Advertisement

Estimating the Potential Mortality of Griffon Vultures (Gyps fulvus) Due to Wind Energy Development on the Island of Crete (Greece)

  • Stavros M. XirouchakisEmail author
  • Efi Armeni
  • Stamatina Nikolopoulou
  • John Halley
Chapter

Abstract

Crete has been characterized as an area with a high wind energy capacity due to its mountainous terrain and the strong prevailing winds throughout the year. At the same time, the island constitutes the last stronghold for vulture species in Greece, currently holding the largest insular population of Eurasian griffons (Gyps fulvus) worldwide (ca. 1000 individuals). Given the empirical data on the mortality of large raptors due to collisions with wind turbine blades, the aim of the present study was to predict the potential impact of wind energy installations on the griffon vulture population on the island. The study was developed in two steps, namely, (a) the spatial mapping of the existing and planned wind energy projects up to the year 2012 and the delineation of their risk area and (b) the calculation of the annual collision rate based on the expected number of vulture risk flights and the probability of being killed. Overall, the minimum number of fatalities due to collision of vultures to wind turbines was estimated at 84 individuals per year. However, this figure could drop by over 50% if the European network of the NATURA 2000 sites was set as an exclusion zone for wind energy facilities. The study pinpoints the need for proper siting of wind farms and the prerequisite of sensitivity mapping for vulnerable species prone to collision on wind turbines.

Keywords

Wind farm Collision rate Cumulative impact NATURA 2000 site network 

References

  1. 1.
    Huntley, B., Collingham, Y.C., Green, R.E., Hilton, G.M., Rahbeck, C., Willis, S.G.: Potential impacts of climatic change upon geographical distribution of birds. Ibis. 148, 8–28 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    EC (European Commission): Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market (Document L0077-20040501) (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson, H.K., Curry, R.C.: Assessing avian interactions with wind plant development and operation. Translations 60th North American Wildlife and Nature Resource Conferences. In: Wildlife Management Institute (ed.), Minneapolis, pp. 266–287 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bevanger, K.1998: Biological and conservation aspects of bird mortality caused by electricity power lines: a review. Biol. Conserv. 86, 67–76 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ratcliffe, D.A.: Bird Life of Mountain and Upland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smallwood, K.S., Karas, B.: Avian and bat fatality rates at old-generation and repowered wind turbines in California. J. Wildl. Manag. 73, 1062–1071 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strickland, M.D., Arnett, E.B., Erickson, W.P., Johnson, D.H., Johnson, G.D., Morrison, M.L., Shaffer, J.A., Warren-Hicks, W.: Comprehensive Guide to Studying Wind Energy/Wildlife Interactions. Prepared for the National Wind Coordinating Collaborative, Washington, DC, USA (2011) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferrer, M., de Lucas, M., Janss, G.F.E., Casado, E., Muñoz, A.R., Bechard, M.J., Calabuig, C.P.: Weak relationship between risk assessment studies and recorded mortality in wind farms. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 38–46 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hötker, H., Thomsen, K.-M., Jeromin, H.: Impacts on Biodiversity of Exploitation of Renewable Energy Sources: The Example of Birds and Bats-Facts, Gaps in Knowledge, Demands for Further Research, and Ornithological Guidelines for the Development of Renewable Energy Exploitation. Michael-Otto-Institutim NABU, Bergenhusen (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Langston, R.H.W., Pullan, J.D.: Wind Farms and Birds: An Analysis of the Effects of Wind Farms on Birds, and. Guidance on Environmental Assessment Criteria and Site Selection Issues Report by Birdlife International on behalf of the Bern Convention. Sandy, RSPB, Sandy (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sovacool, B.K.: Contextualizing avian mortality: a preliminary appraisal of bird and bat fatalities from wind, fossil-fuel, and nuclear electricity. Energy Policy. 37, 2241–2248 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barrios, L., Rodriguez, A.: Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring-bird mortality at on-shore wind turbines. J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 72–81 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Birdlife International: Review and Guidance on use of “shutdown-on-demand” for Wind Turbines to Conserve Migrating Soaring Birds in the Rift Valley/Red Sea Flyway. Regional Flyway Facility, Amman (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dahl, E.L., May, R., Hoel, P.L., Bevanger, K., Pedersen, H.C., Røskaft, E., Stokke, B.G.: White-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) at the Smøla wind-power plant, Central Norway, lack behavioural flight responses to wind turbines. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37, 66–74 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drewitt, A.L., Langston, R.H.W.: Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis. 148, 29–42 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smallwood, K.S., Thelander, C.G.: Developing Methods to Reduce Bird Mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Final Report by to the California Energy Commission. Public Interest Energy Research-Environmental Area, Contract no. 500 – 01– 019. BioResource Consultants, California (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vasilakis, D.P., Whitfield, D.P., Schindler, S., Poirazidis, K.S., Kati, V.: Reconciling endangered species conservation with wind farm development: Cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus) in south-eastern Europe. Bio. Conserv. 196, 10–17 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Lucas, M., Janss, G.F.E., Whitfield, D.P., Ferrer, M.: Collision fatality of raptors in wind farms does not depend on raptor abundance. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1695–1703 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hunt, W.G., Jackman, R.E., Hunt, T.L., Driscoll, D.E., Culp, L.: A Population Study of Golden Eagles in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area: Population Trend Analysis 1994–1997 Report to National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Subcontract XAT-6-16459-01. Predatory Bird Research Group, University of California, Santa Cruz (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Lucas, M., Ferrer, M., Bechard, M.J., Muñoz, A.R.: Griffon vulture mortality at wind farms in southern Spain: distribution of fatalities and active mitigation measures. Biol. Conserv. 147, 184–189 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Erickson, W., Johnson, G., Young, D., Strickland, D., Good, R., Bourassa, M., Bay, K., Sernka, K.: Synthesis and Comparison of Baseline Avian and Bat Use, Raptor Nesting and Mortality Information from Proposed and Existing Wind Developments. Final report by WEST Inc. prepared for Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoover, S.I., Morrison, M.L.: Behavior of Red-tailed Hawks in a wind turbine development. J. Wildl. Manag. 69, 150–159 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson, G.D., Young, D.P., Erickson, W.P., Clayton, E., Derby, C.E.M., Dale Strickland, M.D., Good, R.E.: Wildlife Monitoring Studies Seawest Windpower Project, Carbon County, Wyoming (2000a)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson, G.D., Erickson, W.P., Strickland, M.D., Shepherd, M.F., Shepherd, D.A.: Avian Monitoring Studies at the Buffalo Ridge Wind Resource Area, Minnesota: Results of a 4-Year Study. Technical report by WEST Inc. prepared for Northern States Power Co., Minneapolis (2000b)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    EC (European Commission): Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (Document 32009 L0147) (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    EC (European Commission): Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Document 32011 L0092) (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    EC (European Commission): Wind Energy Developments and NATURA 2000. Guidance document. (2011).  https://doi.org/10.2779/98894
  28. 28.
    EC (European Commission): Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (Document 32001 L0042) (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    EC (European Commission): Directive 92/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2009 on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (Document 31992L0043) (1992)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dimalexis, A., Kastritis, T., Manolopoulos, A., Korbeti, M., Fric, J., Saravia Mullin, V., Xirouchakis, S., Bousbouras, D.: Identification and Mapping of Sensitive Bird Areas to Wind Farm Development in Greece, p. 126. Hellenic Ornithological Society, Athens (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vasilakis, D.P., Whitfield, D.P., Kati, V.: A balanced solution to the cumulative threat of industrialized wind farm development on cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus) in south-eastern Europe. PLoS One. 2(2), e0172685 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Handrinos, G., Akriotis, T.: The Birds of Greece. C. Helm, A & C. Black, London (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xirouchakis, S.M., Tsiakiris, R.: Status and population trends of vultures in Greece. In: Donázar, J.A., Margalida, A. & Gampion, A. (eds.) Vultures Feeding Stations & Sanitary Legislation: A Conflict and Its Consequences from the Perspective of Conservation Biology. Munibe (suppl) (29), pp. 154–171 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grove, A.T., Mooney, J., Rackham, O.: Crete and the South Aegean Islands: Effects of Changing Climate on the Environment. European Community, p. 439, Brussels (1991)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Handrinos, G.: The status of vultures in Greece. In: Newton, I., Chancellor, R.D. (eds.) Conservation Studies in Raptors ICBP Technical Publication, No 5. Salonica, pp. 103–115. WWGBP, Berlin (1985)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bourdakis, S., Alivizatos, H., Azmanis, P., Hallmann, B., Panayotopoulou, M., Papakonstantinou, C., Probonas, N., Rousopoulos, Y., Skartsi, D., Stara, K., Tsiakiris, R., Xirouchakis, S.: The situation of Griffon Vulture in Greece. In: Slotta-Bachmayr, L., Bögel, R., Camina, C.A. (eds.) The Eurasian Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus) in Europe and the Mediterranean. Status Report and Action Plan, pp. 48–56. EGVWG, Vienna (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Legakis, A., Maragou, P. (eds.): Red Data Book of Endangered Animals in Greece, pp. 403–405. Hellenic Zoological Society, Athens (2009). in GreekGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xirouchakis, S.M., Mylonas, M.: Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus) distribution and density in Crete. Isr. J. Zool. 50, 341–354 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Eichhorn, M., Johst, K., Seppelt, R., Drechsler, M.: Model-based estimation of collision risks of predatory birds with wind. Ecol. Soc. 17, 1 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Band, W.: Windfarms and Birds: Calculating a Theoretical Collision Risk Assuming No Avoidance Guidance notes series, p. 10. Scottish Natural Heritage, Inverness (2000)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Band, W., Madders, M., Whitfield, D.P.: Developing field and analytical methods to assess avian collision risk at wind farms. In: de Lucas, M., Janss, G., Ferrer, M. (eds.) Birds and Wind Farms, Risk Assessment and Mitigation, pp. 259–275. Servicios Informativos Ambientales/ Quercus, Barcelona (2005)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chamberlain, D.E., Rehfisch, M.R., Fox, A.D., Desholm, M., Anthony, S.J.: The effect of avoidance rates on bird mortality predictions made by wind turbine collision risk models. Ibis. 148, 198–202 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Smales, I., Muir, S., Meredith, C., Baird, R.: A description of the biosis model to assess risk of bird collisions with wind turbines. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37, 59–65 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    RAE (Regulatory Authority for Energy): Geoinformational map of Greek Regulatory authority for energy. Available from http://www.rae.gr/geo/?lang=EN. (2015)
  45. 45.
    Xirouchakis, S.M., Andreou, G.: Foraging behaviour and flight characteristics of griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus) on the island of Crete (Greece). Wildl. Biol. 15, 37–52 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Madders, M., Whitfield, D.P.: Upland raptors and the assessment of wind-farm impacts. Ibis. 148, 43–56 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xirouchakis S.M.: Monitoring the impact on the avifauna of the operation of the wind farm of TERNA-ENERGEIAKH at the site of “Perdikorifi” of Municipal District of Agia Varvara, Heraklion prefecture. Unpublished report, p. 76. Natural History Museum of Crete, University of Crete, Heraklion (2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xirouchakis, S.M., Poulakakis, N.: Biometrics, sexual dimorphism and gender determination of griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus) from Crete. Ardea. 96, 91–98 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zar, J.H.: Biostatistics, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River (1996)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Percival, S.M.: Birds and wind turbines in Britain. Brit. Wildl. 12, 8–15 (2000)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Telleria, J.L.: Overlap between wind power plants and griffon vultures Gyps fulvus in Spain. Bird Study. 56, 268–271 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Carrete, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J.A., Benítez, J.R., Lobón, M., Montoya, F., Donázar, J.A.: Mortality at wind-farms is positively related to large-scale distribution and aggregation in griffon vultures. Biol. Conserv. 145, 102–108 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gill, J.P., Sales, D., Pullinger, M., Durward, J.: The Potential Ornithological Impact of the Proposed Kentish Flats Offshore Wind farm. Ornithological Technical Addendum Report to GREP UK Marine Ltd. UK: Environmentally Sustainable Systems, Edinburgh (2002)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    SNH (Scottish Nature Heritage): Strategic Locational Guidance for Onshore Wind Farms in Respect to the Natural Heritage Policy Statement No. 02/02, update March 2009. Scottish Natural Heritage, Inverness (2009)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cook, A.S.C.P., Burton, N.H.K., Humphreys, E.M., Masden, E.A.: The Avoidance Rates of Collision Between Birds and Offshore Turbines. In: S.M.a.F (ed.) Science, p. 247. Edinburgh (2014)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xirouchakis S.M., Andreou, G., Armeni, E., Probonas, M.: Environmental Monitoring Program with Emphasis on the Avifauna at the Wind Energy Station at the Site of “Agios Kyrillos”, Municipal District of Gortyna, Heraklion prefecture. Unpublished report, pp. 82. Natural History Museum of Crete, University of Crete, Heraklion (2014)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Xirouchakis S.M., Andreou, G., Probonas, M.: Environmental Monitoring Program with Emphasis on the Avifauna at the Wind Energy Station at the Site of “Koutsotroulos”, Municipality of Mylopotapos, Rethymnon prefecture. Unpublished report, p. 64. Natural History Museum of Crete, University of Crete, Heraklion (2017)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Martin, G.R.: Understanding bird collisions with man-made objects: a sensory ecology approach. Ibis. 153, 239–254 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Northrup, J.M., Wittemyer, G.: Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. Ecol. Lett. 16, 112–125 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bright, J.A., Langston, R.W., Bullman, R., Evans, R.J., Gardner, S., Pearce-Higgins, J., Wilson, E.: Bird Sensitivity Map to Provide Locational Guidance for Onshore Wind Farms in Scotland. RSPB Research Report No 20, Sandy Bedfordshire (2006)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bright, J.A., Langston, R.W., Bullman, R., Evans, R.J., Gardner, S., Pearce-Higgins, J.: Map of bird sensitivities to wind farms in Scotland: a tool to aid planning and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2342–2356 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fielding, A.H., Whitfield, D.P., McLeod, D.R.A.: Spatial association as an indicator of the potential for future interactions between wind energy developments and golden eagles Aquila chrysaetos in Scotland. Biol. Conserv. 131, 359–369 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Walker, D., Mcgrady, M., McLuskie, A., Madders, M., McLeod, D.R.A.: Resident Golden Eagle ranging behaviour before and after construction of a windfarm in Argyll. Scottish Birds. 25, 24–40 (2005)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Carrete, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J.A., Benítez, J.R., Lobón, M., Donázar, J.A.: Large scale risk-assessment of wind-farms on population viability of a globally endangered long-lived raptor. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2954–2961 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sanz-Aguilar, A., Sánchez-Zapata, J.A., Carrete, M., Benítez, J.R., Ávila, E., Arenas, R., Donázar, J.A.: Action on multiple fronts, illegal poisoning and wind farm planning, is required to reverse the decline of the Egyptian vulture in Southern Spain. Biol. Conserv. 187, 10–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cortés-Avizanda, A., Blanco, G., DeVault, T.L., Markandya, A., Virani, M.Z., Brandt, J., Donázar, J.A.: Supplementary feeding and endangered avian scavengers: benefits, caveats, and controversies. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 191–199 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Margalida, A., Colomer, M.A.: Modelling the effects of sanitary policies on European vulture conservation. Sci. Rep. 2, 753 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Evans, D., Arvela, M.: Assessment and Reporting Under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive Explanatory Notes & Guidelines for the Period 2007–2012, p. 123. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, Brussels (2011)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    EEA (European Environmental Agency): Europe’s Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Potential. An Assessment of Environmental and Economic Constraints. – EEA Technical report No 6/2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tsoutsos, T., Kokologos, D., Tsitoura, M., Vasilomichelaki, A., Xirouchakis, S., Probonas, M., Nikolopoulou, S.: Special Study for the Site Planning and Sustainable Development of Wind Farms in the Region of Crete, p. 172. Crete Polytechnic School, Chania (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural History Museum of CreteUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece
  2. 2.School of Science & EngineeringUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece
  3. 3.Biology DepartmentUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece
  4. 4.Department of Biological Applications & TechnologyUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations