Multi-path Routing for Mission Critical Applications in Software-Defined Networks

  • Ramon Carreras Ramirez
  • Quoc-Tuan Vien
  • Ramona Trestian
  • Leonardo MostardaEmail author
  • Purav Shah
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 257)


Mission critical applications depends on the communication among other systems and/or users and thus, the traffic/flows generated by these applications could bring profound consequences in sectors such as military, hospital, automotive safety and air-traffic control systems. These critical flows require stringent QoS requirements on parameters such as throughput, packet loss, latency, jitter and redundancy. Network operators must have tools that allow them to provide special treatment to such mission-critical flows based on specific application requirements. Due to the constraints of traditional networks, we should seek for solutions supported by de-centralised approaches offered by SDN.

In this paper, we propose a solution to achieve the stringent QoS requirement of such mission critical flows in multi-path environments based on SDN. This solution allows the network operator to prioritise traffic between specific end points. Also, using the overall view of the network, the solution allows evaluation of the path loads between two endpoints and to opt for the less congested path. Moreover, this paper tries to demonstrate a satisfactory network performance by presenting trade-offs between throughput and the number of hops within a multi-path network. The proposed solution is implemented in the application and control layer of the OpenDaylight Controller. The networking devices were simulated using Mininet simulator and background traffic was generated using Iperf.


  1. 1.
    Dilmaghani, R., Kwon, D.: Evaluation of OpenFlow load balancing for navy. In: 2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 2015, pp. 133–138, October 2015.
  2. 2.
    Hojiev, S.Q., Kim, D.S.: Dynamic load balancing algorithm based on users immigration in wireless LANs. J. Adv. Comput. Netw. 3(2), 114–118 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu, Y., Wang, W., Gong, X., Que, X., Cheng, S.: BalanceFlow: controller load balancing for OpenFlow networks. In: 2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, vol. 02, pp. 780–785, October 2012.
  4. 4.
    Karakus, M., Durresi, A.: Quality of service (QOS) in software defined networking (SDN): a survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 80, 200–218 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liang, C., Kawashima, R., Matsuo, H.: Scalable and crash-tolerant load balancing based on switch migration for multiple open flow controllers. In: 2014 Second International Symposium on Computing and Networking, pp. 171–177, December 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKeown, N., et al.: OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 38(2), 69–74 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verma, D.C.: Simplifying network administration using policy-based management. IEEE Netw. 16(2), 20–26 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou, Y., et al.: A load balancing strategy of SDN controller based on distributed decision. In: 2014 IEEE 13th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, pp. 851–856, September 2014.

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramon Carreras Ramirez
    • 1
  • Quoc-Tuan Vien
    • 1
  • Ramona Trestian
    • 1
  • Leonardo Mostarda
    • 2
    Email author
  • Purav Shah
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Science and TechnologyMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.Scuola di Scienze e TecnologieUniversita’ degli Studi di, CamerinoCamerinoItaly

Personalised recommendations