Advertisement

Research on Lean Culture in Higher Education—A Theoretical Framework

  • Justyna MaciągEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The author presents the reasons for undertaking research on Lean Culture (LC) in higher education (HE), as well as the methodology followed in the research presented in the book. She defines the adopted ontological and epistemological approaches to research on LC as the organisational culture of higher education institutions, cognitive gap, cognitive and methodological objectives, research problems, as well as research theses and hypotheses. The author describes also the stages of the research on LC in HE. She presents the applied qualitative and quantitative methods as well as the criteria of selecting universities to participate in the research.

References

  1. Alvesson, M. (2009). At home ethnography: Struggling with closeness and closure. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels, & F. H. Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexity of everyday life (pp. 156–217). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M. (2013). The triumph of emptiness: Consumption, higher education, and work organization. Oxford: Oxford Unversity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Antonowicz, D. (2015). Między siłą globalnych procesów a lokalną tradycją. Polskie szkolnictwo wyższe w dobie przemian [Between the power of global processes and the local tradition. Poland’s higher education in the period of changes]. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.Google Scholar
  4. Antony, J. (2014). Readiness factors for the Lean Six Sigma journey in the higher education sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(2), 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babbie, E. R. (2013). Podstawy badań społecznych [The basics of social research]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
  6. Balzer, K. (2010). Lean higher education. New York: CRP Press, Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balzer, W. K., Francis, D. E., Krehbiel, T. C., & Shea, N. (2016). A review and perspective on lean in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(4), 442–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (2009). Teoria ugruntowana. Praktyczny przewodnik po analizie jakościowej [Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych: metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane [Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
  10. Czarniawska, B. (2010). Trochę inna teoria organizacji. Organizowanie jako konstrukcja sieci działań [A little bit different theory of organization. Organizing as constructing a network of activities]. Warszawa: Poltext.Google Scholar
  11. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2015). Management and business research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Emiliani, B. (2015). Lean university: A guide to renewal and prosperity. Wethersfield: CLBM, LCC. Google Scholar
  13. Francis D. E., Krehbiel T. C., & Balzer W. K. (2017). Lean applications in higher education. Downloaded from https://the-lmj.com/2017/03/.
  14. Geppert, M., & Hollinshead, G. (2017). Signs of dystopia and demoralization in global academia: Reflections on the precarious and destructive effects of the colonization of the Lebenswelt. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 13(2), 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hines, P., & Lethbridge, S. (2008). New development: Creating a Lean university. Public Money and Management, 28(1), 53–56.Google Scholar
  16. Jo Hatch, M., & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5/6), 356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawalec, P. (2017). Ewaluacja – teoria i metodologia [Evaluation—Theory and methodology]. In G. Prawelska-Skrzypek (Ed.), Ewaluacja w procesie tworzenia polityki naukowej i innowacyjnej. Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.Google Scholar
  18. Kostera, M. (2003). Antropologia organizacji. Metodologia badań terenowych [Anthropology of organizations. Field research methodology]. Warszawa: WN PWN.Google Scholar
  19. Kvale, S. (2010). Prowadzenie wywiadów [Doing interviews]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
  20. Kwiek, M. (2001). Filozofia – demokracja – uniwersytet. Wyzwania epoki globalizacji [Philosophy – democracy – university. Challenges in the epoch of globalization]. In P. W. Juchacz, K. Kozłowski, & A. Cooper (Eds.), Filozofia a demokracja, t. III. Poznań: IF UAM. Google Scholar
  21. Kwiek, M. (2015). Uniwersytet w dobie przemian [The university in the period of changes]. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
  22. Leja, K. (2013). Zarządzanie uczelnią. Koncepcje i współczesne wyzwania [University management. Concepts and contemporary challenges]. Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer Business.Google Scholar
  23. Lenartowicz, M. (2016). Natura oporu Uniwersytet jako samowytwarzający się system społeczny [The nature of resistance. The university as a self-creating social system]. Poznań: CSPP UAM.Google Scholar
  24. Liker, J. K. (2005). The Toyota Way. Warsaw: Esensi.Google Scholar
  25. Maciąg, J. (2016). Uwarunkowania wdrożenia koncepcji Lean Service w polskich szkołach wyższych [The conditions of implementing the lean service concept in Polish higher education institutions]. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 1(33), 51–64.Google Scholar
  26. Maciąg, J. (2018). Kultura Lean Management w polskich szkołach wyższych (wyniki badań pilotażowych) [The lean management culture in Polish higher education institutions (pilot studies results)]. Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 1(51), 69–95.Google Scholar
  27. Ott, J. S. (1989). The organizational culture perspective. Chicago, IL: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  28. Radnor, Z., & Bucci, G. (2011). Analysis of lean implementation in UK business schools and universities. London: Association of Business Schools.Google Scholar
  29. Santana, S., Moreira, C., Roberto, T., & Azambuja, F. (2010). Fighting for excellence: The case of the Federal University of Pelotas. Higher Education, 60(3), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (Jossey-Bass business & management series). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  31. Sikorski, C. (2009). Kształtowanie kultury organizacyjnej: filozofia, strategie, metody [The shaping of organizational culture: Philosophy, strategies, methods]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.Google Scholar
  32. Sobczyk, M. (2002). Statystyka.(wyd. IV) [Statistics (edition IV)]. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
  33. Spencer, N. H. (2013). Essentials of multivariate data analysis. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall and CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sułkowski, Ł. (2012). Kulturowe procesy zarządzania [Cultural management processes]. Warszawa: Difin.Google Scholar
  35. Sułkowski, Ł. (2016). Kultura akademicka. Koniec utopii? [The academic culture. The end of a utopia?] Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
  36. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  37. Waterbury, T. (2011). Educational lean for higher education: Theory and practice. Lulu.com.
  38. Weick, K. (2016). Tworzenie sensu w organizacjach [Sensemaking in organizations]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
  39. Yorkstone, S. (2016). Lean universities. In T. Netland & D. J. Powell (Eds.). The Routledge companion to lean management. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis (Routledge). Google Scholar
  40. Zawadzki, M. (2014). Nurt krytyczny w zarządzaniu: kultura, edukacja, teoria [The critical trend in management: Culture, education, theory]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademickie SEDNO Spółka z oo. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Public AffairsJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations