Skip to main content

Stakeholder’s Experiences of the Forensic Child Protection Paradigm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Child Maltreatment ((MALT,volume 9))

Abstract

This chapter, drawing on recent international empirical research, illustrates the perspectives of key stakeholders in the child welfare and protection services: Children, caregivers and practitioners. It shows that while there is an awareness of what children and families require in order to lead supported and healthy lives, the current system is challenged in its attempts to adequately address their needs due to its forensic and highly regulated orientation. Although reforms have been proposed, parallel developments such as mandatory reporting and the imposition of a bureaucratic regulatory framework, have presented obstacles to their establishment. The experiences of children and young people are reported, illustrating their ambivalent view of the services on offer, the way that the system can sometimes compound their negative self-images and the type of supports that they identify as positive. Although the importance of the helping alliance as an effective child protection intervention is well recognised, the chapter shows that caregivers, who include foster carers, experience the current system in ways that are sometimes perceived as unsupportive, unreliable and almost punitive. Finally, the chapter focuses on practitioners in child protection and illustrates that although many workers are highly skilled and resilient, the stability of the workforce is undermined at times by the pressures imposed by the risk-focused nature of the system. The chapter makes the case for a new paradigm, which is well informed, therapeutic and ecological in its orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson, C., Beddoe, L., & Davys, A. (2012). Building resilient practitioners: Definitions and practitioner understandings. British Journal of Social Work, 44(3), 522–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldgate, J., & McIntosh, M. (2006). Looking after the family: A study of children looked after in kinship care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Social Work Inspection Agency Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, J. C., & Cohen, C. S. (2016). “I could not have made it without them”: Examining Trainee Cohort Perspectives on MSW Education for Public Child Welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 10(5), 524–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, J. P. (2014). Pain, normality, and the struggle for congruence: Reinterpreting residential care for children and youth. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. P., Lloyd, E. C., Christ, S. L., Chapman, M. V., & Dickinson, N. S. (2008). Child welfare worker characteristics and job satisfaction: A national study. Social Work, 53(3), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromfield, L., Arney, F., & Higgins, D. (2014). Child protection: Legal grounds for intervening in family life to ensure child safety. In A. Hayes & D. Higgins (Eds.), Families, policy and the law: Selected essays on contemporary issues for Australia (pp. 121–129). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., & Bednar, L. M. (2006). Foster parent perceptions of placement breakdown. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(12), 1497–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, H. (2017). In M. Connolly (Ed.),. Beyond the risk paradigm in child protection Service users as receivers of risk-dominated practice. London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, H., Carr, N., & Whelan, S. (2011a). ‘Like walking on eggshells’: Service user views and expectations of the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 16(1), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, H., Whelan, S., & Carr, N. (2011b). ‘Like waking up in a Franz Kafka novel’: Service users’ experiences of the child protection system when domestic violence and acrimonious separations are involved. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(1), 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S., & Charles, M. (1999). The past, the present, but never the future’: Thematic representations of fostering disruption. Child and Family Social Work, 4, 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. (2017). Social workers and resilience revisited. Practice, 29(2), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M., & Masson, J. (2014). Private and public voices: Does family group conferencing privilege the voice of children and families in child welfare? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36(4), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M., Wojciak, A. S., Farineau, H., & Mullis, A. (2015). The association between perception of relationship with caregivers and behaviours of youth in foster care: A child and caregiver perspective. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(2), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2016). ‘You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you’: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, C., & Coady, N. (2007). Good helping relationships in child welfare: Learning from stories of success. Child & Family Social Work, 12(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J., Greenop, D., & Hills, M. (2016). Participation in child protection: A small-scale qualitative study. Qualitative Social Work, 15(1), 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, J. C., Higgins, D. J., Delfabbro, P., Edwards, B., Vassallo, S., Toumbourou, J. W., & Segal, L. (2017). Economic predictors of child maltreatment in an Australian population-based birth cohort. Children and Youth Services Review, 72, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., & Evans, H. (2004). Children experiencing maltreatment: Who do they turn to? London: NSPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., White, S., & Wastell, D. (2012). Ireland’s opportunity to learn from England’s difficulties? Auditing uncertainty in child protection. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 12(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., Morris, K., & White, S. