Skip to main content

Carnot’s Theory of Heat, and Kelvin’s Adoption of Which in Terms of Energy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Treatise of Heat and Energy

Part of the book series: Mechanical Engineering Series ((MES))

  • 696 Accesses

Abstract

MEH surmised work production to be resulting from the consumption of heat . Carnot demonstrated that work production is derived from the transfer of heat. Kelvin and Clausius were able to synthesize the two competing theories into one theory by incorporating Carnot’s theory to accord for what was meant by “consumption”. This chapter covers Carnot’s theory of heat and how Kelvin incorporated Carnot’s theory into the MTH in terms of absolute thermodynamic temperature , the Carnot–Kelvin formula , and the concept of available energy and the energy principle , which is Kelvin’s version of the second law of thermodynamics. That is, Kelvin formulated a thermodynamics theory in terms of energy: in terms of energy conservation and energy availability, as well as the universality in the direction of energy form transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It has been mentioned in Sect. 1.3 and will be suggested repeatedly that irreversibility and “away from equilibrium existence” are synonymous: there is no irreversibility if the world is at equilibrium; it is also impossible to be away from equilibrium without any manifestation of irreversibility.

  2. 2.

    Frictional is a better term here than dissipative as Kelvin used “dissipative” to represent both dispersal kinds and frictional kinds. In the following, I’ll follow Kelvin using dissipative processes as general irreversible processes: dispersal and frictional processes as two specific kinds of irreversibility.

  3. 3.

    Thought experiments (theoretically constructed experiments) are devices of the imagination used to investigate the nature of things. We need only to list a few of the well-known thought experiments to be reminded of their enormous influence and importance in the sciences: Galileo’s tower of Pisa, Newton’s bucket, Maxwell’s demon, Einstein’s elevator, Heisenberg’s gamma-ray microscope, Schrödinger’s cat and, of course, Carnot’s cycle.

  4. 4.

    In the 1848 paper, he had this to say: “the conversion of heat (or caloric) into mechanical effect is probably impossible*, certainly undiscovered.” In the *footnote, however, Kelvin acknowledged the contrary opinion advocated by Joule, and signaled the move to accept the MEH that he would take in a very short time (1851).

  5. 5.

    In the case of a steady-state general system, it may be noted that the entropy flowing out of the system is always larger than the entropy flowing into the system as a result of entropy production. See Chap. 6 for more details.

  6. 6.

    The treatment of the second law advocated here is closest to that of Planck, which stresses the centrality of the second law and the energetic/entropic understanding of heat. A distinction is made between MEH (in its pure sense, not how Joule and Kelvin interpreted it as discussed in Sect. 4.7) and the “reductive” mechanical theory of heat . In the specific treatment of Q (heat exchange, not heat in the general inclusive sense) in Sects. 3.2 and 3.3 in the above, however, I followed Helmholtz and Born by adopting the “mechanical” definition of Q—which is different from Planck, who considers heat to be a primitive concept and elects to stay away from the reductive mechanical theory of heat approach. For clarity, it is noted again that the use of the “mechanical” definition of Q in Sect. 3.3 does not require the full acceptance of the reductive mechanical theory of heat.

  7. 7.

    This passage is from a draft of Paper [4]. It is taken from a quotation in Ref. [11:329]

  8. 8.

    Efficient cause may be characterized by the description,

    Physics knows nothing of causation except that it is the invariable and unconditional sequence of one event upon another:

    July does not cause August, though it invariably precedes it.

    That is, cause-and-effect in science is characterized by constant conjunction (of force and acceleration, e.g.,) and invariable sequence (July and August, e.g.,).

References

  1. Carnot S (1824) Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire. [Reprinted from Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire and Other Papers, edited by E. Mendoza. Dover Publications, New York (1960)]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhn TS (1955) Carnot’s version of Carnot’s cycle. Am J Phys 23:91–95 (p. 94)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jaynes ET (1984) The evolution of Carnot’s principle. EMBO Workshop on Maximum-Entropy Methods (Orsay, France, April 24–28, 1984. Reprinted in Ercksen & Smith [1988], 1:267–282)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomson W (Lord Kelvin) (1911) Mathematical and Physical Papers of William Thomson 1:1–571. Cambridge Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fermi E (1956) Thermodynamics. Dover (p. 48)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Truesdell C (1980) The Tragicomical History of Thermodynamics: 1822–1854. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Cropper WH (1986) Carnot’s function: Origins of the thermodynamic concept of temperature. Am J Phys 55 (No. 2):120–129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. La Mer VK (1954) Some current misinterpretations of N.L. Sadi Carnot’s memoir and cycle. Am J Phys 22:20–27 (p. 26)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kipnis N (2014) Thermodynamics and mechanical equivalent of heat. Sci and Educ 23:2007–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Merz JT (1896–1914) A History of European Thought in the 19th Century, Volume 2. (pp. 129–130)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith C, Wise MN (1989) Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin. Cambridge Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Von Baeyer HC (1998) Maxwell’s Demon: Why warmth disperses and time passes. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Uffink J (2001) Bluff your way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Stud Hist Phil Sci Part B: 2001 Studies in Hist and Philo of Modern Physics 32(No. 2):305–395

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith C (1991) Lord Kelvin: Scientist of energy. Supercond Sci Technol 4:502–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang LS (2011) Causal efficacy and the normative notion of sustainability science. SSPP 7(No. 2):30–40

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin-Shu Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, LS. (2020). Carnot’s Theory of Heat, and Kelvin’s Adoption of Which in Terms of Energy. In: A Treatise of Heat and Energy. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05746-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05746-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05745-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05746-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics