Skip to main content

Influence of Coke Calcining Level on Anode Real Density, LC and Other Properties Using a Constant Baking Cycle

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Light Metals 2019

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

Real density (RD) and crystallite size (LC) are common measures to control coke calcination levels. They are also measured routinely on anode core samples as a means of tracking anode baking levels. Many anode producers target anode RD levels which are at least 0.02 g/cm3 higher than the calcined petroleum coke (CPC) RD to minimize differential reactivity between the CPC and binder derived carbon. Depending on the calcining process parameters and technology, coke RD and LC can vary significantly. Shaft CPC often shows a higher RD and LC than rotary kiln CPC due to the longer residence times. Coke blends with CPC having different RD and LC values are now regularly used by aluminum smelters. This paper reports on the results of pilot anode studies to evaluate the impact of the starting CPC RD and LC on final anode RD, LC and other properties such as specific electrical resistivity and carboxy reactivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. L. Edwards (2014) The History and Future Challenges of Calcined Petroleum Coke Production and Use in Aluminium Smelting. JOM 67 (2): 308–321.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISO 17499 (2006) Carbonaceous Materials Used in the Production of Aluminium—Determination of Baking Level Expressed by Equivalent Temperature.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Rørvik, L. P. Lossius, A. P. Ratvik (2011) Determination of Coke Calcination Level and Anode Baking Level-Application and Reproducibility of L-Sub-C Based Methods. Light Metals: 841–846.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Dreyer (1989), Anode Reactivity Influence of the Baking Process, Light Metals: 478–485.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L.P. Lossius, M. Lubin, L. Edwards, J. Wyss (2013) Relationship between Coke Properties and Anode Properties-Round Robin 19. Light Metals: 1183–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Urs Bühler, Raymond Perruchoud (1995) Dynamic Process Optimization. In: Anodes for the Aluminium Industry, R&D Carbon Ltd. Publication: 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Boenigk, C. Boltersdorf, C. Kuhnt, J. Stiegert, Les Edwards, Marvin Lubin (2015) Pilot Anode Testing of Alternative Binder and CPC Raw Materials. Light Metals: 1033–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Lhuissier, L. Bezamanifary, M. Gendre, M. Chollier (2009) Use of Under-Calcined Coke for the Production of Low-Reactivity Anodes. Light Metals: 979–983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. J. Chollier-Brym, A. Gagnon, C. Boulanger, D. Lepage, G. Savard, G. Bouchard, C. Lagacé, A. Charette (2009) Anode Reactivity: Effect of Coke Calcination Level. Light Metals: 905–908.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Kuhnt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kuhnt, C., Edwards, L., Lubin, M., Harp, K. (2019). Influence of Coke Calcining Level on Anode Real Density, LC and Other Properties Using a Constant Baking Cycle. In: Chesonis, C. (eds) Light Metals 2019. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05864-7_157

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics