Advertisement

Flipping the Paradigm: Studying Up and Research for Social Justice

  • Elena AydarovaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Social justice research most often focuses on the voices, experiences, and practices of underserved and marginalized groups. While this focus produces important insights, it disregards the actions of those in power who create and maintain systems of inequality and injustice in the first place. To address this gap, this chapter examines methodological approaches for studying up or researching the powerful. It describes the challenges faced by researchers who study those in power, such as problems of access, interview pitfalls, dangers in data analysis and interpretation, ethical concerns, and dissemination of findings. The chapter also provides suggestions for how researchers can address those challenges. The significance of this chapter lies in a systematic presentation of methodological tools necessary for studying the powerful in research for social justice.

References

  1. Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 673–676.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1981.11075236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aydarova, E. (in press). Jokers and fools in the public square: Ethnography in the age of spectacle.Google Scholar
  4. Aydarova, E. (forthcoming). Teacher education reform as political theater: Russian policy dramas. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ayers, W., Quinn, T. M., & Stovall, D. (2009). Handbook of social justice in education. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baez, B. (2002). Confidentiality in qualitative research: Reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 35–58.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 679–682.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boucher, A. (2017). Power in elite interviewing: Lessons from feminist studies for political science. Women’s Studies International Forum, 62, 99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (2000). For a scholarship with commitment. In Profession (pp. 40–45). New York, NY: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
  10. Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Briggs, C. L. (2003). Interviewing, power/knowledge, and social inequality. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Postmodern interviewing (pp. 242–255). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Demerath, P. (2009). Producing success: The culture of personal advancement in an American high school. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (Eds.). (2018). Qualitative inquiry in the public sphere. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Duke, K. (2002). Getting beyond the “official line:” Reflections on dilemmas of access, knowledge and power in researching policy networks. Journal of Social Policy, 31(1), 39–59.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279402006505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farquharson, K. (2005). A different kind of snowball: Identifying key policymakers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(4), 345–353.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557042000203116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferguson, A. A. (2010). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fitz, J., Halpin, D., & Power, S. (1994, April). Brief encounters: Researching education policy making in elite settings. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  20. Gewirtz, S., & Ozga, J. (1994). Interviewing the education policy elite. In G. Walford (Ed.), Researching the powerful in education (pp. 186–203). London, UK: University College London Press.Google Scholar
  21. Griffiths, M. (1998). Educational research for social justice: Getting off the fence. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunter, A. (1995). Local knowledge and local power: Notes on the ethnography of local community elites. In R. Hertz & J. B. Imber (Eds.), Studying elites using qualitative methods (pp. 151–170). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kezar, A. (2003). Transformational elite interviews: Principles and problems. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 395–415.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403009003005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lancaster, K. (2017). Confidentiality, anonymity and power relations in elite interviewing: Conducting qualitative policy research in a politicised domain. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 93–103.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1123555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Leech, B. L. (2002). Asking questions: Techniques for semistructured interviews. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 665–668.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee-Treweek, G., & Linkogle, S. (2000). Putting danger in the frame. In G. Lee-Treweek & S. Linkogle (Eds.), Danger in the field: Ethics and risk in social research (pp. 8–25). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. MacLeod, J. (2008). Ain’t no makin’it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Mikecz, R. (2012). Interviewing elites: Addressing methodological issues. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 482–493.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412442818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nader, L. (1972). Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Reinventing anthropology (pp. 284–311). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  34. Ostrander, S. (1995). “Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful.” Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. In R. Hertz & J. B. Imber (Eds.), Studying elites using qualitative methods (pp. 133–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips, R. (1998). The politics of history: Some methodological and ethical dilemmas in élite-based research. British Educational Research Journal, 24(1), 5–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192980240102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Priyadharshini, E. (2003). Coming unstuck: Thinking otherwise about “studying up”. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 34(4), 420–437.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2003.34.4.420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Selwyn, N. (2013). Researching the once-powerful in education: The value of retrospective elite interviewing in education policy research. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 339–352.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.728630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, K. E. (2006). Problematising power relations in ‘elite’ interviews. Geoforum, 37(4), 643–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–316). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stephens, N. (2007). Collecting data from elites and ultra-elites: Telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 203–216.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107076020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Straubhaar, R. (2015). The methodological benefits of social media: “Studying up” in Brazil in the Facebook age. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(9), 1081–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2015.1074750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thuesen, F. (2011). Navigating between dialogue and confrontation: Phronesis and emotions in interviewing elites on ethnic discrimination. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(7), 613–622.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411413998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tompkins-Stange, M. E. (2016). Policy patrons: Philanthropy, education reform, and the politics of influence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  44. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  45. Walford, G. (2012). Researching the powerful in education: A re-assessment of the problems. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35(2), 111–118.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.669523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Welch, C., Marschan-Piekkari, R., Penttinen, H., & Tahvanainen, M. (2002). Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research. International Business Review, 11(5), 611–628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00039-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations