Skip to main content

Interrituality in Contemporary China as a Field of Tension Between Abstention and Polytropy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interreligious Relations and the Negotiation of Ritual Boundaries

Part of the book series: Interreligious Studies in Theory and Practice ((INSTTP))

Abstract

This chapter explores interrituality in the context of contemporary China. Since the end of Maoism and the initiation of political reforms in 1978, a greater freedom exists for Chinese people to organize and participate in communal rituals. In this context, in the region called Southern Fujian, both a revival of popular religion and a wave of conversion to Protestant Christianity are taking place. My ethnographic research explores how practitioners in these different ritual systems live together as spouses; as parents and children; as grandparents and grandchildren. I refer to such households as ‘pluriprax households.’ Due to their conflicting ritual obligations, members of pluriprax households in Southern Fujian commonly face complex choices to abstain from each other’s communal rituals or to engage in polytropy, that is to enact rituals from multiple ritual systems. Considering the fact that polytropy was once the norm, how did abstention become a salient way to engage with the religious Other in modern China? This question is important because of the rapid pluralization of China’s religious landscape in recent decades. The chapter zooms in on the ethnographic example of a recently married couple who converted to Protestant Christianity and illicitly abstained from the ancestral lineage’s annual ‘incense division’ procession during Spring Festival. This example forms the basis to discuss how interrituality in contemporary China may be envisioned as a field of tension between abstention and polytropy.

My sister and I told our parents that we cannot participate in the traditional rituals. They announced this to the rest of the family at the funeral, but our family did not understand, they tried to convince us to participate.

When it was time for all women in the family to form a circle and kneel down [before our grandfather’s coffin], my sister and I did not kneel. Then, my aunt started pushing the back of my knees, to force me to kneel down. She forced me down on one knee, but God commands that we only kneel before him.

[At the grave site] a Daoist master invoked an idol, the Lord of the Soil, to release the ghost, but the ritual failed each time he tried. My sister and I were praying outside to God. When my mother told us to stop praying, promptly the ritual worked. Then she came to us and said: “Your God is also very powerful!” And I replied: “He is more powerful than your God!”

Interview, January 12, 2011

The fieldwork for and development of this chapter were made possible with funding from the Faculty of Theology of Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam through the Sustainable Humanities program of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). I am grateful to Professor Yi Lin 易林 and graduate student Li Rongyu 李荣誉 of Xiamen University for their kind support during fieldwork. Pál Nyíri, Marianne Moyaert, and Peter Peverelli of the Vrije Universiteit, as well as Adam Yuet Chau at the University of Cambridge, have supported me during the writing stage of the chapter. I am also grateful to an anonymous reviewer for comments and suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    My data with regard to Mashan are derived from extensive interaction with members of one household over the course of fourteen months in Xiamen; casual talks with multiple Mashan residents during lunches, New Year visits, and dinners; as well as five days of participant observation in Mashan itself.

  2. 2.

    The term ‘family church’ is consciously used by practitioners to distinguish themselves from state-sanctioned churches of the Three Self Patriotic Movement, usually referred to simply as Three Self churches. I prefer this literal translation over the more common ‘house church’ in English-language sources, which is misleading because most family churches in Xiamen do not meet in houses but in office spaces, factory spaces, and hotel rooms.

References

  • Aikman, D. 2003. The Beijing Factor: How Christianity Is Transforming China and Changing the Global Balance of Power. Oxford: Monarch Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashiwa, Y., and D.L. Wank. 2009. Making Religion, Making the State in Modern China: An Introductory Essay. In Making Religion, Making the State: The Politics of Religion in Modern China, ed. Y. Ashiwa and D.L. Wank, 1–21. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bays, D.H. 2012. A New History of Christianity in China. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. 2009. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, N. 2010. Constructing China’s Jerusalem. Christians, Power, and Place in Contemporary Wenzhou. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrithers, M. 2000. On Polytropy: Or the Natural Condition of Spiritual Cosmopolitanism in India: The Digambar Jain Case. Modern Asian Studies 34 (4): 831–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, A.Y. 2006. Miraculous Response: Doing Popular Religion in Contemporary China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Modalities of Doing Religion and Ritual Polytropy: Evaluating the Religious Market Model from the Perspective of Chinese Religious History. Religion 41 (4): 547–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Efficacy, not Confessionality: On Ritual Polytropy in China. In Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Relations Around Holy Places, ed. G. Bowman, 79–96. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, K. 1993. Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of Southeast China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Local Communal Religion in Contemporary South-East China. The China Quarterly 174: 338–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunch, R. 2001. Fuzhou Protestants and the Making of a Modern China 1857–1927. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. 1980. Lineage Organization in Southeastern China. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goossaert, V., and D.A. Palmer. 2011. The Religious Question in Modern China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, P. 2017. Multiple Religious Belonging After Religion: Theorising Strategic Religious Participation in a Shared Religious Landscape as a Chinese Model. Open Theology 3: 48–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A., and K.K. Chan. 1993. Protestantism in Contemporary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, R. 2011. Religious Renaissance in China Today. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 40 (2): 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y.F. 2017. The Rise of Protestantism in Post-Mao China: State and Religion in Historical Perspective. American Journal of Sociology 122 (6): 1664–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szonyi, M. 2002. Practicing Kinship: Lineage and Descent in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C.B. 2006. Chinese Religious Expressions in Post-Mao Yongchun, Fujian, Southern Fujian. In Southern Fujian: Reproduction of Traditions in Post-Mao China, ed. Chee-beng Tan, 97–120. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. 1965. From Friendship to Comradeship. The China Quarterly 21: 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.L. 1982. Chinese Kinship Reconsidered: Anthropological Perspectives on Historical Research. The China Quarterly 92: 589–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, C. 2011. Authentically Chinese, Thoroughly Christian: Stories of Minnan Protestants, 1846–1937. PhD Thesis, Xiamen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F.G. 1998. Chinese Conversion to Evangelical Christianity: The Importance of Social and Cultural Contexts. Sociology of Religion 59 (3): 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying, F.T. 2009. The Regional Development of Protestant Christianity in China: 1918, 1949, and 2004. The China Review 9 (2): 63–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Colijn, B. (2019). Interrituality in Contemporary China as a Field of Tension Between Abstention and Polytropy. In: Moyaert, M. (eds) Interreligious Relations and the Negotiation of Ritual Boundaries. Interreligious Studies in Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05701-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics