Advertisement

Design of an Augmented Reality Serious Game for Children with Dyscalculia: A Case Study

  • Diego Fernando Avila-PesantezEmail author
  • Leticia Azucena Vaca-Cardenas
  • Rosa Delgadillo Avila
  • Nelly Padilla Padilla
  • Luis A. Rivera
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 895)

Abstract

Numeracy skills are essential in the modern world. However, many children experience difficulties in learning mathematics. This disorder is known as Dyscalculia, and it has a negative impact on the children affected by it. The students might find difficult to work with numbers, mental calculations and mathematical functions and symbols. From this context, several studies agree using Serious Games as an assistive mechanism in therapies can improve the students’ motivation, motor skills, and mathematical abilities. This article presents the design and a prototype of the Augmented Reality Serious Game named ATHYNOS for children with Dyscalculia. In the case study, forty children aged between 7–9 years with difficulties in learning mathematics from private and public primary schools, completed 4 weeks of computer game training for 15 min per day, twice a week. Results shown that children took significantly advantage from the training regarding basic numeracy, sequential order and mathematical reasoning, this game allows flexible adaptation to children’s learning.

Keywords

Serious games design ATHYNOS Dyscalculia Augmented Reality Serious Game 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Kass, C.E., Myklebust, H.R.: Learning disability: an educational definition. J. Learn. Disabil. 2(7), 377–379 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lyon, G.R.: Learning disabilities. In: The Future of Children, pp. 54–76 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Butterworth, B., Varma, S., Laurillard, D.: Dyscalculia: from brain to education. Science 332(6033), 1049–1053 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DfES: Guidance to Support Pupils with Dyslexia and Dyscalculia. Department for Education and Skills, London (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doyle, A.: Dyscalculia and mathematical difficulties: implications for transition to higher education in the Republic of Ireland (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bird, R.: The Dyscalculia Toolkit: Supporting Learning Difficulties in Maths. Sage, London (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chodura, S., Kuhn, J.-T., Holling, H.: Interventions for children with mathematical difficulties: a meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 223(2), 129 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Landerl, K.: Development of numerical processing in children with typical and dyscalculic arithmetic skills—a longitudinal study. Front. Psychol. 4, 459 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berch, D.B., Mazzocco, M.M.: Why is math so hard for some children? In: The Nature and Origins of Mathematical Learning Difficulties and Disabilities. Paul H Brookes Publishing (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cezarotto, M.A., Battaiola, A.L.: Contribuições do aprendizado multimídia para jogos com foco nas dificuldades da matemática (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Castro, M.V., Bissaco, M.A.S., Panccioni, B.M., Rodrigues, S.C.M., Domingues, A.M.: Effect of a virtual environment on the development of mathematical skills in children with dyscalculia. PLoS ONE 9(7), e103354 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Göbel, S.: Serious games application examples. In: Dörner, R., Göbel, S., Effelsberg, W., Wiemeyer, J. (eds.) Serious games, pp. 319–405. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40612-1_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katmada, A., Mavridis, A., Tsiatsos, T.: Implementing a game for supporting learning in mathematics. Electron. J. e-Learn. 12(3), 230–242 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liarokapis, F., De Freitas, S.: A case study of augmented reality serious games. In: Looking Toward the Future of Technology-Enhanced Education: Ubiquitous Learning and the Digital Native, pp. 178–191 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferrer, V., Perdomo, A., Rashed-Ali, H., Fies, C., Quarles, J.: How does usability impact motivation in augmented reality serious games for education? In: Book How Does Usability Impact Motivation in Augmented Reality Serious Games for Education?, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qian, M., Clark, K.R.: Game-based learning and 21st century skills: a review of recent research. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 50–58 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Torres-Carrión, P., Sarmiento-Guerrero, C., Torres-Diaz, J.C., Barba-Guamán, L.: Educational math game for stimulation of children with dyscalculia. In: Rocha, Á., Guarda, T. (eds.) ICITS 2018. AISC, vol. 721, pp. 614–623. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loijens, L.W., Brohm, D., Domurath, N.: What is augmented reality? In: Augmented Reality for Food Marketers and Consumers, p. 356. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mikoski, G.S.: The New Digital Shoreline: How Web 2.0 and Millennials are Revolutionizing Higher Education. By Roger McHaney, Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA (2011). xix+ 248 p. ISBN 978-1579224608. $29.95, Teaching Theology & Religion, 2013, 16 (S1)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yusof, N., Rias, R.M.: Serious game based therapeutic: towards therapeutic game design model for adolescence. In: Book Serious Game Based Therapeutic: Towards Therapeutic Game Design Model for Adolescence, pp. 40–45. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boyle, E., Connolly, T.M., Hainey, T.: The role of psychology in understanding the impact of computer games. Entertain. Comput. 2(2), 69–74 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cano, S., Arteaga, J.M., Collazos, C.A., Gonzalez, C.S., Zapata, S.: Toward a methodology for serious games design for children with auditory impairments. IEEE Latin Am. Trans. 14(5), 2511–2521 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kroesbergen, E.H., Van Luit, J.E.: Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: a meta-analysis. Remedial Spec. Educ. 24(2), 97–114 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee Swanson, H., Sachse-Lee, C.: A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD. J. Learn. Disabil. 33(2), 114–136 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cezarotto, M.A., Battaiola, A.L.: Game design recommendations focusing on children with developmental dyscalculia. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9753, pp. 463–473. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fullerton, T.: Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Motta, R.L., Junior, J.T.: Short game design document (SGDD): Documento de game design aplicado a jogos de pequeno porte e advergames Um estudo de caso do advergame Rockergirl Bikeway. Campinas Grande: Faculdade de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas FACISA (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rogers, S.: Level Up! The Guide to Great Video Game Design. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schell, J.: The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. AK Peters/CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schuytema, P.: Design de games: uma abordagem prática. Cengage Learning, Boston (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tang, S., Hanneghan, M.: Game content model: an ontology for documenting serious game design. In: Book Game Content Model: An Ontology for Documenting Serious Game Design, pp. 431–436. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hamari, J., Shernoff, D.J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., Edwards, T.: Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 54, 170–179 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mayer, I., et al.: The research and evaluation of serious games: toward a comprehensive methodology. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 45(3), 502–527 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ortega, W.: Instructivo para la aplicación de la evaluación estudiantil. In: Book Instructivo para la aplicación de la evaluación estudiantil. Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador, Quito (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of San MarcosLimaPeru
  2. 2.Polytechnic University of ChimborazoRiobambaEcuador
  3. 3.State University of North FluminenseRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options