Skip to main content

Global Residents in Urban Networks: The Right to Asylum in European Cosmopoleis

  • 199 Accesses

Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST,volume 18)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to examine the limitations of our current political structures in incorporating the cosmopolitan principles that may be emerging in the normative developments of our global order. The perspective that I take is explicitly cosmopolitan, although it is elaborated out of an exercise of immanent criticism from within our existing institutional order. This analysis confronts spaces of the incipient articulation of cosmopolitan realities with political models of international legitimacy. This scenario constitutes an example of the incapacity of national state democracies to give a proper account of their foreign duties through national or supranational institutions. We briefly examine two emerging political sites that partially realize cosmopolitan realities in defiance of the national system. The first case is the political space of our metropoleis and their distinctive disposition towards refugees in Europe. The second case is the emergence of a cross-border network of urban connectivity and the alternative characterization of the refugee flows as a constitutive part in this transnational social fabric.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05590-5_9
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-05590-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Álvarez, D. 2012. Individual Membership in a Global Order: Terms of Respect and Standards of Justification. Public Reason 4 (2): 92–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Democracy for Idiots. Republicanism, Self-Alienation and Permanent Minorities. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 72 (4): 953–974. https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2016_72_4_0953.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Democratic Legitimacy, International Institutions and Cosmopolitan Disaggregation. Law, Ethics & Politics 4: 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. 2012. Land of Strangers. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 2017. Seeing like a City. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appaduray, A. 2004. The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition. In Culture and Public Action, ed. V. Rao and M. Walton, 59–84. Redwood: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1973 [1948]. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, F. 1995. Métapolis. Ou, l’avenir des villes. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. L’âge des métapoles. La Tour-d’Aigues: Éditions l’Aube.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. From Practice to Theory. Constellations 20 (1): 27–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Reason-Giving and Rights-Bearing: Constructing the Subject of Rights. Constellations 20 (1): 38–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, A. 2015. The Normative Terrain of the Global Refugee System. Ethics & International Affairs 29: 363–375.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, A., and P. Collier. 2017. Refuge. Transforming a Broken Refugee System. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M. 2016. Philosophy and the Refugee Crisis. What are the hard Questions? The Critique. [Especial issue –And Who is my Neighbor? Immigration, Human Rights and Sovereignty http://www.thecritique.com/articles/philosophy-the-refugee-crisis-what-are-the-hard-questions/.

  • Brenner, N. 2013. Theses on Urbanization. Public Culture 25 (1): 85–114.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2015. Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban? City 19 (2–3): 151–182.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J.H. 2013. The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, T. 2008. The Constitution of Equality. Democratic Authority and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions. In The Philosophy of International Law, ed. S. Besson and J. Tasioulas, 119–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. An Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 39: 142–176.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Replies to David Álvarez, David Lefkowitz, and Michael Blake. Law, Ethics & Politics 4: 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. 2010. The Just City. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. 2012. Humanitarian Reason. A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. From Right to Favor. The refugee Question as Moral Crisis. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/from-right-to-favor/.

  • Gibney, M. 2016. Liberal Democratic States and the Problem of the Refugee. Why Do Liebral Democratic States maintain a Commitment to the Institution of Asylum? The Critique. [Especial issue –And Who is my Neighbor? Immigration, Human Rights and Sovereignty http://www.thecritique.com/articles/liberal-democratic-states-the-problem-of-the-refugee-2/.

  • Harvey, D. 2013. Rebel Cities. From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafont, C. 2012. Global Governance and Human Rights, Spinoza Lectures Series. Amsterdam: Van Gorkum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Human Rights, Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect. Constellations 22 (1): 68–78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Sovereignty and the International Protection of Human Rights. Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (4): 427–445.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. 2003. The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. O Direito à Cidade. Lisbom: Estúdio e Letra Livre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 2016. Strangers in Our Midst. The Political Philosophy of Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Radical Politics as Counter-Hegemonic Intervention: The Role of Cultural Practices. In Ethics of the Urban. The City and the Spaces of the Political, ed. M. Mostafavi, 209–212. Zürich: Lars Muller Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C., and M. Miesse. 2012. The Space of Agonism. In The Space of Agonism. Markus Miessen in Conversation with Chantal Mouffe, ed. N. Hirsch and M. Miessen. Berlin: Stenberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, W.J. 2008. The Urban Question Revisited: The Importance of Cities for Social Movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (4): 841–859.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasiou, N. 2017. How Does Scale Mean? A Critical Approach to Scale in the Study of Policy. Critical Policy Studies 11 (1): 39–56.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, M. 2009. Hegemony and Difference in Political Movements: Articulating Networks of Equivalence. New Political Science 31 (3): 291–317.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Possible Worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the Right to the City. Journal of Urban Affairs 36 (1): 141–154.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. 1988. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of law and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock, L. 2003. Cosmopolis II. In Mongrel Cities in the 2st Century. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 2005. Cityness in the Urban Agen. Urban Age Bulletin 4: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights. From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Does the City have Speech? Public Culture 25 (2–70): 209–221.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Expulsions. Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E.W. 2010. Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Álvarez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Álvarez, D. (2019). Global Residents in Urban Networks: The Right to Asylum in European Cosmopoleis. In: Velasco, J., La Barbera, M. (eds) Challenging the Borders of Justice in the Age of Migrations. Studies in Global Justice, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05590-5_9

Download citation