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J., Bell, C., & Conroy, S. (1995). Operating the child protection system: A study of child protection practices in English local authorities. London: HM Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbertson, R., & Barber, J. (2003). Breakdown of foster care placement: Carer perspectives and system factors. Australian Social Work, 56(4), 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, P. (2016). Social work and child protection in Australia: Whose job is it anyway? Practice, 28(2), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A., Royse, D., Culver, K., Piescher, K., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Who stays, who goes, who knows? A state-wide survey of child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 77, 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, K., Murfield, J., Harland, J. L., & Lord, P. (2006). The voice of young people: An engine for improvement? Scoping the evidence. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, R. M., Dobel-Ober, D., Lawrence, J., Berridge, D., & Sinclair, R. (2003). Who takes care of education? Looked after children’s perceptions of support for educational progress. Child & Family Social Work, 8(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K., & Oltedal, S. (2010). An institutional comparison of child protection systems in Australia and Norway focused on workforce retention. Journal of Social Policy, 39(2), 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L. (2012). Trusting what you’re told: How children learn from others. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K., Harrison, G., Venables, J., & Bosly, F. (2016). Collaborating with families in differential responses: Practitioners’ views. Child & Family Social Work, 21(3), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, D., & Katz, I. (2008). Enhancing service systems for protecting children: Promoting child well-being and child protection reform in Australia. Family Matters, 80, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtan, A. (2008). Family types and social integration in kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 1022–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honey, K. L., Rees, P., & Griffey, S. (2011). Investigating self-perceptions and resilience in Looked After Children. Educational Psychology in Practice, 27(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R., Goldacre, A., Grant, R., & Jones, R. (2016a). Exploring demand and provision in English child protection services. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 923–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R., Grant, R., Jones, R., & Goldacre, A. (2016b). A study of performance indicators and Ofsted ratings in English child protection services. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, A., Fullerton, D., Lohan, M., Dunne, L., & Macdonald, G. (2017). Young people’s views on the impact of care experiences on their ability to form positive intimate relationships. Adoption & Fostering, 41(3), 242–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobe, A., & Gorin, S. (2013). ‘If kids don’t feel safe they don’t do anything’: Young people’s views on seeking and receiving help from Children’s Social Care Services in England. Child & Family Social Work, 18(4), 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, E., & Skoog, V. (2014). The road to placement breakdown: Foster parents’ experiences of the events surrounding the unexpected ending of a child’s placement in their care. Qualitative Social Work, 13(2), 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Kao, D. (2014). A meta-analysis of turnover intention predictors among US child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojan, B. H., & Lonne, B. (2012). A comparison of systems and outcomes for safeguarding children in Australia and Norway. Child & Family Social Work, 17(1), 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathers, S. J. (2006). Placement disruption and negative placement outcomes among adolescents in long-term foster care: The role of behavior problems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(3), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, C. (2007). My life in care: Experiences of non-participation in decision-making processes. Child & Family Social Work, 12(3), 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonne, B. (2013). Reshaping our protective systems: Issues and options. Communities, Children and Families Australia, 7(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonne, B., Parton, N., Thomson, J., & Harries, M. (2009). Reforming child protection. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonne, B., Harries, M., & Lantz, S. (2013). Workforce development: A pathway to reforming child protection systems in Australia. British Journal of Social Work, 43(8), 1630–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen, A.-M., & Skivenes, M. (2015). The child’s opinion and position in care Order proceedings. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23(4), 705–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannay, D., Evans, R., Staples, E., Hallett, S., Roberts, L., Rees, A., & Andrews, D. (2017). The consequences of being labelled ‘looked-after’: Exploring the educational experiences of looked-after children and young people in Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 683–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, F. T. (2016). What is important to looked-after young people during adolescence? A qualitatively driven photo-elicitation study. Leeds: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (2014). In J. Korbin & D. Krugman (Eds.),. Handbook of child maltreatment Strong Communities for Children: A community-wide approach to prevention of child maltreatment (pp. 329–339). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T., McArthur, M., Death, J., Roche, S., & Tilbury, C. (2016). Safe and sound: Exploring the safety of young people in residential care (1925289990). Melbourne: Institute of Child Protection Studies, Australian Catholic University. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Sydney. Retrieved from https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/file-list/Research%20Report%20-%20Safe%20and%20Sound%20Exploring%20the%20safety%20of%20young%20people%20in%20residential%20care%20-%20Causes.pdf

