Skip to main content

Accelerating Bauxite Residue Remediation with Microbial Biotechnology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Light Metals 2019

Abstract

Biological neutralisation of pH, driven by the microbial fermentation of added organic carbon substrates such as glucose, has recently emerged as a promising technique for remediation of bauxite residue , dropping pH from >11 to <8 in five days. Here, we report on a glasshouse experiment combining this novel microbially-driven pH neutralisation technology with other existing (abiotic) remediation approaches, including addition of gypsum, sewage sludge , and irrigation. Scaling up the bioremediation treatment by three orders of magnitude from previous laboratory trials to these glasshouse trials was successful. Adding bioremediated residue (5 cm thick) at the residue surface significantly enhanced pH neutralisation to depth, decreasing pH from 13 to ~10 as far as 25 cm below the residue surface. Increasing irrigation and tillage frequency accelerated salt removal. Combining our microbial bioneutralisation treatment with fortnightly tillage and daily irrigation provided the best opportunity to rapidly decrease pH and salinity , and is currently being trialled at field scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Courtney RG, Jordan SN, Harrington T (2009) Physico-chemical changes in bauxite residue following application of spent mushroom compost and gypsum. Land Degradation and Development, 20, 572–581.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eastham J, Morald T, Aylmore P (2006) Effective nutrient sources for plant growth on bauxite residue. I. Comparing organic and inorganic fertilisers. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 176, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fuller RD, Nelson EDP, Richardson CJ (1982) Reclamation of red mud (bauxite residues) using alkaline-tolerant grasses with organic amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality, 11, 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graefe M, Klauber C (2011) Bauxite residue issues. IV. Old obstacles and new pathways for in situ residue bioremediation. Hydrometallurgy, 108, 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Power G, Gräfe M, Klauber C (2011) Bauxite residue issues: I. Current management, disposal and storage practices. Hydrometallurgy, 108, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Santini, T.C., Banning, N.C. (2016) Alkaline tailings as novel soil-forming substrates: reframing perspectives on mining and refining wastes. Hydrometallurgy, 164, 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Santini, T.C., Fey, M.V. (2016) Assessment of Technosol formation and in situ remediation in capped alkaline tailings. Catena, 136, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Santini, T.C., Fey, M.V., Smirk, M.N. (2013) Evaluation of soil analytical methods for the characterisation of alkaline Technosols: I. Moisture content, pH, and electrical conductivity. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 13, 1141–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Santini, T.C., Kerr, J.L., Warren, L.A. (2015a) Microbially-driven strategies for bioremediation of bauxite residues. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 293, 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Santini, T.C., Malcolm, L.I., Tyson, G.W., Warren, L.A. (2016) pH and organic carbon dose rates control microbially-driven bioremediation efficacy in alkaline bauxite residue. Environmental Science and Technology, 50, 11164–11173.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Santini, T.C., Warren, L.A., Kendra, K.E. (2015b) Microbial diversity in engineered haloalkaline environments shaped by shared geochemical drivers observed in natural analogues. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 81, 5026–5036.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wong JWC, Ho G (1994) Sewage sludge as organic ameliorant for revegetation of fine bauxite refining residue. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 11, 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wong JWC, Ho GE (1991) Effects of gypsum and sewage sludge amendment on physical properties of fine bauxite refining residue. Soil Science, 152, 326–332.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woodard HJ, Hossner L, Bush J (2008) Ameliorating caustic properties of aluminium extraction residue to establish a vegetative cover. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, 43, 1157–1166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this study from the Australian Government’s Australian Research Council Linkage Projects programme (LP160100207), the International Aluminium Institute, and Alcoa of Australia Limited, and the technical and logistical support of Alcoa of Australia Limited in providing bauxite residue for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. C. Santini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Santini, T.C. et al. (2019). Accelerating Bauxite Residue Remediation with Microbial Biotechnology. In: Chesonis, C. (eds) Light Metals 2019. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05864-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics