Abstract
The Young Adolescent Engagement in Learning (YAEL) Model provides a holistic approach to the provision of support for young adolescent learners. Developed from an extensive review of the international literature, as well as extant student learning support initiatives and strategies for student engagement, the Model represents a unifying framework of best practice approaches, which serves the needs of those working in the fields of student engagement and retention. Development of the Model was also informed by findings from a large research study, including consultations and interviews with a range of key stakeholders, in an Australian educational jurisdiction. This chapter first describes the methodological approach used to develop the Model and then discusses the overarching dimensions that constitute Layer 1 of the Model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011). Basic community profile Australian Capital Territory. http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/communityprofile/8ACTE.
Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (2012). Junior secondary—Theory and practice. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland Government, Department of Education and Training.
Australian Public Service Commission (APSC). (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government, APSC.
Borgonovi, F., & Pál, J. (2016). A framework for the analysis of student well-being in the PISA 2015 study: Being 15 in 2015 (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 140). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpszwghvvb-en.
Bridgeland, J. M., Dilulio, J. J., Jr., & Morison, K. B. (2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises.
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Community Services Directorate, ACT Government. (2015). A picture of ACT’s children and young people: Health, wellbeing, learning and development outcomes for children and young people living in the Australian Capital Territory. Canberra, ACT: ACT Government.
Cranston, N., Watson, J., Allen, J. M., Wright, S., Hay, I., Beswick, K., … Kameniar, B. (2016). Overcoming the challenges of keeping young people in education: A wicked problem with implications for leadership, policy and practice. Leading and Managing, 22(1), 1–18.
De Jong, T., & Griffiths, C. (2006). The role of alternative education programs in meeting the needs of adolescent students with challenging behaviour: Characteristics of best practice. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 16(1), 29–40.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2008). Scoping study into approaches to student wellbeing. Canberra, ACT: Author.
Hay, I., Wright, S., Watson, J., Allen, J. M., Beswick, K., & Cranston, N. (2016). Parent-child connectedness for schooling and students’ performance and aspirations. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 50–61.
Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2010). Re-engaging young people in education: Success factors in alternative schools. Brisbane, QLD: Youth Affairs Network Queensland.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris, France: Author.
Osher, D., Banks Amos, L., & Gonsoulin, S. (2012). Successfully transitioning youth who are delinquent between institutions and alternative and community schools. https://neglected-delinquent.ed.gov/sites/default/files/docs/successfully_transitioning_youth.pdf.
Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61(1), 59–78.
Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587–610). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Rumberger, R. W. (2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schnabel, K., Alfeld, C., Eccles, J., Koller, J., & Baumert, J. (2002). Parental influence on students’ educational choices in the United States and Germany: Different ramifications—Same effect? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(2), 178–198.
Shaddock, A., Packer, S., & Roy, A. (2015). Schools for all children and young people: Report of the expert panel on students with complex needs and challenging behaviour. Canberra, ACT: ACT Government, Education and Training Directorate.
Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/745.
Te Riele, K. (2007). Educational alternatives for marginalised youth. Australian Educational Researcher, 34(3), 53–68.
Theobald, P. (2009). Education now: How rethinking America’s past can change its future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Willms, J. D., & Flanagan, P. (2007). Canadian students: Tell them from me. Education Canada, 47(3), 46–50.
Willms, J. D., Friesen, S., & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic, and intellectual engagement. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Education Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, J., McGregor, G., Pendergast, D., Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2019). Modelling a Continuum of Support. In: Young Adolescent Engagement in Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05837-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05837-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05836-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05837-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)