  • Moore, T., McArthur, M., Death, J., Tilbury, C., & Roche, S. (2017). Young people’s views on safety and preventing abuse and harm in residential care:“It’s got to be better than home”. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 212–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R., & Shepherd, M. (2015). Exploring factors contributing to the outcomes of Looked After Children. Communicare, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, M. (2009). Broken circles to a different identity: An exploration of identity for children in out–of-home care in Queensland, Australia. Child & Family Social Work, 14(3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2001). Empowering looked-after children. Child and Family Social Work, 6(2), 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oke, N., Rostill-Brookes, H., & Larkin, M. (2013). Against the odds: Foster carers’ perceptions of family, commitment and belonging in successful placements. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18(1), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, C., & Woolgar, M. (2015). Looked-after children–a perspective into a more resilient future. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20(4), 181–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & Joughin, C. (2000). The mental health needs of looked after children. London: RCPsych Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostill-Brookes, H., Larkin, M., Toms, A., & Churchman, C. (2011). A shared experience of fragmentation: Making sense of foster placement breakdown. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16(1), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, G. (2005). Relationship-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child & Family Social Work, 10(2), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ, E. (2016). Witnessing resilience: Resilience of child protection workers in Queensland (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Queensland: Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, E., Lonne, B., & Darlington, Y. (2009). Using resilience to reconceptualise child protection workforce capacity. Australian Social Work, 62(3), 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, G., Biggart, L., Ward, E., & Larsson, B. (2015). Looked after children and offending: An exploration of risk, resilience and the role of social cognition. Children and Youth Services Review, 51, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (2009). Regulatory principles and reforming possibilities in child protection: What might be in the best interests of children? Communities. Children and Families Australia, 4(1), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., Arney, F., & Vimpani, G. (2010). Think child, think family, think community. In F. Arney & D. Scott (Eds.), Working with vulnerable families (pp. 7–33). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, I., & Wilson, K. (2003). Matches and mismatches: The contribution of carers and children to the success of foster placements. British Journal of Social Work, 33(7), 871–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, R., & Gibson, M. (2017). Less than human: A qualitative study into the experience of parents involved in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 565–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprang, G., Craig, C., & Clark, J. (2011). Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in child welfare workers: A comparative analysis of occupational distress across professional groups. Child Welfare, 90(6), 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijker, J., Zandberg, T., & van der Meulen, B. F. (2003). Kinship foster care and foster care in the Netherlands. Children and Youth Services Review, 25(11), 843–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-7409(03)00089-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (2011). Care planning and review for looked after children: Fifteen years of slow progress? The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, D. H. (1994). Evaluating child protection. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turney, D. (2012). A relationship-based approach to engaging involuntary clients: The contribution of recognition theory. Child & Family Social Work, 17(2), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tusla Child and Family Agency [Ireland]. (2017). The Prevention, Partnership and Family Support Programme: Collaborative leadership for better outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.tusla.ie/uploads/content/PPFS_Low_Prevention_Services_Brochure.pdf

  • Winkworth, G., & McArthur, M. (2007). Developing communities of support for vulnerable children: Shifting the focus from risk. Communities, Children and Families Australia, 3(2), 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withington, T., Burton, J., Lonne, B., & Eviers, A. (2016). Carer perspectives of factors affecting placement trajectories of children in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withington, T., Duplock, R., Burton, J., Eivers, A., & Lonne, B. (2017). Exploring children’s perspectives of engagement with their carers using factor analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 63, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M., & Selwyn, J. (2017). Looked after children and young people’s views on what matters to their subjective well-being. Adoption & Fostering, 41(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Buckley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buckley, H., McArthur, M., Moore, T., Russ, E., Withington, T. (2019). Stakeholder’s Experiences of the Forensic Child Protection Paradigm. In: Lonne, B., Scott, D., Higgins, D., Herrenkohl, T.I. (eds) Re-Visioning Public Health Approaches for Protecting Children. Child Maltreatment, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05858-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05858-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05857-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05858-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics