Skip to main content

Governing the Corporation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance ((SIF))

Abstract

We review the scale and power of the corporation and compare it to national governments, showing that its impact on the natural environment and society is beyond the powers of regulation of any individual state. We explore the origins of the corporate form, from its early days as a vehicle for imperial expansion to its proliferation as the primary form of almost all economic activity. The scale and ubiquity of the corporation poses the question of how the company is governed: in short, its ownership and control. The rapid evolution of corporate governance as a focus of regulatory concern, and financial consequence, is explained as a response to harness this tremendous economic power to the wider objectives of the financial ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hansmann et al. (2006) argue that entity shielding is an innovation that can only arise from the law, whereas limited liability, a more celebrated form of asset partitioning, can be implemented through the operation of contracts. Mahoney (2000) argues that entity shielding can and indeed did arise from contracts: “For most of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the separate personality of business organizations survived in practice despite judicial and legislative attempts to undermine it.”

  2. 2.

    Reflecting on the success of the English experiment to expand cheap company registration and invite a wider participation by offering limited liability in the late nineteenth century, The Economist commented that “the economic historian of the future may assign to the nameless inventor of the principle of limited liability, as applied to trading corporations, a place of honour with Watt and Stephenson, and other pioneers of the industrial revolution. The genius of these men produced the means by which man’s command of natural resources was multiplied many times over; the limited liability company the means by which huge aggregations of capital required to give effect to their discoveries were collected, organised and efficiently administered.” The Economist, December 18, 1926—quoted in Hunt (1936).

  3. 3.

    See Bowen (2000) for a short history of the Company, written to commemorate the 400th anniversary of its founding.

  4. 4.

    Lal (2018) notes that it took Roe a long time to understand that he had to negotiate with Nur Jahan as the effective ruler and not Jahangir. There is no record among the extensive documents of the Mughal court that Jahangir ever met Roe, or that he granted any trading privileges to him or the EIC.

  5. 5.

    The outcome of 1757 battle of Plassey was sealed by bribery and duplicity rather than military prowess. It has been described as ‘a transaction’ rather than a battle.

  6. 6.

    Pyramidal groups are an affiliated group of companies, controlled by an apex shareholder through direct and indirect control holdings. Very often, pyramidal groups allow one company or family to control an empire of companies with a relatively small portion of the invested capital of the companies within the group. See section I.C of La Porta et al. (1999) for examples of pyramidal groups.

  7. 7.

    Some markets have layers of both civil and common law frameworks, explained by the history of waves of colonization bringing different legal systems to bear (Indonesia and the Philippines being examples of countries where such complexities apply).

  8. 8.

    Between 1976 and 2016, the number of listed companies per capita in the U.S. dropped from 23 to 11. See Doidge, Kahle, Karolyi, and Stulz (2018) for a detailed analysis of this phenomenon.

  9. 9.

    The share of equity capital raised through initial public offerings of $100 million or less in advanced economies fell steadily from 21% in 1994–2000 to 11% in 2014 (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2015).

References

  • Abatino, B., Dari-Mattiacci, G., & Perotti, E. C. (2011). Depersonalization of Business in Ancient Rome. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31(2), 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqr001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alborn, T. L. (1998). Conceiving Companies: Joint-Stock Politics in Victorian England. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation & Private Property. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. V. (2000). 400 Years of The East India Company. History Today, 50(7), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bris, D. L., Goetzmann, W. N., & Pouget, S. (2015). The Development of Corporate Governance in Toulouse: 1372–1946 (NBER Working Papers: 21335). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21335.pdf

  • Charkham, J., & Simpson, A. (1999). Fair Shares: The Future of Shareholder Power and Responsibility. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. (2017). Benefit Corporations in the United States and Community Interest Companies in the United Kingdom: Does Social Enterprise Actually Work? Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 37(1), 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: A Survey. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2012.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Bo, E. (2006). Regulatory Capture: A Review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203–225. https://academic.oup.com/oxrep/issue

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (2004). The First Crash: Lessons from the South Sea Bubble. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dari-Mattiacci, G., Gelderblom, O., Jonker, J., & Perotti, E. C. (2017). The Emergence of the Corporate Form. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 33(2), 193–236. https://academic.oup.com/jleo/issue

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. M., Lukomnik, J., & Pitt-Watson, D. (2006). The New Capitalists: How Citizen Investors Are Reshaping the Corporate Agenda. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, A., & Roell, A. (2005). Financing and Control in the Netherlands: A Historical Perspective. In R. K. Morck (Ed.), A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (pp. 467–506). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nicolo, G., Laeven, L., & Ueda, K. (2008). Corporate Governance Quality: Trends and Real Effects. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17(2), 198–228. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10429573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Kahle, K. M., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. (2018). Eclipse of the Public Corporation or Eclipse of the Public Markets? (NBER Working Papers: 24265). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w24265.pdf

  • European Corporate Governance Institute. (2019). Codes. Retrieved from https://ecgi.global/content/codes

  • Farrell, J. (2016). Corporate Funding and Ideological Polarization About Climate Change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509433112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fohlin, C. (2005). The History of Corporate Ownership and Control in Germany. In R. K. Morck (Ed.), A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (pp. 223–277). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, P. M. (2000). Famous First Bubbles: The Fundamentals of Early Manias. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelderblom, O., de Jong, A., & Jonker, J. (2011). An Admiralty for Asia. Isaac le Maire and Conflicting Conceptions About the Corporate Governance of the VOC. In J. Koppell (Ed.), The Origins of Shareholder Advocacy (pp. 29–60). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gelderblom, O., de Jong, A., & Jonker, J. (2013). The Formative Years of the Modern Corporation: The Dutch East India Company VOC, 1602–1623. Journal of Economic History, 73(4), 1050–1076. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayBackIssues?jid=JEH

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greg, W. R. (1853). Essays on Political and Social Science, Contributed Chiefly to the Edinburgh Review. London, UK: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R., & Squire, R. (2006). Law and the Rise of the Firm. Harvard Law Review, 119(5), 1335–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1994). The Bubble Act: Its Passage and Its Effects on Business Organization. Journal of Economic History, 54(3), 610–627. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayBackIssues?jid=JEH

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2000). Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organization, 1720–1844. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, J. P., & Williams, A. T. (2000). The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism: How Institutional Investors Can Make Corporate America More Democratic. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, R. W. (1997). Limited Liability in Historical Perspective. Washington & Lee Law Review, 54, 615–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogfeldt, P. (2005). The History and Politics of Corporate Ownership in Sweden. In R. K. Morck (Ed.), A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (pp. 517–579). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, B. C. (1936). The Development of the Business Corporation in England 1800–1867. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, P. (2016, September 12). Study: Big Corporations Dominate List of World’s Top Economic Entities. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/sep/12/global-justice-now-study-multinational-businesses-walmart-apple-shell

  • Iskander, M. R., & Chamlou, N. (2000). Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/810311468739547854/pdf/multi-page.pdf

  • Jonsson, F. A. (2010). Rival Ecologies of Global Commerce: Adam Smith and the Natural Historians. American Historical Review, 115(5), 1342–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, V. S. (2005). The Economic History of the Corporate Form in Ancient India. Retrieved from Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=796464

  • Kindleberger, C. P. (1996). Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291540-6261/issues

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2018). Empress: The Astonishing Reign of Nur Jahan. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, P. G. (2000). Contract or Concession? An Essay on the History of Corporate Law. Georgia Law Review, 34(2), 873–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C. (2018). Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnick, K., & Noga, T. (2017). The Influence of Firm and Industry Political Spending on Tax Management Among S&P 500 Firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 233–254. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09291199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R. K. (2006). A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. E. (2005). Corporate Ownership in France: The Importance of History. In R. K. Morck (Ed.), A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (pp. 185–219). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1999). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). Growth Companies, Access to Capital Markets and Corporate Governance: OECD Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, N. (2012). The Corporation that Changed the World: How The East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational. Asian Affairs, 43(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2012.642512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. (2011). The Hybrid Military Establishment of the East India Company in South Asia: 1750–1849. Journal of Global History, 6(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740022811000222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1983). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. J. (2011). Soldier and Citizen in the Seventeenth-Century English East India Company. Journal of Early Modern History, 15(1/2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006511X552769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sur, N. (1976). The Bihar Famine of 1770. Indian Economic & Social History Review, 13(4), 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Time. (1963). The Oldest Corporation In the World. Time, 81(11), 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velde, F. R. (2016). What We Learn from a Sovereign Debt Restructuring in France in 1721. Economic Perspectives, 40(5), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E. (2018, August 14). Companies Shouldn’t be Accountable Only to Shareholders. Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, J., & Pape, J. C. (1999). A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(2), 152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. E., & Sylla, R. (2011). Corporate Governance and Stockholder/Stakeholder Activism in the United States, 1790–1860: New Data and Perspectives. In J. Koppell (Ed.), Origins of Shareholder Advocacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyajit Bose .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bose, S., Dong, G., Simpson, A. (2019). Governing the Corporation. In: The Financial Ecosystem. Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05624-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05624-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05623-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05624-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics