How Much Do You Suffer? The Performativity of Scientific Scales of Work-Related Suffering

  • Florence Allard-PoesiEmail author
  • Sandrine Hollet-Haudebert


Based on a Foucauldian conception of knowledge, this research analyzes seven scales for measuring work-related suffering; scales commonly used in surveys conducted in organizations, and which perform a certain conception of the suffering subject and his/her environment. This analysis shows that these instruments construct the individual as a reflexive subject, as someone capable of accounting for his state and environment; but that, first of all individuals are not envisaged as actors in this environment and second of all, that the latter is limited to the immediate working environment. Consequently, the strategic, economic, sociological, or ideological dimensions of this environment cannot be questioned. In this regard, our study suggests that research should be conducted on the so far neglected question of the limitations of those measuring instruments in terms of action and reflection.


  1. Allard-Poesi, F., & Hollet-Haudebert, S. (2017). The sound of silence: Measuring suffering at work. Human Relations, 70(12), 1442–1463. Scholar
  2. Beehr, T. A., & Newman, J. E. (1978). Job stress, employee health, and organizational effectiveness: A facet analysis, model, and literature review. Personnel Psychology, 31(4), 665–699. Scholar
  3. Bellinghausen, L., Collange, J., Botella, M., Emery, J. L., & Albert, E. (2009). Validation factorielle de l’échelle française de stress perçu en milieu professionnel. Santé Publique, 4(21), 365–373. Scholar
  4. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermerlstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. Scholar
  5. Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Duncan, P. (2007). Critical perspectives on health. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343. Scholar
  8. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A sociology of quantification. Archives of European Sociology, 49(3), 401–436. Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1969). L’Archéologie du Savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et Punir. Naissance de la Prison. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la Sexualité I. La Volonté de Savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1984). What is Enlightenment? In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 32–50). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. 2). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1991). Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France. 1978–1979. Paris: Gallimard, Seuil; English edition: The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 291–309. Scholar
  17. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of the grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  18. Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9(1), 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg, J. (2004). Stress fairness to fare no stress: Managing workplace stress by promoting organizational justice. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 352–365. Scholar
  20. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. Scholar
  21. Knights, D., & Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations and the subject: A critique. Organization Studies, 12(2), 251–273. Scholar
  22. Knights, D., & Morgan, G. (1995). Strategic management, financial services and information technology. Journal of Management Studies, 32(2), 191–214. Scholar
  23. Lemyre, L., & Tessier, R. (1988). Mesure du stress psychologique (MSP): Se sentir stressée. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 20(3), 302–321. Scholar
  24. Lilley, S. (2001). The language of strategy. In R. Westwood & S. Linstead (Eds.), The language of organization (pp. 68–88). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113. Scholar
  26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nichols, T. (1999). Death and injury at work: A sociological perspective. In N. Daykin & L. Doyal (Eds.), Health and work: Critical perspectives (pp. 86–106). London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  29. Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Payne, S. (1999). Paid and unpaid work in mental health: Towards a new perspective. In D. L. Loyal (Ed.), Health and work: Critical perspectives (pp. 35–53). London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pezet, É. (2007). Introduction. In É. Pezet (Ed.), Management et conduite de soi: Enquête sur les ascèses de la performance (pp. 3–13). Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
  32. Poisson, J. (2008). Rapport sur la pénibilité au travail. Accessed June 25, 2018.
  33. Porter, T. M. (1992). Objectivity as standardization: The rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics and cost-benefit analysis. Annals of Scholarship, 9, 19–59.Google Scholar
  34. Porter, T. M. (1993). Statistics and the politics of objectivity. Revue de synthèse, 4(1), 87–101. Scholar
  35. Porter, T. M. (1996). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shirom, A., & Melamed, S. (2006). A comparison of the construct validity of two burnout measures in two groups of professionals. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 176–200. Scholar
  38. Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 27–41. Scholar
  39. Steffy, B. D., & Jones, J. W. (1988). Workplace stress and indicators of coronary disease risk. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 686–698. Scholar
  40. Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518–545. Scholar
  41. Townley, B. (1995). ‘Know thyself’: Self-awareness, self-formation and managing. Organization, 2(2), 271–289. Scholar
  42. Vatin, F. (2008). L’esprit d’ingénieur: pensée calculatoire et éthique économique. Revue Française de Socio-Économie, 1(1), 131–152. Scholar
  43. Vatin, F., Caillé, A., & Favereau, O. (2010). Réflexions croisées sur la mesure et l’incertitude. Revue Française de Gestion, 203(4), 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verger, P., Aulagnier, M., Schwoebel, V., & Lang, T. (2005). Démarches épidémiologiques après une catastrophe. Anticiper les catastrophes: enjeux de santé publique, connaissances, outils et méthodes. - Réponses Environnement, Ministère de l’Ecologie et du Développement Durable. Paris: La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
  45. Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483. Scholar
  46. Watterson, A. (1999). Why we still have old epidemics and endemics in occupational health: Policy and practice failures and some possible solutions. In N. Daykin & L. Doyal (Eds.), Health and work: Critical perspectives (pp. 107–126). London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florence Allard-Poesi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sandrine Hollet-Haudebert
    • 2
  1. 1.Université Paris-Est, IRG (EA 2354)CréteilFrance
  2. 2.IAE University of ToulonToulonFrance

Personalised recommendations