The Effect of Heat Treatment to FePt/Fe2O3 and FePt/Cu Magnetic Performance

  • Naidu SeetalaEmail author
  • Deidre Henderson
  • Jumel Jno-Baptiste
  • Hao Wen
  • Shengmin Guo
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


The effect of heat treatment to FePt/Fe2O3 and FePt/Cu magnetic performance was examined in this paper. To obtain desired phase transformations for high magnetic storage media, a self-assembled layer of FePt nanoparticles was placed between two layers of Fe2O3 nanoparticles using surfactants on Si and Cu substrates to minimize aggregation during heat treatment. To eliminate the surfactant, a sample made by simply mixing FePt and Cu nanoparticles in hexane was deposited on a Cu substrate. Vacuum furnace annealing at 600 °C (1 h) or laser heat treatment at 20, 40, 80 W at a speed of 1–1.5 m/s were carried out on the samples. The coercivity of FePt/Fe2O3-layered samples increased from 148 Oe to 366 Oe and 246 Oe for furnace annealed samples on Si and Cu substrates, respectively; while, it remained almost unchanged in laser heat-treated samples on Cu substrate and slightly higher magnetization at 40 W compared to 20 W laser heat treatment of samples on Si substrate. The FePt/Cu nanoparticles mixer layer on Cu substrate was subjected to laser heat treatment at 40 and 80 W. The coercivity at both laser powers did not show any significant change. During the 80 W laser heat treatment, most of the particles escaped from the surface indicating a high temperature process. The results indicate that the furnace annealing at 600 °C brings the desired magnetic phase transformation in all cases, while the laser heat treatment even at high power does not bring the phase transformation due to very short time period for processing.


Magnetic storage media Magnetization FePt nanoparticles Laser heating Vacuum annealing 



This work is supported by the National Science Foundation through the NSF EPSCoR CIMM cooperative agreement award OIA-1541079 to the Louisiana Board of Regents.


  1. 1.
    Sun S, Murray CB, Weller D, Folk L, Moser A (2000) Monodisperse FePt nanoparticles and ferromagnetic FePt nanocrystal superlattices. Science 287(5460):1989–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang S, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1191–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schleifenbaum H, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, Hinke C (2010) Individualized production by means of high power selective laser melting. Cirp J Manuf Sci Technol 2:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harrell JW, Nikles DE, Kang SS, Sun XC, Jia Z, Shi S, Lawson J, Thompson GB, Srivastava C, Seetala NV (2005) Effect of metal additives on L10 ordering of chemically synthesized FePt nanoparticles. Scr Mater 53(4):411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yi DK, Zafiropoulou I, Papaefthymiou GC (2012) Coercivity enhancement of FePt thin films coated with a monolayer array of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Thin Solid Films 522:376–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maeda T, Kai T, Kikitsu A, Nagase T, Akiyama J (2002) Reduction of ordering temperature of an FePt-ordered alloy by addition of Cu. Appl Phys Lett 80:2147–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Platt CL, Wierman KW, Svedberg EB, Veerdonk R, Howard JK, Roy AG, Laughlin DE (2002) L10 ordering and microstructure of FePt thin films with Cu, Ag, and Au additive. J Appl Phys 92:6104–6109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cao D, Li H, Pan L, Li J, Wang X, Jing P, Cheng X, Wang W, Wang J, Liu Q (2016) High saturation magnetization of γ-Fe2O3 nano-particles by a facile one-step synthesis approach. Sci Rep 6:32360. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu XN, Wolfus Y, Shaulov A, Yeshurun Y, Felner I, Nowik I, Koltypin Y, Gedanken A (2002) Annealing study of Fe2O3 nanoparticles: magnetic size effects and phase transformations. J Appl Phys 91:4611–4616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahdavi M, Ahmad MB, Haron MJ, Namvar F, Nadi B, Rahman MZ, Amin J (2013) Synthesis, surface modification and characterisation of biocompatible magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Molecules 18:7533–7548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takahashi YK, Ohnuma M, Hono K (2002) Effect of Cu on the structure and magnetic properties of FePt sputtered film. J Magn Magn Mater 246:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    George TA, Li Z, Yan M, Xu Y, Skomski R, Sellmyer DJ (2008) Nanostructure and magnetic properties of L10 FePt: X films. J Appl Phys 103:07D502(1–3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naidu Seetala
    • 1
    Email author
  • Deidre Henderson
    • 1
  • Jumel Jno-Baptiste
    • 1
  • Hao Wen
    • 2
  • Shengmin Guo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and PhysicsGrambling State UniversityGramblingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations