Skip to main content

From Text to Speech: A Multimodal Cross-Domain Approach for Deception Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Recognition and Information Forensics (ICPR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 11188))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Deception detection -identifying when someone is trying to cause someone else to believe something that is not true- is a hard task for humans. The task is even harder for automatic approaches, that must deal with additional problems like the lack of enough labeled data. In this context, transfer learning in the form of cross-domain classification is a task that aims to leverage labeled data from certain domains for which labeled data is available to others for which data is scarce. This paper presents a study on the suitability of linguistic features for cross-domain deception detection on multimodal data. Specifically, we aim to learn models for deception detection across different domains of written texts (one modality) and apply the new knowledge to unrelated topics transcribed from spoken statements (another modality). Experimental results reveal that by using LIWC and POS n-grams we reach a in-modality accuracy of 69.42%, as well as an AUC ROC of 0.7153. When doing transfer learning, we achieve an accuracy of 63.64% and get an AUC ROC of 0.6351.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    They were all implemented on Weka using the default values.

  2. 2.

    Tables containing all the results gotten from each classifier can be found in Appendix A, but DT are not included since they were constantly outperformed by the other classifiers.

References

  1. Pérez-Rosas, V., Mihalcea, R.: Cross-cultural deception detection. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 440–445. Association for Computational Linguistics (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ekman, P.: Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage, Revised edn. WW Norton & Company, New York City (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S., Richards, J.M.: Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29(5), 665–675 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pérez-Rosas, V., Abouelenien, M., Mihalcea, R., Burzo, M.: Deception detection using real-life trial data. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 59-66. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abouelenien, M., Pérez-Rosas, V., Zhao, B., Mihalcea, R., Burzo, M.: Detecting deceptive behavior via integration of discriminative features from multiple modalities. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 12(5), 1042–1055 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abouelenien, M., Pérez-Rosas, V., Zhao, B., Mihalcea, R., Burzo, M.: Gender-based multimodal deception detection. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing (2017). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3019612.3019644

  7. Wu, Z., Singh, B., Davis, L.S., Subrahmanian, V.: Deception detection in videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04415 (2017)

  8. Sapkota, U., Bethard, S., Montes, M., Solorio, T.: Not all character N-grams are created equal: a study in authorship attribution. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 93-102 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C., Singer, Y.: Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In: Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003, pp. 252–259 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Rill-García .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A Results achieved by each classifier for all the proposed representations in the 15 study cases

Appendix A Results achieved by each classifier for all the proposed representations in the 15 study cases

See (Tables 10, 11, and 12)

Table 10. Results gotten by NB for the 15 case studies with all the proposed representations.
Table 11. Results gotten by SVM for the 15 case studies with all the proposed representations.
Table 12. Results gotten by RF for the 15 case studies with all the proposed representations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rill-García, R., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., Reyes-Meza, V., Escalante, H.J. (2019). From Text to Speech: A Multimodal Cross-Domain Approach for Deception Detection. In: Zhang, Z., Suter, D., Tian, Y., Branzan Albu, A., Sidère, N., Jair Escalante, H. (eds) Pattern Recognition and Information Forensics. ICPR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11188. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05792-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05792-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05791-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05792-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics