effects of enhancing facial expressions in virtual environments. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0161794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cordasco G, Esposito M, Masucci F, Riviello MT, Esposito A, Chollet G, Schlögl S, Milhorat P, Pelosi G (2014) Assessing voice user interfaces: the vAssist system prototype. In: Proceedings of 5th IEEE international conference on cognitive infocommunications, pp 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yaghoubzadeh R, Kramer M, Pitsch K, Kopp S (2013) Virtual agents as daily assistants for elderly or cognitively impaired people. In: Proceedings of international workshop on intelligent virtual agents (IVA 2013). LNCS, 8108. Springer International Publishing, pp 79–91

    Google Scholar 

  19. Straßmann C, Krämer NC (2017) A categorization of virtual agent appearances and a qualitative study on age-related user preferences. In: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent virtual agents (IVA 2017). LNCS, 10498. Springer International Publishing, pp 413–422

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hassenzahl M (2014) AttrakDiff(tm). Internet resource http://www.attrakdiff.de

  21. Hassenzahl M (2004) The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum-Comput Interact 19:319–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Signorelli A (2011) Antropologia culturale, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Milano, pp 209–213

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cereghetti DM, Kleanthous S, Christophorou C, Tsiourti C, Wings C, Christodoulou E (2015) Virtual partners for seniors: analysis of the users’ preferences and expectations on personality and appearance. In: CEUR workshop proceedings, vol 1528, pp 7–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to the results presented in this paper has been conducted in the project EMPATHIC (Grant N: 769872) that received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gennaro Cordasco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Esposito, A. et al. (2019). Seniors’ Acceptance of Virtual Humanoid Agents. In: Leone, A., Caroppo, A., Rescio, G., Diraco, G., Siciliano, P. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05920-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05921-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics