Athens Urban Soundscape (ATHUS): A Dataset for Urban Soundscape Quality Recognition

  • Theodoros GiannakopoulosEmail author
  • Margarita Orfanidi
  • Stavros Perantonis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11295)


Soundscape can be regarded as the auditory landscape, conceived individually or at collaborative level. This paper presents ATHUS (ATHens Urban Soundscape), a dataset of audio recordings of ambient urban sounds, which has been annotated in terms of the corresponding perceived soundscape quality. To build our dataset, several users have recorded sounds using a simple smartphone application, which they also used to annotate the recordings, in terms of the perceived quality of the soundscape (i.e. level of “pleasantness”), in a range of 1 (unbearable) to 5 (optimal). The dataset has been made publicly available (in as an audio feature representation form, so that it can directly be used in a supervised machine learning pipeline without need for feature extraction. In addition, this paper presents and publicly provides ( a baseline approach, which demonstrates how the dataset can be used to train a supervised model to predict soundscape quality levels. Experiments under various setups using this library have demonstrated that Support Vector Machine Regression outperforms SVM Classification for the particular task, which is something expected if we consider the gradual nature of the soundscape quality labels. The goal of this paper is to provide to machine learning engineers, working on audio analytics, a first step towards the automatic recognition of soundscape quality in urban spaces, which could lead to powerful assessment tools in the hands of policy makers with regards to noise pollution and sustainable urban living.


Audio analysis Soundscape quality Audio classification Regression Open-source 


  1. 1.
    Berglund, B., Nilsson, M.E.: On a tool for measuring soundscape quality in urban residential areas. Acta Acust. United Acust. 92(6), 938–944 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brambilla, G., Gallo, V., Zambon, G.: The soundscape quality in some urban parks in Milan, Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10(6), 2348–2369 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deecke, V.B., Janik, V.M.: Automated categorization of bioacoustic signals: avoiding perceptual pitfalls. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119(1), 645–653 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giannakopoulos, T.: pyAudioAnalysis: an open-source Python library for audio signal analysis. PloS one 10(12), e0144610 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giannakopoulos, T., Siantikos, G., Perantonis, S., Votsi, N.E., Pantis, J.: Automatic soundscape quality estimation using audio analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, p. 19. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McFee, B., et al.: LibROSA: audio and music signal analysis in Python. In: Proceedings of the 14th Python in Science Conference, pp. 18–25 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morillas, J.B., Escobar, V.G., Vílchez-Gómez, R., Sierra, J.M., del Río, F.C.: Sound quality in urban environments and its relationship with some acoustics parameters. Acústica (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raimbault, M., Dubois, D.: Urban soundscapes: experiences and knowledge. Cities 22(5), 339–350 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raimbault, M., Lavandier, C., Bérengier, M.: Ambient sound assessment of urban environments: field studies in two French cities. Appl. Acoust. 64(12), 1241–1256 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thorogood, M., Pasquier, P.: Impress: a machine learning approach to soundscape affect classification for a music performance environment. In: NIME, pp. 256–260 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, W., Kang, J.: Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Appl. Acoust. 66(2), 211–229 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu, L., Kang, J.: Modeling subjective evaluation of soundscape quality in urban open spaces: an artificial neural network approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126(3), 1163–1174 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodoros Giannakopoulos
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Margarita Orfanidi
    • 3
  • Stavros Perantonis
    • 2
  1. 1.Behavioral Signal Technologies Inc.Los AngelesUSA
  2. 2.National Center for Scientific Research DemokritosAthensGreece
  3. 3.National Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations