Skip to main content

Shear-Punch Testing of Human Cranial Bone and Surrogate Materials

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
TMS 2019 148th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings

Abstract

In recent decades, traumatic brain injury has been at the forefront of public health and military injury research. Improved understanding of skull deformation and fracture are required to advance the development of numerical simulations and surrogate materials aimed at providing critical feedback for future protective equipment design. Numerical simulations of skull fracture require material properties and identification of fracture mechanisms for compressive, tensile, and shear loading; skull–bone failure mechanisms are complex and stress-state dependent. A knowledge gap exists on the mechanical response of human cranial bone subjected to pure shear loading. A shear-punch experimental method was designed to understand the shear response of human skull as a function of through-thickness for cadaveric calvaria specimens. The compliance of the shear-punch system was first tested on a polyurethane foam trabecular bone simulant and a stereolithographic additively manufactured cortical bone surrogate, and their shear strength values were compared to known values of human bone. The sandwich-like structure of human cranial bone consists of dense outer and inner tables separated by a highly porous central diploë layer. Force data obtained from the shear-punch experiments was analyzed as a function of normalized penetration depth to assess the shear strength compared to the microstructure . Preliminary results show 1% offset yield and ultimate shear strengths of human calvaria to be 17.7 ± 4.9 MPa and 25.5 ± 5.1 MPa, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P (1998) Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 20(2):92–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McElhaney JH, Fogle JL, Melvin JW, Haynes RR, Roberts VL, Alem NM (1970) Mechanical properties of cranial bone. J Biomech 3(5):495–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Halawa M, Lee AJC, Ling RSM, Vangala SS (1978) The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 92(1):19–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jepsen KJ, Davy DT, Krzypow DJ (1999) The role of the lamellar interface during torsional yielding of human cortical bone. J Biomech 32(3):303–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirzaali MJ, Schwiedrzik JJ, Thaiwichai S, Best JP, Michler J, Zysset PK, Wolfram U (2016) Mechanical properties of cortical bone and their relationships with age, gender, composition and microindentation properties in the elderly. Bone 93:196–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roydhouse RH (1970) Punch-shear test for dental purposes. J Dent Res 49(1):131–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter JM, Sorensen SE, Johnson RR, Teitelbaum RL, Levine MS (1983) Punch shear testing of extracted vital and endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 16(10):841–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nomoto R, Carrick TE, McCabe JF (2001) Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials. Dent Mater 17(5):415–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bagheri R, Mese A, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2010) Comparison of the effect of storage media on shear punch strength of resin luting cements. J Dent 38(10):820–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lucas GE, Odette GR, Sheckard JW (1986) ASTM STP 888:112–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Toloczko MB, Kurtz RJ, Hasegawa A, Abe K (2002) Shear punch tests performed using a new low compliance test fixture. J Nucl Mater 307:1619–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karthik V, Visweswaran P, Vijayraghavan A, Kasiviswanathan KV, Raj B (2009) Tensile–shear correlations obtained from shear punch test technique using a modified experimental approach. J Nucl Mater 393(3):425–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guduru RK, Darling KA, Kishore R, Scattergood RO, Koch CC, Murty KL (2005) Evaluation of mechanical properties using shear–punch testing. Mater Sci Eng A 395(1–2):307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander SL, Rafaels K, Gunnarsson CA, Weerasooriya T (2017) Morphological characterization of the frontal and parietal bones of the human skull (No. ARL-TR-7962). US Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground United States

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plaisted TA, Gardner JM, Gair JL (2015) Characterization of a composite material to mimic human cranial bone (No. ARL-RP-0552). US Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground United States

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barth HD, Launey ME, MacDowell AA, Ager JW III, Ritchie RO (2010) On the effect of X-ray irradiation on the deformation and fracture behavior of human cortical bone. Bone 46(6):1475–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hankin GL, Toloczko MB, Johnson KI, Khaleel MA, Hamilton ML, Garner FA, Davies RW, Faulkner RG (2000) An investigation into the origin and nature of the slope and X-axis intercept of the shear punch-tensile yield strength correlation using finite element analysis. In: Effects of radiation on materials: 19th international symposium. ASTM International

    Google Scholar 

  18. Motherway JA, Verschueren P, Van der Perre G, Vander Sloten J, Gilchrist MD (2009) The mechanical properties of cranial bone: the effect of loading rate and cranial sampling position. J Biomech 42(13):2129–2135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson L (1985) The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech 18(5):317–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kader MA, Islam MA, Saadatfar M, Hazell PJ, Brown AD, Ahmed S, Escobedo JP (2017) Macro and micro collapse mechanisms of closed-cell aluminium foams during quasi-static compression. Mater Des 118:11–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was sponsored by the Army Research Laboratory and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-18-2-0116. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D. Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brown, A.D., Gunnarsson, C.A., Rafaels, K.A., Alexander, S., Plaisted, T.A., Weerasooriya, T. (2019). Shear-Punch Testing of Human Cranial Bone and Surrogate Materials. In: TMS 2019 148th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05861-6_78

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics