Interview Results: The Design Reviewer as Therapist

  • Joongsub KimEmail author


This chapter discusses how design reviewers act as therapists throughout the design review process. In the role of therapist, the design reviewer focuses on managing interpersonal stresses regarding sensible responses to participants’ emotional challenges in design review, such as anger, frustration, fear, mistrust, and distress. When and how reviewers can use techniques of listening, comforting, consoling, understanding, storytelling, conversation, and positive reinforcement is discussed.


  1. Baum, Howell. (1997). The organization of hope. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Forester, J. (1999a). Challenges of mediation and deliberation in the design professions: Practice stories from Israel and Norway. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 16(2), 116–132.Google Scholar
  3. Forester, J. (1999b). The deliberative practioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Healey, P. (2006). Urban Complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoch, C. (1994). What plannes do: Power, politics and persuasion. Chicago: Planning Press.Google Scholar
  6. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Sandercock, L. (2003). Dreaming the Sustainable City: Organizing hope, negotiating fear, mediating memory. In Eckstein, B. and J. Throgmorton (Eds). Story and sustainability: Planning, practice, and possibility for American Cities, Massachusetts (pp. 142–164). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Architecture and DesignLawrence Technological UniversitySouthfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations