Skip to main content

Upper Limbs Orthosis for Disability Support: The Areas of Project Development Between Technology and Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Assisted Living (ForItAAL 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 544))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 715 Accesses

Abstract

The ISO 9999: 2016 standard synthetically defines the two different types of artificial support necessary to support or replace the functions of a part of the body, they are indicated as devices applied to the body to support neuromusculoskeletal or movement related functions: the orthosis. They are also referred to as devices applied to the body to replace anatomical structures: prosthesis. The scientific scenario in this field is extremely articulated and invests across many sectors and skills, where the relationship and collaboration systems are substantial for the complexity of the objectives to be achieved. The aid entrusted to a technologically sophisticated system, which represents a substantial functional appendix of the body, implies, for the development of innovation, not only a profound knowledge of the medical, engineering and computer aspects, but also ergonomic, formal, communicative and aesthetic. The project, or the projects that are intended to be presented in the present research work, underline, with the presentation of two case studies, the levels of in-depth analysis of the issues related to the role of design and information technology and robotics. In the following sections two cases of research projects carried out in parallel are proposed. The first “Talking Hands”, purely technical and technological, is a completely wearable device for sign language translation. The second “D’Aria” is a glove is aimed at people with rheumatoid arthritis both for the initial stages of the disease (prevention of more serious damage) and for the more advanced phases (a real aid that restores lost grip capacity). Finally, as a research perspective, this article proposes the hybridization of the two case studies. The final objective will therefore be to create an experimental prototype that hybridizes the two characteristics, creating a series of tests on patients affected by these diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Urry J (2000) Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first century. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufmann V, Bergman MM, Joye D (2004) Motility: mobility as capital. Int J Urban RegNal Res 28:745–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Urry J (2007) Mobilities. Polity, p 336

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sheller M (2011) Cosmopolitanism and mobilities. In: Nowicka M, Rovisco M (eds) The Ashgate research companion to cosmopolitanism. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 561–589

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aday P (2010) Aerial life: spaces, mobilities affects. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  6. Markula P (2014) The moving body and social change. Cult Stud Crit Methodol 14:483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Newman JI, Giardina MD (2014) Moving biopolitics. Cult Stud Crit Methodol 14(5):419–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708614542409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Metz DH (2000) Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transp Policy 7(2):149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith J, Borchelt M, Maier H, Jopp D (2002) Health and well–being in the young old and oldest old. J Soc Issues 58:715–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mollenkopf H, Kaspar R, Marcellini F, Ruoppila I (2004a) Quality of life in urban and rural areas of five European countries: similarities and differences. Hallym Int J Aging 6:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mollenkopf H, Marcellini F, Ruoppila I, Széman Z, Tacken M, Wahl HW (2004b) Social and behavioural science perspectives on out-of-home mobility in later life: findings from the European project MOBILATE. Eur J Ageing 1(1):45–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Allen J (2008) Older people and wellbeing. Institute for Public Policy Research, London. http://www.ippr.org/publicationsandreports/publication.asp?id=620. Accessed 29 March 2010

  13. Wasserman D (2012) Ethics of human enhancement and its relevance to disability rights. Encyclopedia of the life sciences

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bose D (2014). Defining and analyzing disability in human enhancement. In: Global issues and ethical considerations in human enhancement technologies. IGI Global

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eilers M, Grüber K, Rehmann-Sutter C (eds) (2014) The human enhancement debate and disability. New bodies for a better life. Palgrave MacMillan

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wolbring G (2009) What next for the human species? Human performance enhancement, ableism and pluralism. Dev Dialogue 2

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tomas D (1995) Feedback and cybernetics: reimaging the body in the age of the cyborg. Body Soc 1(3–4)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Swart L, Watermeyer B (2008) Cyborg anxiety: Oscar pistorius and the boundaries of what it means to be human. J Disabil Soc 23(2)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morrone A (2004) “Materiali e protesi” articolo su rivista Diid n°08/2004 Dpress Roma

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pezzuoli1 F, Corona1 D, Corradini1 ML, Cristofaro1 A (2019) Development of a wearable device for sign language translation, School of Science and Technology, Unicam, Via Madonna delle Carceri 9, Camerino, Italy

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Paciotti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Paciotti, D., Pezzuoli, F., Cotechini, F. (2019). Upper Limbs Orthosis for Disability Support: The Areas of Project Development Between Technology and Design. In: Leone, A., Caroppo, A., Rescio, G., Diraco, G., Siciliano, P. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05920-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05921-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics